Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This review investigated the role played by laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct (LECBD) in the management of difficult choledocholithiasis.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed a prospective database of LECBD for difficult choledocholithiasis during the period 1995 to 2003.

Results

Of the 97 LECBDs performed in the authors’ center from 1995 to 2003, 25 were performed for difficult choledocholithiasis. Difficult choledocholithiasis was defined as failure of endoscopic stone retrieval for the following reasons: access and cannulation difficulty, the difficult nature of common bile duct (CBD) stones, and the presence of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related complications. There were seven unsuccessful cannulations because of previous gastrectomy (n = 5) and periampullary diverticulum (n = 2). Among the 18 patients with failed endoscopic extraction, there were 10 impacted stones, 2 incomplete stone clearances after multiple attempts, 2 type 2 Mirizzi syndromes, 1 proximal stent migration, 1 repeated post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1 situs inversus, and 1 stricture at the distal common bile duct. There were 14 male and 11 female patients with a mean age of 67.8 ± 15 years. Initial presentations included cholangitis (n = 14, 56%), biliary colic (n = 3, 12%), jaundice/deranged liver function (n = 5, 20%), cholecystitis (n = 2, 8%), and pancreatitis (n = 1, 4%). Regarding the approach for LECBD, there were 2 transcystic duct explorations and 23 choledochotomies. The mean operative time was 149.4 ± 49.3 min, and there were three conversions (12%). The stone clearance rate was 100%, and no recurrence was detected during a mean follow-up period of 16.8 months. Five complications were encountered, which included bile leak (3 patients) and wound infection (2 patients). When the results were compared with the remaining 72 LECBDs for nondifficult stones during the same period, the complication rate, conversion rate, and rate of residual stones were similar despite a longer operation time (149.4 ± 49.4 min vs 121.6 ± 50.5 min).

Conclusion

When ERCP is impossible or stone retrieval is incomplete, LECBD is the solution to difficult CBD stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C-S Chang-Chien (1987) ArticleTitleDo juxtapapillary diverticula of the duodenum interfere with cannulation at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 33 298–300 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1c%2FgsFKrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0016-5107(87)71602-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. L Courvoiser (1890) ArticleTitleCasuistisch: Statististische beitrage zur pathologie und chirurgie der gallenwege. Vogel 387 57–58

    Google Scholar 

  3. A Cuschieri E Lezoche M Morino E Crace A Lacy J Toouli et al. (1999) ArticleTitleEAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13 952–957 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlslGisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. F Dubois G Berthelot H Levard (1989) ArticleTitleCholecystectomy by coelioscopy. Presse Medicale 18 980–982 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M3ps1Olsg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. RE England DF R Martin (1997) ArticleTitleEndoscopic management of Mirizzi syndrome. Gut 40 272–276 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3isFKjsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/gut.40.2.272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. ST Fan ECS Lai FPT Mok et al. (1993) ArticleTitleEarly treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med 328 228–232 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s7hs1yisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199301283280402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K Gottlieb S Sherman GA Lehman (1996) ArticleTitleTherapeutic biliary endoscopy. Endoscopy 28 113–130 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2007-1005424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ECS Lai FPT Mok ESY Tan et al. (1992) ArticleTitleEndoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med 326 1582–1586 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383mtFKktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199206113262401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. LF Lin CP Siauw KS Ho JC Tung (1999) ArticleTitleERCP in post-Billroth II gastrectomy patients: emphasis on technique. Am J Gastroenterol 94 144–148 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7jtFCntg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00785.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. JH Lipschutz DF Canal RH Hawes TA Ruffolo MA Besold GA Lehman (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy and ERCP with sphincterotomy in an elderly patient with situs inversus. Am J Gastroenterol 87 218–220 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387jtlGksw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1531164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DN Lobo TW Balfour SY Iftikhar (1998) ArticleTitlePeriampullary diverticula: consequences of failed ERCP. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80 326–331 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fms1WqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9849331 Occurrence Handle2503106

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. RH Meade (1968) The development of surgery of the gallbladder and the bile ducts. RH Meade (Eds) Introduction to the history of general surgery. WB Saunders Philadelphia 223–237

    Google Scholar 

  13. JP Neoptolemos NJ London D James et al. (1988) ArticleTitleControlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet ii 979–983 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90740-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M Rhodes L Sussman Cohen MP Lewis (1998) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351 159–161 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7htFGhsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09175-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. TC Simmons (1991) ArticleTitleDistal common bile duct stricture and secondary biliary cirrhosis due to choledocholithiasis. J Natl Med. Assoc 83 1105–1108 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK383mtVGlsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1813643 Occurrence Handle2571677

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. GV Stiegmann JS Goff A Mansour et al. (1992) ArticleTitlePrecholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration. Am J Surg 163 227–230 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK387lt1eksw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(92)90106-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. B Suc J Escat D Cherqui G Fourtanier JM Hay A Fingerhut et al. (1998) ArticleTitleSurgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile ductstones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 133 702–708 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czltFarsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.7.702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. CN Tang WT Siu JPY Ha MKW Li (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: an effective drainage procedure for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis Surg Endosc . . Occurrence Handle12874693

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. SE Tranter MH Thompson (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg 89 1495–1504 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38noslWquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02291.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. RP Venu JE Geenen WJ Hogan GK Johnson AJ Taylor ET Stewart A Jackson (1985) ArticleTitleERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with situs inversus. Gastrointest Endosc 31 338–340 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL28%2Fgs1WktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0016-5107(85)72220-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. J Wong CN Tang CH Chau YW Luk MKW Li (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy and exploration of common bile duct in a patient with situs inversus. Surg Endosc 15 218 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vktlSgtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12200663

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. N. Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tai, C.K., Tang, C.N., Ha, J.P.Y. et al. Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct in difficult choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 18, 910–914 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8216-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8216-8

Keywords

Navigation