Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D1+β compared with D1+α lymph node dissection

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with D1+β lymph node dissection has become the most popular treatment for early gastric cancer in Asian countries. However, the same clinical advantages with this procedure as with LADG with D1+α lymph node dissection has not been shown. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of LADG with D1+β to that of LADG with D1+α lymph node dissection.

Methods

During the period June 2002 through June 2006, LADG with D1+α lymph node dissection was performed in 54 patients, and LADG with D1+β lymph node dissection was performed in 42 patients. Surgical findings, clinicopathological data, postoperative course, complications, nutritional status, and blood analysis findings were compared between the two groups. Differences were analyzed with Mann–Whitney U test and chi-square test.

Results

Patients in the two groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, body mass index, and stage and pathological characteristics of gastric cancer. A significantly greater number of N2 lymph nodes were harvested by D1+β lymph node dissection than by D1+α dissection (5.9 vs. 2.7, P < 0.01). However, no significances in the total number of retrieved lymph nodes (24.7 vs. 22.2) or perigastric lymph nodes dissected (18.9 vs. 19.4) were identified between the D1+β and D1+α groups. There was also no significant difference between the D1+α and D1+β groups with respect to operation time, blood loss, complication rate, time to first walking, first flatus, first eating, and first defecation, frequency of analgesics given, volume of food intake on postoperative day 7, weight loss, and postoperative hospital stay. Blood analysis showed there were no significant differences in white blood cell count, granulocyte count, lymphocyte count, levels of C-reactive protein, and serum albumin.

Conclusions

The short-term outcome of LADG with D1+β lymph node dissection is comparable to that of LADG with D1+α lymph node dissection. According to the oncological requirements, we can apply this operation as a minimally invasive surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135:806–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (2006) Nationwide survey on endoscopic surgery in Japan (in Japanese) J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg 11:551–556

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yasuda K, Shiraishi N, Suematsu T, Yamaguchi K, Adachi Y, Kitano S (1999) Rate of detection of lymph node metastasis is correlated with the depth of submucosal invasion in early stage gastric carcinoma. Cancer 85:2119–2123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English ed. Gastric Cancer 1:10–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shiraishi N, Yasuda K, Kitano S (2006) Laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 9:167–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yano H, Monden T, Kinuta M, Nakano Y, Tono T, Matsui S, Iwazawa T, Kanoh T, Katsushima S (2001) The usefulness of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in comparison with that of open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 4:93–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weber KJ, Reyes CD, Gagner M, Divino CM (2003) Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endosc 17:968–971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Kishida S, Nishikawa M, Ogata A, Osugi H (2005) Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:1177–1181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Perissat J, Mahajna A (2005) Completely laparoscopic total and partial gastrectomy for benign and malignant diseases: A single institute’s prospective analysis. J Am Coll Surg 200:191–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mochiki E, Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, Nakabayashi T, Asao T, Kuwano H (2005) Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: Five years’ experience. Surgery 137:317–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Noshiro H, Nagai E, Shimizu S, Uchiyama A, Tanaka M (2005) Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy with standard radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:1592–1596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y (2002) A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: An interim report. Surgery 131:S306–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huscher CGS, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A, Ponzano C (2005) Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: Five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 241:232–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Asao T, Hosouchi Y, Nakabayashi T, Haga N, Mochiki E, Kuwano H (2001) Laparoscopically assisted total or distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 88:128–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mochiki E, Nakabayashi T, Kamimura H, Haga N, Asao T, Kuwano H (2002) Gastrointestinal recovery and outcome after laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Surg 26:1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Kasai Y, Kanyama Y, Hibi K, Ito K, Akiyama S, Nakao A (2003) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection for early gastric carcinoma: A review of 43 cases. J Am Coll Surg 196:75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimizu S, Noshiro H, Nagai E, Uchiyama A, Tanaka M (2003) Laparoscopic gastric surgery in a Japanese institution: Analysis of the initial 100 procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197:372–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Lirici MM, Napolitano C, Piro F (2004) Videolaparoscopic total and subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Am J Surg 188:728–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carboni F, Lepiane P, Santoro R, Mancini P, Lorusso R, Santoro E (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: Preliminary experience. Gastric Cancer 8:75–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2004) The guidelines for the treatment of Gastric Cancer. Tokyo, Kanahara Co

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Kakisako K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I gastrectomy (LADG) for cancer: Our 10 years’ experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:204–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a Japan–China Sasakawa Medical Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia-Ming Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wei, JM., Shiraishi, N., Goto, S. et al. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D1+β compared with D1+α lymph node dissection. Surg Endosc 22, 955–960 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9529-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9529-9

Keywords

Navigation