Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Selection of an optimal surgical technique for inguinal hernia repair, allowing safe performance and rapid recovery without long-term complaints, may contribute significantly to the reduction of national health care costs.

Methods

An analysis of current literature regarding surgical techniques, properties of modern meshes, operative complications, recurrence rates, occurrence of chronic pain, and quality of life after different surgical procedures was made. Evidence-based comparisons of suture and mesh techniques of open mesh and laparoscopic mesh repair and of laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) operation were made.

Results

Recurrence rates after mesh implantation are significantly lower than after suture repair. Recurrence rates after flat open mesh repair are similar to those of laparoscopic techniques, but there is a significantly faster recovery after laparoscopy, and chronic pain is also present less frequently. Both TAPP and TEP are acceptable treatment options, but there is insufficient evidence to show superiority of one technique over the other. Material-reduced meshes seem to have advantages, at least during the early postoperative period. Besides the properties of the mesh implanted, the surgical technique applied and the skills of the surgeon performing the operation are the most important factors for achieving optimal and cost-efficient results.

Conclusion

With regard to recovery and occurrence of chronic pain, TAPP and TEP are superior to open mesh repair in most cases. Greater efforts should be undertaken to make laparoscopic repair easier, safer, and less expensive. If this can be achieved, health care costs could ultimately be reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matthews RD, Neumayer L (2008) Inguinal hernia in the 21st century: an evidence-based review. Curr Probl Surg 45:261–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S, Nordin P, Schumpelick V, Smedberg S, Smietanski M, Weber G, Miserez M (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paul A, Troidl H, Williams JI, Rixen D, Langen R (1994) Randomized trial of modified Bassini versus Shouldice inguinal hernia repair. The Cologne Hernia Study Group. Br J Surg 81:1531–1534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Simons MP, Kleijnen J, van Geldere D, Hoitsma HF, Obertop H (1996) Role of the Shouldice technique in inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of controlled trials and a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 83:734–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shouldice E (1953) The treatment of hernia. Ontario Med Rev 20:670–684

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schumpelick V (1996) Reparation nach Shouldice. In: Schumpelick V (ed) Hernien, 3rd edn. Enke, Stuttgart, pp 147–154

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arlt G (2009) Shouldice reparation. In: Obermaier R, Pfeffer F, Hopt UT (eds) Hernienchirurgie, 1st edn. Elsevier, München, pp 52–59

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, Poucher J, Hennet H, Habib E, Veyrières M, Flamant Y (1995) Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients. Ann Surg 222:719–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Schwab R, Peiper Ch, Binnebösel M, Schenten F, Schumpelick V (2006) Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis. Hernia 10:309–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. EU Hernia Trialist Cooperation (2000) Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87:860–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vrijland WW, van den Tol MP, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Busschbach JJ, de Lange DC, van Geldere D, Rottier AB, Vegt PA, IJzermans JN, Jeekel J (2002) Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 89:293–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Butters M, Redecke J, Köninger J (2007) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. Br J Surg 94:562–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van Veen RN, Wijsmuller AR, Vrijland WW, Hop WC, Lange JF, Jeekel J (2007) Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 94:506–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2010) Groin hernia repair in young males: mesh or sutured repair? Hernia 14:467–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rives J, Lardennois B, Flament JB, Convers G (1973) The Dacron mesh sheet, Treatment of choice of inguinal hernias repair in adults. Apropos of 183 cases. Chirurgie 99:564–575

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Usher FC, Ochsner J, Ll T Jr (1958) Use of marlex mesh in the repair of incisional hernias. Am Surg 24:969–974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Read RC (2005) The contributions of Usher and others to the elimination of tension from groin herniorrhaphy. Hernia 9(3):208–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lichtenstein IL (1970) Hernia repair without disability. CV Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reuben B, Neumayer L (2006) Surgical management of inguinal hernia. Adv Surg 40:299–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, Hakakha M (1995) The goals of modern hernia surgery. How to achieve them: open or laparoscopic repair? Probl Gen Surg 12:165–171

