Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is increasing in popularity thanks to the benefits that have been recently demonstrated by many authors. The Da Vinci® Surgical System could overcome some limits of laparoscopy, helping the surgeons to perform safer and faster difficult procedures. Nowadays, prospective clinical trials comparing LDP to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) are lacking. The aim of this study is to present a prospective comparison between the two techniques.
Methods
Since November 2011, all patients suitable for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy were assigned either to LDP or RDP, depending on the availability of the Da Vinci® Surgical System for our Surgical Unit. Demographics, clinical, and intra- and postoperative data, including estimated costs of the procedure, were prospectively collected. Follow-up included cross-sectional imaging ended on April 2014.
Results
Twenty-two patients underwent RDP and 21 LDP; patients’ characteristics were similar. The median operative time was longer and procedures’ cost was double in RDP group. The conversion to open rate and the median length of postoperative hospital stay were 4.5 % and 7 days, respectively, in both groups. Pancreatic fistula developed in 57.1 % (12/21) and 50 % (11/22) of LDP and RDP, respectively (p = 0.870), being grade A the most frequent. Mortality was nil and an R0 resection was achieved in all Patients. The overall number of lymph nodes harvested was similar between the two groups.
Conclusions
Both RDP and LDP are valid techniques for the treatment of distal pancreatic tumors. The advantages of RDP are claimed by many but still under investigation. Some of these advantages are more subjective than objective, and it seems difficult to demonstrate a real superiority of one technique over the other in a standardized fashion. In our experience, laparoscopy has not been abandoned in favor of the robot: we continue to perform both approaches choosing upon single patient’s characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Kooby DA (2009) Should all distal pancreatectomies be performed laparoscopically? Adv Surg 43:283–300
Milone L, Daskalaki D, Wang X, Giulianotti PC (2013) State of the art of robotic pancreatic surgery. World J Surg 37:2761–2770
Venkat R et al (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 255:1048–1059
Jin T et al (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB 14:711–724
Nigri GR et al (2011) Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies. Surg Endosc 25:1642–1651
Marangos IP et al (2012) Laparoscopic resection of exocrine carcinoma in central and distal pancreas results in a high rate of radical resections and long postoperative survival. Surgery 151:717–723
Kang CM, Lee SH, Lee WJ (2014) Minimally invasive radical pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 20:2343–2351
Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24:1533–1541
Fernandez-Cruz L et al (2007) Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms: a critical analysis from a single institution. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1607–1621 discussion 1621-1602
Song KB et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25:3364–3372
Hu M et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open distal splenopancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic body and tail cancer: a retrospective, mid-term follow-up study at a single academic tertiary care institution. Surg Endosc 28:2584–2591
Daouadi M et al (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257:128–132
Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC (2003) Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 13:33–36
Giulianotti PC et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784
Zeh HJ 3rd, Bartlett DL, Moser AJ (2011) Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection. Adv Surg 45:323–340
Giulianotti PC et al (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657
Kim DH, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) The first experience of robot assisted spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Korea. Yonsei Med J 52:539–542
Kimura W et al (2010) Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery and vein: techniques and its significance. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:813–823
Melotti G et al (2007) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results on a consecutive series of 58 patients. Ann Surg 246:77–82
Bassi C et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13
Wente MN et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25
Clavien PA et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196
Waters JA et al (2010) Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148:814–823
Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 25:2004–2009
Ricci C et al (2015) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve? Surg Today 45:50–56
Braga M et al (2012) Learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a high-volume hospital. Updat Surg 64:179–183
Zureikat AH et al (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 258:554–559 discussion 559-562
Zhou W et al (2010) Stapler vs suture closure of pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg 200:529–536
Eguchi H et al (2011) A thick pancreas is a risk factor for pancreatic fistula after a distal pancreatectomy: selection of the closure technique according to the thickness. Dig Surg 28:50–56
Hanna EM et al (2013) Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: lessons learned and predictors for conversion. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9:152–159
Hwang HK et al (2013) Robot-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon’s experiences and proposal of clinical application. Surg Endosc 27:774–781
Strijker M et al (2013) Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. HPB 15:1–10
Dalla Bona E, Beltrame V, Liessi F, Sperti C (2012) Fatal pneumococcal sepsis eleven years after distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for pancreatic cancer. JOP 13:693–695
Magge D et al (2013) Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 148:525–531
Duran H et al (2014) Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 10:280–285
Heemskerk J, Bouvy ND, Baeten CG (2014) The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 28:1388–1398
Disclosures
Dr. G. Butturini, Dr. I. Damoli, Dr. L. Crepaz, Dr. G. Malleo, Dr. G. Marchegiani, Dr. D. Daskalaki, Dr. A. Esposito, Dr. S. Cingarlini, Dr. R. Salvia, and Prof. C. Bassi have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butturini, G., Damoli, I., Crepaz, L. et al. A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 29, 3163–3170 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4043-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4043-3