Abstract
Background
This review investigated the role played by laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct (LECBD) in the management of difficult choledocholithiasis.
Methods
This retrospective study reviewed a prospective database of LECBD for difficult choledocholithiasis during the period 1995 to 2003.
Results
Of the 97 LECBDs performed in the authors’ center from 1995 to 2003, 25 were performed for difficult choledocholithiasis. Difficult choledocholithiasis was defined as failure of endoscopic stone retrieval for the following reasons: access and cannulation difficulty, the difficult nature of common bile duct (CBD) stones, and the presence of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related complications. There were seven unsuccessful cannulations because of previous gastrectomy (n = 5) and periampullary diverticulum (n = 2). Among the 18 patients with failed endoscopic extraction, there were 10 impacted stones, 2 incomplete stone clearances after multiple attempts, 2 type 2 Mirizzi syndromes, 1 proximal stent migration, 1 repeated post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1 situs inversus, and 1 stricture at the distal common bile duct. There were 14 male and 11 female patients with a mean age of 67.8 ± 15 years. Initial presentations included cholangitis (n = 14, 56%), biliary colic (n = 3, 12%), jaundice/deranged liver function (n = 5, 20%), cholecystitis (n = 2, 8%), and pancreatitis (n = 1, 4%). Regarding the approach for LECBD, there were 2 transcystic duct explorations and 23 choledochotomies. The mean operative time was 149.4 ± 49.3 min, and there were three conversions (12%). The stone clearance rate was 100%, and no recurrence was detected during a mean follow-up period of 16.8 months. Five complications were encountered, which included bile leak (3 patients) and wound infection (2 patients). When the results were compared with the remaining 72 LECBDs for nondifficult stones during the same period, the complication rate, conversion rate, and rate of residual stones were similar despite a longer operation time (149.4 ± 49.4 min vs 121.6 ± 50.5 min).
Conclusion
When ERCP is impossible or stone retrieval is incomplete, LECBD is the solution to difficult CBD stones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C-S Chang-Chien (1987) ArticleTitleDo juxtapapillary diverticula of the duodenum interfere with cannulation at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 33 298–300 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FgsFKrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0016-5107(87)71602-2
L Courvoiser (1890) ArticleTitleCasuistisch: Statististische beitrage zur pathologie und chirurgie der gallenwege. Vogel 387 57–58
A Cuschieri E Lezoche M Morino E Crace A Lacy J Toouli et al. (1999) ArticleTitleEAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13 952–957 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlslGisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901145
F Dubois G Berthelot H Levard (1989) ArticleTitleCholecystectomy by coelioscopy. Presse Medicale 18 980–982 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M3ps1Olsg%3D%3D
RE England DF R Martin (1997) ArticleTitleEndoscopic management of Mirizzi syndrome. Gut 40 272–276 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3isFKjsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/gut.40.2.272
ST Fan ECS Lai FPT Mok et al. (1993) ArticleTitleEarly treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med 328 228–232 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s7hs1yisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199301283280402
K Gottlieb S Sherman GA Lehman (1996) ArticleTitleTherapeutic biliary endoscopy. Endoscopy 28 113–130 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2007-1005424
ECS Lai FPT Mok ESY Tan et al. (1992) ArticleTitleEndoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med 326 1582–1586 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383mtFKktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199206113262401
LF Lin CP Siauw KS Ho JC Tung (1999) ArticleTitleERCP in post-Billroth II gastrectomy patients: emphasis on technique. Am J Gastroenterol 94 144–148 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7jtFCntg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00785.x
JH Lipschutz DF Canal RH Hawes TA Ruffolo MA Besold GA Lehman (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy and ERCP with sphincterotomy in an elderly patient with situs inversus. Am J Gastroenterol 87 218–220 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387jtlGksw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1531164
DN Lobo TW Balfour SY Iftikhar (1998) ArticleTitlePeriampullary diverticula: consequences of failed ERCP. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80 326–331 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fms1WqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9849331 Occurrence Handle2503106
RH Meade (1968) The development of surgery of the gallbladder and the bile ducts. RH Meade (Eds) Introduction to the history of general surgery. WB Saunders Philadelphia 223–237
JP Neoptolemos NJ London D James et al. (1988) ArticleTitleControlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet ii 979–983 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90740-4
M Rhodes L Sussman Cohen MP Lewis (1998) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351 159–161 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7htFGhsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09175-7
TC Simmons (1991) ArticleTitleDistal common bile duct stricture and secondary biliary cirrhosis due to choledocholithiasis. J Natl Med. Assoc 83 1105–1108 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383mtVGlsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1813643 Occurrence Handle2571677
GV Stiegmann JS Goff A Mansour et al. (1992) ArticleTitlePrecholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration. Am J Surg 163 227–230 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387lt1eksw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(92)90106-2
B Suc J Escat D Cherqui G Fourtanier JM Hay A Fingerhut et al. (1998) ArticleTitleSurgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile ductstones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 133 702–708 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czltFarsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.7.702
CN Tang WT Siu JPY Ha MKW Li (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: an effective drainage procedure for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis Surg Endosc . . Occurrence Handle12874693
SE Tranter MH Thompson (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89 1495–1504 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38noslWquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02291.x
RP Venu JE Geenen WJ Hogan GK Johnson AJ Taylor ET Stewart A Jackson (1985) ArticleTitleERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with situs inversus. Gastrointest Endosc 31 338–340 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL28%2Fgs1WktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0016-5107(85)72220-1
J Wong CN Tang CH Chau YW Luk MKW Li (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy and exploration of common bile duct in a patient with situs inversus. Surg Endosc 15 218 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vktlSgtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12200663
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tai, C.K., Tang, C.N., Ha, J.P.Y. et al. Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 18, 910–914 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8216-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8216-8