Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality even in specialized centers. Minimally invasive surgery has been proposed to decrease these complications.

Methods

The authors present their results regarding postoperative complications and the survival rate at 3 years, comparing the classic open procedures (transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy) with minimally invasive surgery. Surgical procedures were performed according to procedures published elsewhere.

Results

The study enrolled 166 patients who underwent surgery between 1990 and 2003. Open transthoracic surgery was performed for 60 patients. In this group of patients, postoperative mortality was observed in 11% of the cases. Major, minor, and late complications were observed in 61.6% of the patients, and the 3-year survival rate was 30% for this group. Open transhiatal surgery was performed for 59 patients. The morbidity, mortality, and 3-year rate were almost the same as for the transthoracic surgery group. For the 47 patients submitted to minimally invasive procedures (thoracoscopic and laparoscopic), the complications and mortality rates were significantly reduced (38.2% and 6.4%, respectively). For the patients submitted to minimally invasive surgery, the 3-year survival rate was 45.4%. It is important to clarify that the patients submitted to minimally invasive surgery manifested early stages of the diseases, and that this the reason why the morbimortality and survival rates were better.

Conclusions

The transthoracic and transhiatal open approaches have similar early and late results. Minimally invasive surgery is an option for patients with esophageal carcinoma, with reported results similar to those for open surgery. This approach is indicated mainly for selected patients with early stages of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braghetto I, Csendes A, Rappoport J, Chiong H, Debandi A (1993) Video-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for cancer (abstract). Hepatogastroenterology 3: 313

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braghetto I, Csendes A, Rappoport J, Chiong H, Debandi A (1997) Video-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy. World Video Rev Surg 14: 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braghetto I, Korn O, Burdiles P (2001) Esophagectomy and laparoscopic mobilization with minilaparotomy for tubulization and esophageal replacement. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11: 119–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bumm R, Feussner H, Bartels H, Stein H, Dittler HJ, Hofler H, Siewert Jr (1997) Radical transhiatal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and endodissection for distal esophageal carcinoma. World J Surg 21: 822

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chu KM, Law SYK, Fok M, Wong J (1997) A prospective randomized trial of transhiatal and transthoracic resection of lower third esophageal carcinoma. Am J Surg 174: 320–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Curran AJ, Gough DB, O Muircheartaigh I, Keeling P (1992) Transhiatal esophagectomy in the management of advanced esophageal carcinoma. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37: 225–228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EB, et al. (1995) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 1–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernando HC, Christie NA, Luketich JD (2000) Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 12: 195–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fok M, Law S, Stipa F, Cheng S, Wong J (1993) A comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for oesophageal carcinoma. Endoscopy 25(Suppl): 660–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH (2001) Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 cases of en bloc esophagectomies. Ann Surg 234: 520–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horstmann O, Verreet P, Becker H, Ohmann C, Roher H (1995) Transhiatal oesophagectomy compared with transthoracic resection and systematic lymphadenectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg 161: 557–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hulscher JBF, Tijssern JGP, Obertop H, van Lanschot JB (2001) Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 72: 306–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Little VR, Buenaventura PO, Luketich JD (2002) Minimally invasive resection for esophageal cancer. Surg Clin North A 82: 711–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luketich JD, Nguyen NT, Waigel T, Ferson P, Keenam R, Schauer P (1998) Minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2: 243–247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA (2000) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 70: 906–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Macha M, Whyte R (2000) The current role of transhiatal esophagectomy. Chest Surg Clin North Am 10: 499–517

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette D, Rivers R, Wolfe BM (2003) Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lesson learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197: 902–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen NT, Schauer PR, Luketich JD (1999) Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 188: 328–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Orringer MB (1993) Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 105: 265–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rindani R, Martin CJ, Cox MR (1999) Transhiatal vs Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: is there a difference? Aust. N Z J Surg 69: 187–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sadanaga N, Kuwano H, Watanabe M, et al. (1994) Laparoscopic assisted surgery: a new technique for transhiatal esophageal dissection. Am J Surg 168: 355–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sammartino P, Chirletti P, Calcaterra D, et al. (1997) Video-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for cancer. Int Surg 82: 406–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stark SP, Romberg MS, Pierce GE, et al. (1996) Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and cardia. Am J Surg 172: 478–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Swanstrom LL, Hansen P (1997) Laparoscopic total esophagectomy. Arch Surg 132: 943–947

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Watson A (1994) Operable esophageal cancer: current results from the West. World J Surg 18: 361–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yahata H, Sugino K, Takiguchi T, et al. (1997) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for advanced thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 13–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Braghetto.

Additional information

Presented as a “free paper” during the 9th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Cancun, Mexico, 4-7 February, 2004

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braghetto, I., Csendes, A., Cardemil, G. et al. Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival. Surg Endosc 20, 1681–1686 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0009-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0009-4

Keywords

Navigation