    Google Scholar 

  21. Amid PK (2004) Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles. Hernia 8:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gai HG (2009) Lichtenstein Methode. In: Obermaier R, Pfeffer F, Hopt UT (eds) Hernienchirurgie, 1st edn. Elsevier, München, pp 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stoppa RE, Quintyn M (1969) Deficiencies of the abdominal wall in aged persons. Sem Hop 45:2182–2184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stoppa RE, Rives JL, Warlaumont CR, Palot JP, Verhaeghe PJ, Delattre JF (1984) The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North Am 64:269–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Leibl BJ (2002) Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1062–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bittner R, Leibl B, Jäger C, Kraft B, Ulrich M, Schwarz J (2006) TAPP-Stuttgart technique and results of a large single center series. J Min Access Surg 3:155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tamme C, Köckerling F (2005) Standard-Technik total extraperitoneale Hernioplastik (TEP). In: Bittner R, Leibl BJ, Ulrich M (eds) Chirurgie der Leistenhernie, 1st edn. Karger, Freiburg, pp 126–139

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bittner R, Schmedt C-G, Leibl BJ (2003) Transabdominal pre-peritoneal approach. In: LeBlanc (ed), Laparoscopic Hernia Surgery. 1st ed, Arnold, London, pp 53–64.

  29. Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Kraft B, Bittner R (2001) Laparoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair of incarcerated hernias: Is it feasible? Results of a prospective study. Surg Endosc 15:1179–1183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Ulrich M, Bittner R (2000) Scrotal hernias: a contraindication for an endoscopic procedure? Results of a single-institution experience in transabdominal preperitoneal repair. Surg Endosc 14:289–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Bittner R (2009) Laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) after radical prostatectomy: is it safe? Results of prospectively collected data of more than 200 cases. Surg Endosc 23:973–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leibl BJ, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Ulrich M, Bittner R (2000) Recurrence after endoscopic transperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP): causes, reparative techniques, and results of the reoperation. J Am Coll Surg 190:651–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Boekeler U, Bittner R (2010) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in bilateral hernia repair? Results of more than 2800 patients in comparison to literature. Surg Endosc 24:3026–3030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, Dudai M, Ferzli GS, Fitzgibbons RJ, Fortelny RH, Klinge U, Kockerling F, Kuhry E, Kukleta J, Lomanto D, Misra MC, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Reinpold W, Rosenberg J, Sauerland S, Schug-Pass C, Singh K, Timoney M, Weyhe D, Chowbey P (2011) Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia (International Endohernia Society [IEHS]). Surg Endosc 25:2773–2843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Amid PK, Hiatt JR (2007) New understanding of the causes and surgical treatment of postherniorrhaphy inguinodynia and orchalgia. J Am Coll Surg 205:381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bittner R, Gmähle E, Gmähle B, Schwarz J, Aasvang E, Kehlet H (2010) Lightweight mesh and noninvasive fixation: an effective concept for prevention of chronic pain with laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). Surg Endosc 24:2958–2964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wake BL, McCormack K, Fraser C, Vale L, Perez J, Grant AM (2005) Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD004703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McCormack K, Wake BL, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systemic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schrenk P, Woisetschlager R, Rieger R, Wayand W (1996) Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 83:1563–1566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt CG (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs. Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:605–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimbäck G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 92:1085–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg 164:965–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Berndsen FH, Petersson U, Arvidsson D, Leijonmarck CE, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Montgomery A, SMIL Study Group (2007) Discomfort five years after laparoscopic and Shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomised trial with 867 patients. A report from the SMIL study group. Hernia 11:307–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90:1479–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2007) Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 21:161–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs. Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19:188–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Strate T, Mann O, Izbicki JR (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh hernia repair. N Engl J Med 351:1463–1465, author reply 1463–1465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, Kunelius P, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (2004) Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties. Surg Endosc 18:518–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LA, Rudberg CR (2009) Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 249:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Langeveld HR, van’t Riet M, Weidema WF, Stassen LP, Steyerberg EW, Lange J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2010) Total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair compared with Lichtenstein (the LEVEL-Trial): a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 251:819–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Eklund A, Rudberg C, Leijonmarck CE, Rasmussen I, Spangen L, Wickbom G, Wingren U, Montgomery A (2007) Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair. Surg Endosc 21:634–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kouhia ST, Huttunen R, Silvasti SO, Heiskanen JT, Ahtola H, Uotila-Nieminen M, Kiviniemi VV, Hakala T (2009) Lichtenstein hernioplasty versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia—a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 249:384–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK (2010) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 97:4–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Dedemadi G, Sgourakis G, Radtke A, Dounavis A, Gockel I, Fouzas I, Karaliotas C, Anagnostou E (2010) Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Am J Surg 200:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Aasvang EK, Gmaehle E, Hansen JB, Gmaehle B, Forman JL, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Kehlet H (2010) Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain. Anesthesiology 112:957–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. McCarthy M Jr, Jonasson O, Chang CH, Pickard AS, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs J, Edelman P, Fitzgibbons R, Neumayer L (2005) Assessment of patient functional status after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 201:171–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Eklund A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C, Swedish Multicentre Trial of Inguinal Hernia Repair by Laparoscopy (SMIL) study group (2010) Chronic pain 5 years after randomized comparison of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 97:600–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO, Hurley M (2010) Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. World J Surg 34:3059–3064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Eklund A, Carlsson P, Rosenblad A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C, Swedish Multicentre Trial of Inguinal Hernia Repair by Laparoscopy (SMIL) study group (2010) Long-term cost-minimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 97:765–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gholghesaei M, Langeveld HR, Veldkamp R, Bonjer HJ (2005) Costs and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs. open tension-free repair: a review. Surg Endosc 19:816–821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2003) A cost–utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1,513,008 adult patients. Surg Endosc 17:180–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Klinge U, Klink CD, Klosterhalfen B (2010) The “ideal” mesh—more than a mosquito net. Zentralbl Chir 135:168–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Bringman S, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, Deprest J, Junge K, Klosterhalfen B, Parra-Davila E, Ramshaw B, Schumpelick V (2010) Hernia repair: the search for ideal meshes. Hernia 14:81–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U (2005) The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med Devices 2:103–117, Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Brown CN, Finch JG (2010) Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:272–278, Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Klosterhalfen B, Hermanns B, Rosch R (2003) Biological response to mesh. Eur Surg 35:16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Gao M, Han J, Tian J, Yang K (2010) Vypro II mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 251:838–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D (2004) Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 91:44–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Bringman S, Wollert S, Österberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Heikkinen TJ (2006) Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 93:1056–1059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Paajanen H (2007) A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three composite meshes on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair in local anesthesia. Hernia 11:335–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Koch A, Bringman S, Myrelid P, Smeds S, Kald A (2008) Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard prolene mesh. Br J Surg 95:1226–1231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Polish Hernia Study Group, Smietanski M (2008) Randomized clinical trial comparing a polypropylene with polyglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty. Br J Surg 95:1462–1468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Paradowski T, Olejarz A, Kontny T, Lukasiewicz J, Sledzinski Z, Smietanska I, Smietanski M (2009) Polypropylene vs. ePTFE vs. WN mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair—a prospective, randomized, double blind pilot study of one-year follow-up. Videosurgery 4:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  76. Nikkolo C, Lepner U, Murruste M, Vaasna T, Seepter H, Tikk T (2010) Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernioplasty. Hernia 14:253–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Silvestre AC, de Mathia GB, Fagundes DJ, Medeiros LR, Rosa MI (2011) Shrinkage evaluation of heavyweight and lightweight polypropylene meshes in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Hernia (in press)

