Skip to main content
Log in

A nationwide examination of outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy compared with cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, 1998–2010

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Improvements in percutaneous drainage techniques combined with the recognized advantages of avoiding surgery in critically ill patients have rendered cholecystostomy an attractive treatment option, particularly in those patients with acute acalculus cholecystitis. However, robust data to guide surgeons in choosing cholecystostomy versus cholecystectomy have been lacking.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 1998–2010 was performed. Patients identified as having acute cholecystitis (calculus and acalculus) were identified by ICD-9 diagnosis codes and further classified as having undergone cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy. Patients with both procedures were included in the cholecystectomy group. Patients with neither procedure and those younger than age 18 years were excluded. Multivariate analyses examined mortality, length of stay, total charges, gallbladder/gastrointestinal complications, or any complication. Results were adjusted for age, race, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, and teaching-hospital status. Subset analyses were performed among patients who survived and patients who died.

Results

A total of 248,229 calculus and 58,518 acalculus acute cholecystitis patients were analyzed. On unadjusted analysis, mortality, length of stay, and total charges were higher, but complication rates were lower, in patients with a cholecystostomy. Adjusted analysis showed lower odds of complications [calculus: odds ratio (OR) 0.3, p < 0.001; acalculus: OR 0.4, p < 0.001] but higher odds of mortality, total charges, and LOS (calculus: mortality OR 5.2, p < 0.001, $29,113, p < 0.001, +5.1 days, p < 0.001; acalculus: mortality OR 3.7, p < 0.001; $43,771, p < 0.001, +6.2 days, p < 0.001) among patients who received cholecystostomy. Results were similar in subset analyses.

Conclusions

Patients receiving cholecystostomy were more likely to be older and have more comorbidities. Among patients with calculus or acalculus cholecystitis, patients with cholecystostomy had decreased complication rates compared with patients with cholecystectomy. However, patients who received cholecystostomy had increased odds of death, longer length of stay, and higher total charges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2010) Open, small- incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD008318

  2. Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, Rouge C, Duplessis R, Cervi C, Arnaud JP (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: A prospective comparative study in patients with acute vs chronic cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 14:358–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Winbladh A, Gullstrand P, Svanvik J, Sandstrom P (2009) Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB 11:183–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2011) Overview of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Accessed 2 March 2011

  5. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor (2012) CPI inflation calculator. http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2012

  6. Downing SR, Datoo G, Oyetunji TA, Fullum T, Chang DC, Ahuja N (2010) Asian race/ethnicity as a risk factor for bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 8:785–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Alex KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG (1993) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1075–1079 discussion 1081–1090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalliafas S, Ziegler D, Flancbaum L, Choban PS (1998) Acute acalculous cholecystitis. Incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and outcome. Am Surg 64:471–475

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Laurila J, Syrjala H, Laurila PA, Saarnio J, Ala-Kokko TI (2004) Acute acalculous cholecystitis in critically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 48:986–991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung YH, Choi ER, Kim KM, Kim MJ, Lee JK, Lee KT, Lee KH, Choo SW, Do YS, Choo IW (2011) Can percutaneous cholecystostomy be a definitive management for acute acalculus cholecystitis? J Clin Gastroenterol. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182274375

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ryu JK, Ryu KH, Kim KH (2003) Clinical features of acute acalculous cholecystitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2:166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganpathi IS, Diddapur RK, Eugene H, Karim M (2007) Acute acalculous cholecystitis: challenging the myths. HPB 9:131–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kortram K, de Vries Reilingh TS, Wiezer MJ, van Ramshorst B, Boerma D (2011) Percutaneous drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1771-5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Byrne MF, Suhocki P, Mitchell RM, Pappas TN, Stiffler HL, Jowell PS, Branch MS, Baillie J (2003) Percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: experience of 45 patients at a US referral center. J Am Coll Surg 197(2):206–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nasim S, Khan S, Alvi R, Chaudhary M (2011) Emerging indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy for the management of acute cholecystitis—a retrospective review. Int J Surg 9:456–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McKay A, Abulfaraj M, Lipschitz J (2012) Short- and long-term outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 26:1343–1351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hatzidakis AA, Prassopoulos P, Petinarakis I, Sanidas E, Chrysos E, Chalkiadakis G, Tsiftsis D, Gourtsoyiannis NC (2002) Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy vs conservative treatment. Eur Radiol 12:1778–1784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brunt LM, Quasebarth MA, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ (2001) Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly. Surg Endosc 15:700–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kauvar DS, Brown BD, Braswell AW, Harnisch M (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: increased operative complications and conversions to laparotomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:379–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McGillicuddy EA, Schuster KM, Barre K, Suarez L, Hall MR, Kaml GJ, Davis KA, Longo WE (2012) Non-operative management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly. Br J Surg 99:1254–1261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bingener J, Richards ML, Schwesinger WH, Strodel WE, Sirinek KR (2003) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elderly patients: gold standard for golden years? Arch Surg 138:531–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Melloul E, Denys A, Demartines N, Calmes JM, Schafer M (2011) Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter? World J Surg 35:826–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Abi-Haidar Y, Sanchez V, Williams SA, Itani KMF (2012) Revisiting percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis based on a 10-year experience. Arch Surg 147(5):416–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Jamie Anderson, David Chang, and Mark Talamini have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. This research was unfunded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jamie E. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, J.E., Chang, D.C. & Talamini, M.A. A nationwide examination of outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy compared with cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis, 1998–2010. Surg Endosc 27, 3406–3411 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2924-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2924-5

Keywords

Navigation