Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preferred location for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma within a segment of intestinal metaplasia

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Barrett’s metaplasia is the predominant precursor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. This precancerous lesion has become the focus of various surveillance programs aimed at detecting earlier and therefore potentially curable lesions. However, sampling error by missing invasive cancer lesions is a common problem. This study aimed to identify preferred locations within a segment of Barrett’s mucosa for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

The study group consisted of 213 patients with histologically proven esophageal adenocarcinoma. Of those, there were 134 cases of early cancer and 79 cases of locally advanced lesions. These patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The frequency of intestinal metaplasia and the location of the tumor occurrence within the segment of intestinal metaplasia were assessed.

Results

Intestinal metaplasia was found in 83% of the early lesions and in 98% of the advanced tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In 82.2% of the cases, the tumor was located at the distal margin of the intestinal metaplasia in patients with early tumor manifestations. The remaining tumor mass after neoadjuvant therapy also was located predominantly at the distal margin of the segment of intestinal metaplasia (85% of the cases).

Conclusions

The results demonstrate that almost all adenocarcinomas of the esophagus are based on the development of a segment of intestinal metaplasia. The distal margin of Barrett’s mucosa seems to be the most vulnerable location for the development of invasive cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forastiere AA, Heitmiller RF, Klinkenberg L (1997) Multimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Chest 112: 195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirby TJ, Rice TW (1994) The epidemiology of esophageal carcinoma: the changing face of a disease. Chest Surg Clin North Am 4: 217–225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. DeCamp MM, Swanson SJ, Jaklitsch MT (1999) Esophagectomy after induction chemoradiation. Chest 116: 466–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Menke-Pluymers MB, Schoute NW, Mulder AH, Hop WC, van Blankenstein M, Tilanus HW (1992) Outcome of surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus. Gut 33: 1454–1458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stein HJ, Feith M, Mueller J, Werner M, Siewert JR (2000) Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Surg 232: 733–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Theisen J, Stein HJ, Dittler HJ, Feith M, Moebius C, Kauer WKH, Werner M, Siewert JR (2002) Preoperative chemotherapy unmasks underlying Barrett’s mucosa in patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. Surg Endosc 16: 671–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spechler SJ, Goyal RK (1986) Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med 315: 362–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tytgat GN (1997) Endoscopic features of the columnar lined esophagus. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 26: 507–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reid BJ, Weistein WM, Levin KJ, Haggit RC, VanDeventer G, DenBesten L (1988) Endoscopic biopsy can detect high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus without grossly recognizable neoplastic lesions. Gastroenterology 94: 81–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eckhardt VF, Kanzler G, Bernhard G (2001) Life expectancy and cancer risk in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a prospective controlled investigation. Am J Med 111: 33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McDonald CE, Wicks AC, Playford RJ (2000) Final results from 10-year cohort of patients undergoing surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus: observational study. BMJ 321: 1252–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peters JH, Clark GW, Ireland AP (1994) Outcome of adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett’s esophagus in endoscopically surveyed and nonsurveyed patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 108: 813–822

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, Stein HJ (2000) Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg 232: 353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Siewert JR, Stein HJ (1998) Classification of carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 85: 1457–1459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cameron AJ, Ott BJ, Payne WS (1985) The incidence of adenocarcinoma in columnar lined esophagus. N Engl J Med 313: 857–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hameetemann W, Tytgat GN, Houthoff HJ, van den Tweel JG (1989) Barrett’s esophagus: development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 96: 1249–1256

    Google Scholar 

  17. Williamson WA, Ellis FH Jr, Gribb SP, Shaian DM, Aretz HT, Heatley GJ (1991) Barrett’s esophagus: prevalence and incidence of adenocarcinoma. Arch Int Med 151: 2212–2216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Connor JB, Falk GW, Richter JE (1999) The incidence of adenocarcinoma and dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: report of the Cleveland Clinic Barrett’s esophagus registry. Am J Gastroenterol 94: 2037–2042

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bani-Hani K, Sue-Ling HM, Johnston D, Axon ATR, Martin IG (2000) Barrett’s esophagus: results from a 13-year surveillance programme. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 12: 649–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Canto IM, Setrakian S, Willis J, Chak A, Petras R, Powe NR, Sivak MB (2000) Methylene blue directed biospies improve detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 51: 560–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma P, Weston AP, Topalovski M, Cherian R, Bhattacharyya A, Sampliner RE (2003) Magnification chromoendoscopy for the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gut 52: 24–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ortner MA, Ebert B, Hein E, Zumbusch K, Nolte D, Sukowski U, Weber-Eibel J, Fleige B, Dietel M, Stolte M, Oberhuber G, Porschen R, Klump B, Hortnagel H, Lochs H, Rinneberg H (2003) Time-gated fluorescence spectroscopy in Barrett’s esophagus. Gut 52: 28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wallace MB, Perelman LT, Backman V, Crawford JM, Fitzmaurice M, Seiler M, Badizegan K, Shields SJ, Itzkan I, Dasari RR, van Dam J, Feld MS (2000) Endoscopic detection of dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using light-scattering spectroscopy. Gastroenterology 119: 677–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stein HJ, Hoeft S, DeMeester TR (1993) Functional foregut abnormalities in Barrett’s esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 105: 107–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fitzgerald RC, Omary MB, Triadiafilopoulos G (1996) Dynamic effects of acid on Barrett’s esophagus. J Clin Invest 98: 2120–2128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DeMeester SR, DeMeester TR (2000) Columnar mucosa and intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus: fifty years of controversy. Ann Surg 231: 303–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stein HJ, Kauer WKH, Feussner H, Siewert JR (1999) Bile acids as components of the duodenogastric refluxate: detection, relationship to bilirubin, mechanism of injury, and clinical relevance. Hepatogastroenterology 46: 66–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU Muenchen, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany

    J. Theisen, H. J. Stein, M. Feith, W. K. H. Kauer, H. J. Dittler, D. Pirchi & J. R. Siewert

Authors
  1. J. Theisen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. J. Stein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Feith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. W. K. H. Kauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. J. Dittler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Pirchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. R. Siewert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Theisen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Theisen, J., Stein, H.J., Feith, M. et al. Preferred location for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma within a segment of intestinal metaplasia. Surg Endosc 20, 235–238 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0187-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0187-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation