Skip to main content
Log in

A scoring system to predict the need for liver transplantation for biliary atresia after Kasai portoenterostomy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A retrospective analysis was performed of the records of 133 patients with extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA) who had undergone a Kasai portoenterostomy. The patients were divided into a non-transplantation group who survived but did not receive liver transplantation after the procedure and a failure group of those who died or received liver transplantation. A score was calculated that assessed nine factors, including laboratory values and complications. The data were assessed at the time complications occurred. The scores were analysed by a trend analysis to see if serial scores predicted the evolution of liver disease. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to assess the optimal cut-point for the scoring system. There were 98 patients in the non-transplantation group and 35 in the failure group. The latter group had significantly higher post-operative bilirubin (9.3±7.2 mg/dl versus 3.5±3.1 mg/dl), ALT (136±89 U/l versus 92±88 U/l), prothrombin time, and incidence of cirrhosis, ascites, oesophageal varices, portal hypertension, cholangitis and sepsis than the non-transplantation group ( P <0.05). A score of ≥8 had a high sensitivity (96.9%) and specificity (89.5%) for predicting the need for liver transplant. Conclusion:based on easily available clinical information, our scoring system can predict which patients with biliary atresia who have already undergone a Kasai procedure should be considered for liver transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EHBA :

extrahepatic biliary atresia

ROC :

receiver operating characteristic

References

  1. Altman RP, Lilly JR, Greenfield J, Weinberg A, van Leeuwen K, Flanigan L (1997) A multiple risk factors analysis of the portoenterostomy (Kasai) procedure for biliary atresia. Twenty-five years of experience from two centers. Ann Surg 226: 348–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carceller A, Blanchard H, Alvarez F, St-Vil D, Bensoussan AL, Di Lorenzo M (2000) Past and future of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 35: 717–720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Karrer FM, Price MR, Bensard DD, Sokol RJ, Narkewicz MR, Smith DJ, Lilly JR (1996) Long-term results with the Kasai operation for biliary atresia. Arch Surg 131: 493–496

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kasai M, Mochizuki I, Ohkohchi N, Chiba T, Ohi R (1989) Surgical limitation for biliary atresia: indication for liver transplantation. J Pediatr Surg 24: 851–854

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lipsett PA, Segev DL, Colombani PM (1997) Biliary atresia and biliary cysts. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 11: 619–641

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miyano T, Fujimoto T, Ohya T, Shimomura H (1993) Current concept of the treatment of biliary atresia. World J Surg 17: 332–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohhama Y, Shinkai M, Fujita S, Nishi T, Yamamoto H (2000) Early predication of long-term survival and the timing of liver transplantation after the Kasai operation. J Pediatr Surg 35: 1031–1034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohi R, Chiba T, Mochizuki I (1988) Long term follow-up of patients with biliary atresia. Conference on mechanisms and management of pediatric hepatobiliary disease, Arlington, VA, 96

  9. Okazaki T, Kobayashi H, Yamataka A, Lane GJ, Miyano T (1999) Long-term post-surgical outcome of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 34: 312–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Otte JB, de Ville de Goyet J, Reding R, Hausleithner V, Sokal E, Chardot C, Debande B (1994) Sequential treatment of biliary atresia with Kasai portoenterostomy and liver transplantation: a review. Hepatology 20: 41S–48S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryckman F, Fisher R, Pedersen S, Dittrich V, Heubi J, Farrell M, Balistreri W, Ziegler M (1993) Improved survival in biliary atresia in the present era of liver transplantation. J Pediatr Surg 28: 382–386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryckman FC, Alonso MH, Bucuvalas JC, Balistreri WF (1998) Biliary atresia: surgical management and treatment options as they relate to outcome. Liver Transplant Surg 4: S24–S33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vacanti JP, Shamberger RC, Eraklis A, Lillehei CW (1990) The therapy of biliary combining the Kasai portoenterostomy with liver transplantation: a single center experience. J Pediatr Surg 25: 149–152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wood RP, Langnas AN, Stratta RJ, Pillen TJ, Williams L, Lindsay S, Meiergerd D, Shaw BW Jr (1990) Optimal therapy for patients with biliary atresia: portoenterostomy versus primary transplantation. J Pediatr Surg 25: 153–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hung-Chang Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, CB., Lee, HC., Yeung, CY. et al. A scoring system to predict the need for liver transplantation for biliary atresia after Kasai portoenterostomy. Eur J Pediatr 162, 603–606 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-003-1268-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-003-1268-x

Keywords

Navigation