Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for malignant disease

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic colectomy has been shown to confer equivalent disease-free and overall survival compared to traditional open colectomy. Patients experience benefit in length of hospital stay as well as diminished narcotic use. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SIL-C) may offer additional benefit compared to traditional laparoscopic colectomy without compromising oncologic principles.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent SIL-C and traditional laparoscopic colectomy (TLC) for potentially malignant and malignant disease performed by a single surgeon. SIL-C consisted of a single-port access device with traditional lateral-to-medial laparoscopic technique.

Results

Between January and October 2009, 27 SIL-C procedures were performed. Forty-six TLC patients from the prior year were used as controls. Median age was 70 years and 54% were female, with no differences between the groups. The median body mass index (BMI) was 27 kg/m2 (range = 18.3–39.9) and 26 kg/m2 (16.6–71.4) for SIL-C and TLC, respectively. The median lymph node harvest was 15 (range = 3–32) and 17 (0–35) for SIL-C and TLC, respectively. The median operative time was 114 min (range = 59–268) and 135 min (45–314) for SIL-C and TLC, respectively. Five SIL-C required additional ports while six TLC required conversion to open technique. The median length of stay was 3 days (range = 2–17) and 5 days (range = 2–11) for SIL-C and TLC, respectively (p = 0.079). There were five significant postoperative complications in the SIL-C group and 16 in the TLC group, including four postoperative ileus and one leak. There were no postoperative deaths in the SIL-C group and two in the TLC group.

Conclusions

SIL-C can be used safely in selected colon cancer patients with no difference in blood loss, OR time, or lymph node retrieval. SIL-C patients may have a shorter LOS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287(3):321–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neudecker J, Klein F, Bittner R, Carus T, Stroux A, Schwenk W, LAPKON II Trialists (2009) Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:1458–1467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Merkow RP, Nelson H, Wang E, Ko CY, Soper NJ (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2001–2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V, Harms B, Foley EF (2009) Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complications after abdominal colectomy. Ann Surg 249(4):596–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Coumaros D, Marescaux J (2008) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: transgastric cholecystectomy in a survival porcine model. Surg Endosc 22:1126–1130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fan JK, Tong DK, Law S, Law WL (2009) Transvaginal cholecystectomy with endoscopic submucosal dissection instruments and single-channel endoscope: a survival study in porcine model. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:29–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Esposito C (1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12:177–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9(4):361–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Raman JD, Cadeddu JA, Rao P, Rane A (2008) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: initial urological experience and comparison with natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. BJU Int 101:1493–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Law WL, Fan JK, Poon JT (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: early experience. Dis Colon Rectum 53:284–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dutta S (2009) Early experience with single incision laparoscopic surgery: eliminating the scar from abdominal operations. J Pediatr Surg 44(9):1741–1745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(10):1013–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langwieler TE, Nimmesgern T, Back M (2009) Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23(5):1138–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Merchant AM, Cook MW, White BC, Davis SS, Sweeney JF, Lin E (2009) Transumbilical Gelport access technique for performing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). J Gastrointest Surg 13:159–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saber AA, Elgamal MH, Itawi EA, Rao AJ (2008) Single incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS): a novel technique. Obes Surg 18(10):1338–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahad S, Figueredo EJ (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy. MedGenMed 9(2):37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Franks PJ, Bosanquet N, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Copeland J, Smith AM, Quirke P, Guillou PJ, CLASICC trial participants (2006) Short-term costs of conventional vs laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Br J Cancer 95(1):6–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Janson M, Björholt I, Carlsson P, Haglind E, Henriksson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Cancer 91(4):409–417

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr. Moore receives honoraria for serving as a speaker and proctor for Covidien and Ethicon. He also receives educational grant funding from Covidien to support a fellowship in minimally invasive surgery. Dr. Kimberly Brown has received a research grant from Covidien. Dr. McNally has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly M. Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNally, M.E., Todd Moore, B. & Brown, K.M. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endosc 25, 3559–3565 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1758-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1758-2

Keywords

Navigation