Abstract
Background
Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) is the most common diverticulum of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Various flexible endoscopic techniques have been used for division of the septum. However, the learning curve associated with these techniques might be difficult to overcome given the overall rarity of this condition. This can lead either to complications or to potential recurrence of symptoms. The authors hypothesized that a flexible bipolar hemostasis forceps developed for natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) procedures would facilitate precise endoscopic diverticulotomy and simultaneously enable sealing of divided tissue edges.
Methods
Because the pharyngeal diverticulum (PD) in the pig is comparable with a human ZD, this nonsurvival model was used to perform endoscopic diverticulotomy using two energy technologies. The PD septum was dissected with either a flexible and a rotating bipolar forceps (n = 5) or with standard needleknife cautery (NK; n = 3). The feasibility and safety of the two technologies were compared.
Results
In contrast to NK myotomy, the bipolar forceps could easily be readjusted before any tissue dissection in all (5/5) interventions, and energy was applied only on the tissue to be divided. Tissue bonding at the edges of the septum was observed in all cases. The monopolar energy in NK dissection made precise and centered division of the septum difficult to achieve and did not bond the edges of the septum. One perforation occurred with NK (1/3).
Conclusions
The flexible bipolar forceps used for Zenker’s diverticulotomy is appealing due to its ease of application and potential to coaptate mucomuscular tissue edges. Although further evaluation with a survival model is necessary, it also seems to be a safer approach than NK. This novel tool could facilitate performance of surgical endoscopists and may make flexible endoscopy the preferred method for Zenker’s ablation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferreira LE, Simmons DT, Baron TH (2008) Zenker’s diverticula: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and flexible endoscopic management. Dis Esophagus 21:1–8
Huang BS, Unni KK, Paynen WS (1984) Long-term survival following diverticulectomy for cancer in pharyngoesophageal (Zenker’s) diverticulum. Ann Thorac Surg 38:207–210
Avisar E, Luketich JD (2000) Adenocarcinoma in a mid-esophageal diverticulum. Ann Thorac Surg 69:288–289
Tomos P, Karakatsani A, Lachanas E, Zarbis N, Koulouris NG, Lioulias A (2005) A rare cause of lobar pneumonia and tracheal stenosis: giant Zenker’s diverticulum. Respiration 72:650
Chang CY, Payyapilli RJ, Scher RL (2009) Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum: review of literature and experience in 159 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 113:957–965
Richtsmeier WJ (2005) Myotomy length determinants in endoscopic staple-assisted esophagodiverticulostomy for small Zenker’s diverticula. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:341–346
Vogelsang A, Preiss C, Neuhaus H, Schumacher B (2007) Endotherapy of Zenker’s diverticulum using the needleknife technique: long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 39:131–136
Seaman DL, a Levy J, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Herman L, Knipschield M (2007) An animal training model for endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc 65:1050–1053
Mosher HP (1917) Webs and pouches of the esophagus: their diagnosis and treatment. Surg Gynecol Obstet 25:175–187
Dohlman G, Mattsson O (1960) The endoscopic operation for hypopharyngeal diverticula: a roentgencinematographic study. Arch Otolaryngol 71:744–752
Collard J-M, Otte J-B, Kestens PJ (1993) Endoscopic stapling technique of esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Ann Thorac Surg 56:573–576
Sen P, Bhattacharyya MS (2004) Endoscopic stapling of pharyngeal pouch. J Laryngol Otol 118:601–606
Mirza S, Dutt SN, Irving RM (2003) Iatrogenic perforation in endoscopic stapling diverticulotomy for pharyngeal pouches. J Laryngol Otol 117:93–98
Mulder CJJ, den Hartog G, Robijn RJ, Thies JE (1995) Flexible endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: a new approach. Endoscopy 27:438–442
Tang SJ, Jazrawi SF, Chen E, Tang L, Myers LL (2008) Flexible endoscopic clip-assisted Zenker’s diverticulotomy: the first case series. Laryngoscope 118:1199–1205
Costamagna G, Iacopini F, Triangali A, Marchese M, Spada C, Familiari P, Mutignani M, Bella A (2007) Flexible endoscopic Zenker’s diverticulotomy: cap-assisted technique vs. diverticuloscope-assisted technique. Endoscopy 39:146–152
Seaman DL, a Levy J, Gostout CJ, Rajan E, Knipschield M (2008) A new device to simplify flexible endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc 67:112–115
Park PO, Long GL, Bergström M, Cunningham C, Vakharia OJ, Bakos GJ, Bally KR, Rothstein RI, Swain PC (2010) A randomized comparison of a new flexible bipolar hemostasis forceps designed principally for NOTES versus a conventional surgical laparoscopic bipolar forceps for intraabdominal vessel sealing in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 71:835–841
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ethicon Endosurgery for kindly providing the flexible bipolar sealing forceps. The authors also thank Olympus USA for providing the dual-channel endoscope. The companies were not involved in the study design or data acquisition and interpretation.
Disclosures
Lee L. Swanström serves as a consultant for Ethicon Endosurgery. Erwin Rieder, Danny V. Martinec, and Christy M. Dunst have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rieder, E., Martinec, D.V., Dunst, C.M. et al. Flexible endoscopic Zenkers diverticulotomy with a novel bipolar forceps: a pilot study and comparison with needleknife dissection. Surg Endosc 25, 3273–3278 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1704-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1704-3