Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is as safe and efficient as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in achieving bile duct clearance from stones. No clear guidelines are available on LCBDE with respect to indications for trans-cystic approach versus choledochotomy, or regarding when to use either flexible choledochoscopy (FCD) or intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) guidance.

Methods

From January 2001 until November 2006, 113 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and gallbladder in situ were enrolled in a prospective non-randomized study to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with LCBDE on an intention-to-treat basis. Twenty-three patients were aged 80 years or older with severe comorbidity. Preoperative ERCP with attempted stone clearance was performed in 24 patients. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was attempted for CBDS in the presence of acute cholecystitis in 24 patients. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was performed via the trans-cystic approach in 83 patients and via choledochotomy in 30 patients. Flexible choledochoscopy was used in 79 patients and IOC guidance in 34 patients.

Results

No mortality occurred. Postoperative complications were encountered in nine patients. Laparoscopic stone clearance of the bile duct was successful in 91.8% of the patients. Median length of hospital stay (LOS) was two days (range, 0 to 24 days) after trans-cystic LCBDE and six days (range, 2 to 34 days) after stone clearance via choledochotomy (p < 0.0001). Choledochotomy was performed for CBDS measuring an average of 11.5 mm (range, 5 to 30 mm) in diameter while trans-cystic LCBDE was successful for stones measuring an average of 5 mm (range, 2 to 14 mm) (p < 0.0001). Mean duration of surgery was 75 minutes (range, 30 to 180 minutes) when FCD was used, and 107 minutes (range, 45 to 240 minutes) in patients undergoing LCBDE under IOC guidance (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and LCBDE with stone extraction can be performed with high efficiency, minimal morbidity and without mortality. A trans-cystic approach is feasible in most patients, whereas choledochotomy should be restricted to large bile duct stones that cannot be extracted through the cystic duct. The use of flexible choledochoscopy is preferable to IOC guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Arkush AM, Nagan RF (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6:10–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berci G, Morgenstern L (1994) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. A multi-institutional SAGES study. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 8:1168–1174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bingener J, Schwesinger WH (2006) Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States. Surg Endosc 20:577–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Britton J, Bickerstaff KI, Savage A (1995) Benign diseases of the biliary tract. In: Oxford Textbook of Surgery on CD, Oxford University Press and Electronic Publishing BV. Rotterdam Portions, Iterated Systems:1209–1239

  5. Carr-Locke DL (1990) Acute gallstone pancreatitis and endoscopic therapy. Review. Endoscopy 22:180–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clayton ESJ, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93:1185–1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335:909–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, De Bernardin M, Ederle A, Fina P, Fratton A (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration. A methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19(2):CD003327

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nathanson LK, O’Rourke NA, Martin IJ, Fielding GA, Cowen AE, Roberts RK, Kendall BJ, Kerlin P, Devereux BM (2005) Postoperative ERCP versus Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi. A randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:188–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peganini AM, Lezoche E (1998) Follow-up of 161 unselected consecutive patients treated laparoscopically for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 12:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Poulose BK, Arbogast PG, Holzman MD (2006) National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores. Surg Endosc 20:186–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351:159–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K (2002) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study. Minerva Chir 57:467–474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT (1996) MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 199:91–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stoker ME (1995) Common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 130:265–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vaira D, D’Anna L, Ainley C, Dowsett J, Williams S, Baillie J, Caims S, Croker J, Salmon P, Cotton P, et al. (1989) Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet 2(8660):431–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Rocher L, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Pelletier G (1999) Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 44:118–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    B. Topal, R. Aerts & F. Penninckx

Authors
  1. B. Topal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Aerts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Penninckx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Topal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Topal, B., Aerts, R. & Penninckx, F. Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy. Surg Endosc 21, 2317–2321 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9577-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9577-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation