Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic and open gastric resections for malignant lesions: A prospective comparative study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Whereas laparoscopy for benign diseases provides clear advantages over traditional surgery, the benefits of laparoscopic gastric resection for malignant diseases are less clear. The objectives of this study were to compare prospectively the clinical outcomes between completely laparoscopic and open total and partial gastrectomies for malignant diseases and to assess whether laparoscopic gastrectomies obtain adequate margins and follow oncologic principles.

Methods

Between April 1995 and March 2004, a prospective comparative study was performed comparing eight patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy with 11 patients who underwent open total gastrectomy, and 16 patients who underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy with 17 who patients underwent open partial gastrectomy. Stage, extent of lymphadenectomy, and long-term follow-up were examined. The intraoperative and postoperative details of the two groups were compared.

Results

The laparoscopic group patients had fewer intraoperative complications while the operative time was similar to that of the open group. Both ambulation and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic groups than in the open groups. The short-term morbidity was lower in the laparoscopic groups and there were no cases of death, whereas one case of postoperative death occurred after an open total gastrectomy. There was no need to convert to open surgery. The number of lymph nodes obtained in the laparoscopic and open procedures was not significantly different. In addition, all resected margins were tumor free in the laparoscopic group, whereas tumor involvement was presented in the margin of one specimen in the open group.

Conclusions

The totally laparoscopic approach to total and partial gastrectomies had good results and was proven to be a feasible and safe procedure. In addition, the laparoscopic procedures are superior to open surgeries in terms of faster postoperative recovery, shorter hospital stay, and better cosmetic outcomes. A totally laparoscopic approach for early and advanced gastric cancer can obtain adequate margins and follow oncologic principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y Adachi T Suematsu A Shiraishi T Katsuta A Morimoto S Kitano K Akazawa (1999) ArticleTitleQuality of life after laparoscopy-assisted Billrot I gastrectomy Ann Surg 229 49–54 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199901000-00006 Occurrence Handle9923799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Y Adachi N Shiraishi A Shiromizu T Bandoh M Aramaki S Kitano (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy Arch Surg 135 806–810 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.135.7.806 Occurrence Handle10896374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. T Asao Y Hosouchi T Nakabayashi N Haga E Mochiki H Kuwano (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopically assisted total or distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer Br J Surg 88 128–132 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01618.x Occurrence Handle11136325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. JS Azagra M Georgen P De Simone ParticleDe J.L. Ibanez-Aguire (1999) ArticleTitleMinimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer Surg Endosc 13 351–357 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900988 Occurrence Handle10094746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JJ Bonenkamp J Songun J Hermans M Sasako K Welvaart JT Plukker P Van Elk IL Obertop DJ Gouma CW Taat (1995) ArticleTitleRandomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in Dutch patients Lancet 345 745–748 Occurrence Handle7891484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. EC Burke MS Karphen KC Conlon MF Bernan (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma Ann Surg 225 262–267 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199703000-00004 Occurrence Handle9060581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. HL Cheng WJ Lee IR Lai RH Yaun SC Yu (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic wedge resection of benign gastric tumor Hepatogastroenterology 46 2100–2104 Occurrence Handle10430405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A Cuschieri P Fayers J Fielding J Craven J Bancewicz V Joypaul P Cook (1996) ArticleTitlePostoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial Lancet 347 995–999 Occurrence Handle8606613

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A Cuschieri S Weeden J Fielding J Bancewicz J Craven V Joypaul M Sydes P Fayers (1999) ArticleTitlePatient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomised surgical trial Br J Cancer 79 1522–1530 Occurrence Handle10188901

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. PM Goh IB So (1999) ArticleTitleRole of laparoscopy in the management of stomach cancer Semin Surg Oncol 16 321–326 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199906)16:4<321::AID-SSU7>3.0.CO;2-F Occurrence Handle10332778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. CGS Huscher A Anastasi F Crafa A Recher MM Lirici (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic gastric resections Semin Laparosc Surg 7 26–54 Occurrence Handle10735915

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. PM Goh AZ Khan JB So D Lomanto WK Cheah R Muthiah A Gandhi (2001) ArticleTitleEarly experience with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11 83–87 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-200104000-00003 Occurrence Handle11330389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. YW Kim HS Han GD Fleischer (2003) ArticleTitleHand-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13 26–30 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00129689-200302000-00006 Occurrence Handle12598754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. S Kitano I Yasunori M Moriyama K Sugimachi (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic assisted Billroth I gastrectomy Surg Laparosc Endosc 4 146–148

    Google Scholar 

  15. S Kitano Y Adachi N Shiraishi T Suematsu T Bando (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy for early gastric carcinomas Surg Today 29 IssueID4 389–391 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005950050429 Occurrence Handle10211578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. S Kitano N Shiraishi K Fujii K Yasuda M Inomata Y Adachi (2002) ArticleTitleA randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: An interim report Surgery 131 S306–S311 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2002.120115 Occurrence Handle11821829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. MJ Kransa (1998) ArticleTitleAdvances in staging of esophageal carcinoma Chest 113 107–111

    Google Scholar 

  18. M Ohgami K Kumai Y Otani T Kubota M Kitajima (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic wedge resection of the stomach for early gstric cancer using a lesion-lifting method Dig Surg 11 64–67

    Google Scholar 

  19. FA Papay JM Stein JR Dietz M Luciano L Morales J Jr. Zins (1997) ArticleTitleEndoscopic approach for benign tumor ablation of the forehead and brow J Craniofac Surg 8 176–178 Occurrence Handle9482063

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. IE Petrakis NE Kogerakis IE Drositis KG Lasithotakis D Bouros GE Chalkiadakis (2004) ArticleTitleVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic empyema: primarily, or after fibrinolytic therapy failure? Am J Surg 187 471–474 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.048 Occurrence Handle15041493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. G Piskun JC Fleites GW Shaftan RJ Folger (1998) ArticleTitleA laparoscopic approach to posterior gastric wall leiomyomectomy J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8 75–78 Occurrence Handle9617966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. S Usui H Inoue T Yoshida N Fukami SE Kudo T Iwai (2003) ArticleTitleHand-assisted laparoscopic total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 15 304–307 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00129689-200310000-00002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N Shiraishi Y Adachi S Kitano T Bandoh T Katsuta A Morimoto (1999) ArticleTitleIndication for and outcome of laparoscopy-assisted Billrot I gastrectomy Br J Surg 86 541–544 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01083.x Occurrence Handle10215833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. M Takahama K Kushibe T Kawaguchi M Kimura S Taniguchi (2004) ArticleTitleVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a promising treatment for solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Chest 25 1144–1147 Occurrence Handle10.1378/chest.125.3.1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. KJ Weber CD Reyes M Gagner CM Divino (2003) ArticleTitleComparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for malignant disease Surg Endosc 17 968–971 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8738-5 Occurrence Handle12658427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Mitkal Sharon for valuable help in proofreading this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.–L. Dulucq.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dulucq, J., Wintringer, P., Stabilini, C. et al. Laparoscopic and open gastric resections for malignant lesions: A prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19, 933–938 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2172-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-2172-9

Keywords

Navigation