Skip to main content
Log in

Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery

  • Review
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) represents the next step in laparoscopic surgery in further reducing the invasiveness of surgical procedures with cosmetic advantages. Recalling the increased rates of major complications at the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy 20 years ago, however, it is clear that appropriate training is required before adopting a new technique. This study aims to review the current evidence for training and skills acquisition for SILS.

Methods

A comprehensive database search of PubMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar was carried out. Studies considered for inclusion were those addressing SILS learning curves, skills acquisition, or training.

Results

21 studies were included in the final analysis. Ten clinical case series with analysis of SILS learning curve demonstrated a significant learning curve for conventional multiport laparoscopic (LAP)-trained surgeons over the course of initial SILS cases, with several studies reporting increased risk of conversion and complication rates. Five laboratory-based studies demonstrated differences in SILS skills acquisition compared with LAP. Six studies describing SILS-specific training curricula were analysed, but none included a robust validation of the curriculum.

Conclusions

Clinical case series and laboratory-based skills acquisition studies demonstrate the unique requirements of SILS, with skill sets and ergonomic demands which cannot be directly adapted from existing LAP experience. Some studies have already reported higher complication rates in initial SILS cases. To avoid repeating the mistakes of the past, the implementation of an evidence- and competency-based SILS curriculum is necessary to ensure appropriate training of future SILS surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Litynski GS (1998) Erich Muhe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS 2:341–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Stiernstam M, Westman B, Lundell L (2005) Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:44–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP, Nelson H, Wang E, Ko CY, Soper NJ (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2001–2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greaves N, Nicholson J (2011) Single incision laparoscopic surgery in general surgery: a review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:437–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M, Caddedu J, Canes D, Curcillo PG 2nd, Desai MM, Evanko JC, Falcone T, Fazio V, Gettman M, Gumbs AA, Haber GP, Kaouk JH, Kim F, King SA, Ponsky J, Remzi F, Rivas H, Rosemurgy A, Ross S, Schauer P, Sotelo R, Speranza J, Sweeney J, Teixeira J (2010) Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc 24:762–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moore MJ, Bennett CL (1995) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg 170:55–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Feinberg EJ, Agaba E, Feinberg ML, Camacho D, Vemulapalli P (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy learning curve experience seen in a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Han HJ, Choi SB, Park MS, Lee JS, Kim WB, Song TJ, Choi SY (2011) Learning curve of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy determined using the non-linear ordinary least squares method based on a non-linear regression model: an analysis of 150 consecutive patients. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Sci 18:510–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qiu Z, Sun J, Pu Y, Jiang T, Cao J, Wu W (2011) Learning curve of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): a preliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladder diseases. World J Surg 35:2092–2101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Solomon D, Bell RL, Duffy AJ, Roberts KE (2010) Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve. Surg Endosc 24:2954–2957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kravetz AJ, Iddings D, Basson MD, Kia MA (2009) The learning curve with single-port cholecystectomy. JSLS 13:332–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gawart M, Dupitron S, Lutfi R (2012) Laparoendoscopic single-site gastric bands versus standard multiport gastric bands: a comparison of technical learning curve measured by surgical time. Am J Surg 203:327–329 discussion 330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang L, Liu B, Wu Z, Yang Q, Chen W, Xu Z, Wang C, Xiao L, Wang F, Sun Y (2012) A matched-pair comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and standard laparoscopic radical nephrectomy by a single urologist. J Endourol 26(6):676–681

    Google Scholar 

  15. Park YH, Baik KD, Lee YJ, Kim KT, Kim HH (2012) Learning curve analysis for laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 26:494–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Santos BF, Reif TJ, Soper NJ, Hungness ES (2011) Effect of training and instrument type on performance in single-incision laparoscopy: results of a randomized comparison using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25:3798–3804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fransen SA, Mertens LS, Botden SM, Stassen LP, Bouvy ND (2012) Performance curve of basic skills in single-incision laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy: is it really more difficult for the novice? Surg Endosc 26:1231–1237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Santos BF, Enter D, Soper NJ, Hungness ES (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 25:483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis T, Aggarwal R, Kwasnicki R, Darzi A, Paraskeva P (2012) Does previous laparoscopic experience improve ability to perform single-incision laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 26:1214–1219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alevizos L, Brinkman W, Fingerhut A, Jakimowicz J, Leandros E (2012) Novice surgeons versus experienced surgeons in laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery: a comparison of performances in a surgical simulator. World J Surg 36:939–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sodergren MH, McGregor C, Farne H, Cao J, Lv Z, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, Dazi A, Paraskeva P (2012) A randomized comparative study evaluating learning curves of novices in a basic single-incision laparoscopic surgery task. ASGBI, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khandelwal S, Wright AS, Figueredo E, Pellegrini CA, Oelschlager BK (2011) Single-incision laparoscopy: training, techniques, and safe introduction to clinical practice. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:687–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stroup SP, Bazzi W, Derweesh IH (2010) Training for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. BJU Int 106:934–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu AS, Podolsky ER, Huneke R, Curcillo PG 2nd (2010) Initial surgeon training for single port access surgery: our first year experience. JSLS 14:200–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramalingam M, Senthil K, Murugesan A, Pai MG (2010) Cost reductive laparoendoscopic single site surgery endotrainer and animal lab training-our methodology. Diagn Therapeut Endosc 2010:598165

    Google Scholar 

  26. Muller EM, Cavazzola LT, Machado Grossi JV, Mariano MB, Morales C, Brun M (2010) Training for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Int J Surg 8:64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kommu SS (2011) Ex vivo training model for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. J Minim Access Surg 7:104–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aggarwal R, Crochet P, Dias A, Misra A, Ziprin P, Darzi A (2009) Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 96:1086–1093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang L, Liu B, Wu Z, Yang Q, Hehir M, Chen W, Xu Z, Xiao L, Wang F, Sun Y (2011) Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: more than 1-year experience in radical nephrectomy and its learning curve study. J Endourol 25:1859–1865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong JS, Cheung YS, Chan KW, Chong CC, Lee KF, Wong J, Lai PB (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: from four wounds to one. Hong Kong Med J 17:465–468

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hernandez J, Ross S, Morton C, McFarlin K, Dahal S, Golkar F, Albrink M, Rosemurgy A (2010) The learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy: definable, short, and safe. J Am Coll Surg 211:652–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Authors Pucher, Sodergren, Singh, Darzi and Paraskeva have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip H. Pucher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pucher, P.H., Sodergren, M.H., Singh, P. et al. Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 27, 1478–1484 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2632-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2632-6

Keywords

Navigation