Skip to main content
Log in

Robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy (RACE procedure) using a single port combined with a transhiatal approach in a rendezvous technique: a case series

  • How-I-Do-It article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Difficulties in thoracic access and the risk of pulmonary complications are major problems in esophageal surgery. Transhiatal techniques have been described to avoid the thoracic approach, but their oncological radicality continues to be questioned. A combination of a cervical and transhiatal approach, however, appears promising. We describe the technique of a robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy (RACE procedure), combined with a transhiatal approach in a rendezvous technique.

Methods

The da Vinci Xi® robotic system was docked in a single port technique via a cervical approach. The upper third of the esophagus and the surrounding lymphatic tissue was dissected thoracically. Subsequently, the system was docked abdominally to allow us to completely dissect the esophagus in the rendezvous procedure.

Results

The patients (n = 4) suffered no trauma or injury to surrounding structures during the procedure, and sensitive structures were preserved. Almost no robot arm collision occurred, and the arms did not contact the patients’ head or shoulders. No patient converted to conventional robotic-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy. Complications included anastomotic leakage (n = 1), transient palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 1).

Conclusions

The cervical approach to esophagectomy allows comfortable preparation and facilitates transhiatal access, while the rendezvous procedure enables easy identification of the cranial dissection plane. The degrees of freedom of movement of the robotic instruments allow for precise and controlled preparation, and the latest technology minimizes the risk of robot arm collision in single-excision surgery. This combined, robot-assisted approach appears to be a promising procedure for esophagectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kutup A, Nentwich MF, Bollschweiler E, Bogoevski D, Izbicki JR, Hölscher AH (2014) What should be the gold standard for the surgical component in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Surg 260:1016–1022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Watanabe M, Yoshida N, Karashima R, Sato N, Hirashima K, Imamura Y, Hiyoshi Y, Nagai Y, Iwagami S, Toyama E, Hayashi N, Baba H (2009) Transcervical superior mediastinal lymph node dissection combined with transhiatal lower esophageal dissection before transthoracic esophagectomy: a safe approach for salvage esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 208(4):e7–e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujiwara H, Shiozaki A, Konishi H, Kosuga T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, Otsuji E (2015) Single-port mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve. Ann Thorac Surg 100(3):1115–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Egberts JH, Stein H, Aselmann H, Hendricks A, Becker T (2017) Fully robotic da Vinci Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in four-arm technique-problems and solutions. Dis Esophagus 30(12):1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mori K, Yamagata Y, Aikou S, Nishida M, Kiyokawa T, Yagi K, Yamashita H, Nomura S, Seto Y (2016) Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional trans-thoracic surgery. Dis Esophagus 29(5):429–434

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are given to Deborah Nock (Medical WriteAway, Norwich, UK) for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-Hendrik Egberts.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Jan-Hendrik Egberts and Jan-Hendrik Beckmann are paid by Intuitive Surgery for proctoring surgical teams. Thomas Becker received a research grant by Intuitive SurgeryTM. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from patient for publication of this report and any associated images and videos.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

(MP4 464,438 kb)

Abdominal phase: Transhiatal dissection of the esophagus und gastrolysis with DII lymphadenectomy (MP4 471,048 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Egberts, JH., Schlemminger, M., Hauser, C. et al. Robot-assisted cervical esophagectomy (RACE procedure) using a single port combined with a transhiatal approach in a rendezvous technique: a case series. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404, 353–358 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01785-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01785-y

Keywords

Navigation