Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Totally intracorporeal delta-shaped B-I anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the Tri-Staple™ reloads on the manual Ultra handle: a prospective cohort study with historical controls

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy could be performed easily and sufficiently using only laparoscopic linear staplers. However, the restricted maneuverability and severe blurring of these staplers along with their limited hemostability induced strain. In this study, we determined the feasibility and safety of performing delta-shaped anastomosis using the Endo GIA™ Reloads with Tri-Staple™ Technology combined with Endo GIA™ Ultra Universal stapler (Tri-Staple) with a particular focus on short-term surgical outcomes.

Methods

We performed a single-institutional prospective interventional study (UMIN 000008014). The Tri-Staple was prospectively used on 23 consecutive patients who underwent a curative totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis. These patients were matched with the 19 patients previously treated using the ENDOPATH® ETS Articulating Linear Cutters (ETS) on clinical and demographic characteristics.

Results

There were no differences between the groups in anastomosis-related local complications, morbidity, non-anastomosis-related local complications, total systemic complications, and short-term outcomes with the exception of significantly reduced blood loss in the Tri-Staple group (ETS vs. Tri-Staple: 37 [10–306] vs. 15 [5–210] mL, p = 0.02). Intraoperative bleeding from the staple line was significantly reduced in the Tri-Staple group. The postoperative drain indwelling period (ETS vs. Tri-Staple, 6 [4–10] vs. 4 [2–43] days, p = 0.032), fasting period (5 [3–7] vs. 3 [3–24] days, p = 0.022), and hospital stay (14 [10–47] vs. 11 [6–58] days, p = 0.025) were significantly shorter in the Tri-Staple group. There was no mortality in this series. Acceleration assessed as indices of blurring of stapler tip might have a significant adverse influence on staple-line bleeding at stapling sites.

Conclusion

Totally laparoscopic Billroth I distal gastrectomy using Tri-Staple was feasible and safe with favorable short-term surgical outcomes. Reduced blurring while stapling may be a novel endpoint which newly developed stapling devices should target.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LADG:

Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy

TLDG:

Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy

ETS:

ENDOPATH® ETS Articulating Linear Cutters

Tri-Staple:

Endo GIA™ Reload with Tri-Staple™ Technology combined with Endo GIA™ Ultra Universal stapler

Ccr:

Creatinine clearance

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

PaO2 :

Arterial oxygen pressure

UMIN-CTR:

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry

JGCA:

Japanese Gastric Cancer Association

AUC:

Area under the curve

References

  1. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135:806–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y (2002) A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs. laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery 131:S306–S311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ikeda O, Sakaguchi Y, Aoki Y et al (2009) Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 23:2374–2379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guzman EA, Piazzi A, Lee B et al (2009) Totally laparoscopic gastric resection with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2218–2223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Song KY, Park CH, Kang HC et al (2008) Is totally laparoscopic gastrectomy less invasive than laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy? Prospective, multicenter study. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1015–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G et al (2007) Totally laparoscopic total and subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection for early and advanced gastric cancer: early and long–term results of a 100-patient series. Am J Surg 194:839–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H et al (2002) Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 195:284–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen H (2011) Applications of Tri-staple Technology in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Gen Surg News 38(3):22–23

  9. Cottam D (2011) Tri-staple Technology offers improved experience for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Gen Surg News 38(6):8–9

  10. http://www.ethicon.com/healthcare-professionals/products/staplers/endocutters/endopath-ets-articulating-linear

  11. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pedersen T, Eliasen K, Ravnborg M, Viby-Mogensen J, Qvist J, Johansen SH et al (1986) Risk factors, complications and outcome in anaesthesia. A pilot study. Eur J Anasethesiol 3:225–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Warner MA, Shields SE, Chute CG (1993) Major and mortality within 1 month of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia. JAMA 270:1437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shinohara T, Satoh S, Kanaya S et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 27:286–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanaya S, Haruta S, Kawamura Y et al (2011) Video: laparoscopy distinctive technique for suprapancreatic lymph node dissection: medial approach for laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. Surg Endosc 25:3928–3929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uyama I, Suda K, Satoh S et al (2013) Laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives. J Gastric Cancer 13:19–25

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Postoperative complication criteria according to Clavien–Dindo classification ver. 2.0. http://www.jcog.jp/doctor/tool/Clavien_Dindo.html

  20. McCulloch P, Ward J, Tekkis PP (2003) Mortality and morbidity in gastroesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ 22:1192–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim MC, Choi HJ, Jung GJ et al (2007) Techniques and complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:700–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hori S, Ochiai T, Gunji Y et al (2004) A prospective randomized trial of hand-sutured versus mechanically stapled anastomosis for gastroduodenostomy after distal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 7:24–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanimura S, Higashino M, Furkunaga Y et al (2005) Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:1177–1181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. http://surgical.covidien.com/products/stapling/idrive-ultra-powered-stapling-system

  25. Satoh Y, Matui Y, Ogawa F et al (2009) Clinical report on a computer-controlled hand-actuated stapling system for general lung surgery: the first application in Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57:402–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abel M (2011) The covidien iDrive TM powered stapling system: a new evolution in surgical transection and stapling. Gen Surg News 38(1):6–7

Download references

Disclosures

Our “Feasibility Study of Delta-Shaped Anastomosis in Totally Laparoscopic Billroth I Gastrectomy using Tri-Staple” was funded by Covidien Surgical Devices Investigator Sponsored Research Grants (2,100,000JPY), and Koichi Suda and Ichiro Uyama have conflicts of interest and financial ties to disclose. Mariko Man-i, Kenji Kikuchi, Tsuyoshi Tanaka, Shimpei Furuta, Masaya Nakauchi, Ken Ishikawa, and Yoshinori Ishida have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koichi Suda.

Additional information

Clinical Trial Registration We registered the trial procedure described in this manuscript in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) under the following authors: Ichiro Uyama and Koichi Suda. UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN 000008014.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Video clip: Blurring of the stapler tip in the process of firing analyzed with motion analysis software (M4 V 6702 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Man-i, M., Suda, K., Kikuchi, K. et al. Totally intracorporeal delta-shaped B-I anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the Tri-Staple™ reloads on the manual Ultra handle: a prospective cohort study with historical controls. Surg Endosc 29, 3304–3312 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4085-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4085-1

Keywords

Navigation