  78. Bringmann S, Wollert S, Österberg J, Heikkinen TJ (2005) Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and Vyproll-mesh in bilateral endoscopic extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP). Surg Endosc 19:536–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Heikkinen TJ, Wollert S, Österberg J, Smedberg S, Bringman S (2006) Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and Vyproll-mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) of recurrent unilateral hernias. Hernia 10:34–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Langenbach MR, Schmidt J, Zirngibl H (2006) Comparison of biomaterials: three meshes and TAPP for inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 20:1511–1157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Agarval BB, Agarval KA, Mahajan KC (2009) Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy- and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Surg Endosc 23:242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Chui LB, Ng WT, Sze YS, Yuen KS, Wong YT, Kong CK (2010) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 24:2735–2738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Chowbey PK, Garg N, Sharma A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Mittal T (2010) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc 24:3073–3079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Leibl BJ, Schwarz J (2011) Early postoperative and one year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of extralight titanized polypropylene mesh and traditional heavyweight polypropylene mesh on pain and seroma production in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). World J Surg 35(8):1791–1797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Bittner R, Leibl BJ, Kraft B, Schwarz J (2011) One-year results of a prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing four meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). Hernia 15(5):503–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Bittner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bittner, R., Schwarz, J. Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397, 271–282 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0875-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0875-7

Keywords

Navigation