Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fistulas

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic fistulas are managed primarily by conservative treatment. Surgery is performed in cases of conservative treatment failure. Endoscopic treatment is reported to be both effective and safe as an alternative treatment method.

Methods

A total of 26 patients underwent endoscopic treatment after failure of conservative treatment between January 2002 and November 2004. The mean time between the onset of fistula and the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedure was 95 days. The mean fistula output volume was 400 ml per day. Four patients had pancreatic ascites. The aim of the endoscopic treatment was to bypass the ductal disruption by placing stents or drains where the origin of fistulous tract could be identified, and to lower the pancreatic duct pressure by performing pancreatic sphincterotomy or by placing stents where the site of the leak could not be identified.

Results

Pancreatography could be performed in all the patients except one. Partial duct disruption occurred in 16 patients. All of the fistulas closed after the ductal disruption was bypassed. Pancreatic sphincterotomy or endoprothesis placement was effective for eight of the remaining nine patients in whom the ductal disruption originated from the tail of the pancreas and hence could not be bypassed. The overall success rate was 94% for the patients with partial duct disruption. Four patients had side branch leaks. All of them closed after placement of an endoprothesis. Fistulas closed in only one (20%) of the five patients with complete duct disruption. Pancreatic ascites resolved in two of the four patients after endoscopic treatment. No serious complications resulted from endoscopic treatment other than proximally migrated stents in two patients.

Conclusions

Endoscopic treatment is an effective and safe method for patients with pancreatic fistulas unresponsive to conservative treatment. The success rate is very high, especially for patients with partial and side branch duct disruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falconi M, Pederzoli P (2001) The relevance of gastrointestinal fistulae in clinical practice: a review. Gut 49: 2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Le Moine O, Matos C, Closset J, Deviere J (2004) Endoscopic management of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic and other abdominal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18: 957–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim SH, Lee KD, Kim IW, Baik SK, Kwon SO, Park JW, Cho NC, Rhoe BS (2001) The role of endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in the treatment of traumatic pancreatic duct injury. Gastrointest Endosc 54: 49–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Neoptolemos JP, London NJM, Carr-Locke DL (1993) Assessment of the main pancreatic duct integrity by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in patients with acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 80: 94–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Büchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, Kulli C, Wagner V, Zgraggen K (2000) Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 87: 883–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Halloran CM, Ghaneh P, Bosonnet L, Hartley MN, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP (2002) Complications of pancreatic cancer resection. Dig Surg 19: 138–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pederzoli P, Bassi C, Falconi M, Albrigo R, Vantini I, Micciolo R (1986) Conservative treatment of external pancreatic fistulas with parenteral nutrition alone or in combination with continuous intravenous infusion of somatostatin, glucagon, or calcitonin. Surg Gynecol Obstet 163: 428–432

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lansden FT, Adams DB, Anderson MC (1989) Treatment of external pancreatic fistulas with somatostatin. Am Surg 55: 695–698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin FM, Rossi RL, Munson JL, Remine SG, Braasch JW (1989) Management of pancreatic fistulas. Arch Surg 124: 571–583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kozarek RA, Patterson DJ, Ball TJ, Traverso LW (1989) Endoscopic placement of pancreatic stents and drains in the management of pancreatitis. Ann Surg 209: 261–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Freeny PC, Ryan JA, Traverso LW (1991) Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections. Gastroenterology 100: 1362–1370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Costamagna G, Mutignani M, Ingrosso M, Vamvakousis V, Alevras P, Manta R, Perri V (2001) Endoscopic treatment of postsurgical external pancreatic fistulas. Endoscopy 33: 317–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Telford JJ, Farrell JJ, Saltzman JR, Shields J, Banks P, Lichenstein DR, Johannes RS, Kelsey PB, Carr-Locke DL (2002) Pancreatic stent placement for duct disruption. Gastrointest Endosc 56: 18–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boerma D, Rauws EA, van Gulik TM, Huibregtse K, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2000) Endoscopic stent placement for pancreaticocutaneous fistula after surgical drainage of the pancreas. Br J Surg 87: 1506–1509

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saeed ZA, Ramirez FC, Hepps KS (1993) Endoscopic stent placement for internal and external pancreatic fistulas. Gastroenterology 105: 1213–1217

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rerknimitr R, Sherman S, Fogel EL, Bucksot L, Fay P, Shelly LA, Phillips S, Madura J, Howard T, Lehman GA (2000) Pancreatic duct leaks: results of endoscopic management (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc 51: AB139

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yeo CH, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Choti MA (2000) Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Ann Surg 232: 419–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Geenery GE, Russell RCG, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nicl N (2001) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37: 383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Low D, Hill L, Raltz S (1997) Transpapillary stenting for pancreaticocutaneous fistulas. J Gastrointest Surg 1: 357–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lau ST, Simchuk EJ, Kozarek RA, Traverso LW (2001) A pancreatic ductal leak should be sought to direct treatment in patients with acute pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 181: 411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, Nicaise N, Braude P, Van Yperen G, Cremer M, Struyven J (1997) Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MRI after secretin stimulation. Radiology 203: 435–444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Soto JA, Alvarez O, Munera F, Yepes NL, Sepulveda ME, Perez JM (2001) Traumatic disruption of the pancreatic duct: diagnosis with MR pancreatography. Am J Roentgenol 176: 175–178

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Arvanitakis M, Delhaye M, De Maertelaere V, Bali M, Winant C, Coppens E, Jeanmart J, Zalcman M, Van Gansbeke D, Deviere J, Matos C (2004) Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 126: 715–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bracher GA, Manocha AP, DeBanto JR, Gates LK, Slivka A, Whitcomb DC, Bleau BL, Ulrich CD II, Martin SP (1999) Endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting to treat pancreatic ascites. Gastrointest Endosc 49: 710–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith MT, Sherman S, Ikenberry SO, Hawes RH, Lehman GA (1996) Alterations in pancreatic ductal morphology following polyethylene pancreatic stent therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 268–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Turkey Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

    B. Cicek, E. Parlak, D. Oguz, S. Disibeyaz, A. S. Koksal & B. Sahin

Authors
  1. B. Cicek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Parlak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Oguz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Disibeyaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. S. Koksal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. B. Sahin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Cicek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cicek, B., Parlak, E., Oguz, D. et al. Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fistulas. Surg Endosc 20, 1706–1712 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0764-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0764-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation