Skip to main content
Log in

Morbidity and mortality conference as part of PDCA cycle to decrease anastomotic failure in colorectal surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Morbidity and Mortality meetings are an accepted tool for quality management in many hospitals. However, it is not proven whether these meetings increase quality. It was the aim of this study to investigate whether Morbidity and Mortality meetings as part of a PDCA cycle (Plan, Do, Check, Act) can improve the rate of anastomotic failure in colorectal surgery.

Materials and methods

From January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2009, data for all anastomotic failures in patients operated on for colorectal diseases in the Department of Surgery (Klinikum Friedrichshafen, Germany) were prospectively collected. The events were discussed in Morbidity and Mortality meetings. On the basis of these discussions, a strategy to prevent anastomotic leaks and a new target were defined (i.e. ‘Plan’). This strategy was implemented in the following period (i.e. ‘Do’) and results were prospectively analysed. A new strategy was established when the results differed from the target, and a new standard was defined when the target was achieved (i.e. ‘Check, Act’).

Results

The year 2004 was set as the base year. In 2005 and 2006, new strategies were established. Comparing this period with the period of strategy conversion (2007–2009), we found a significant decrease in the anastomotic failure rate in colorectal surgery patients (5.7% vs 2.8%; p = 0.05), whereas the risk factors for anastomotic failure were unchanged or unfavourable.

Conclusions

If Morbidity and Mortality meetings are integrated in a PDCA cycle, they can decrease anastomotic failure rates and improve quality of care in colorectal surgery. Therefore, the management tool ‘PDCA cycle’ should be considered also for medical issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veldenz HC, Dovgan PS, Schinco MS, Tepas JJ (2001) Morbidity and mortality conference: enhancing delivery of surgery residency curricula. Curr Surg 58:580–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hutter MW, Rowell KS, Devaney LA, Sokal SM, Warshaw AL, Abbott WM, Hodin RA (2006) Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 203:618–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller DC, Filson CP, Wallner LP, Montie JE, Campbell DA, Wei JT (2006) Comparing performance of morbidity and mortality conference and national surgical quality improvement program for detection of complications after urologic surgery. Urology 68:931–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deming WE (2000) Out of the crisis, 1st edn. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Zippel R, Geissler S, Pross M, Roessner A, Köckerling F (2002) Flächendeckende chirurgische Qualitätssicherung. Chirurg 73:138–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolters U, Bollschweiler E, Ekkernkamp A, Hölscher AH (2002) Zum Stand der Risikoevaluation an Kliniken in Deutschland. Chirurg 73:1205–1212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pierliussi E, Fischer MA, Campbell AR, Landefeld CS (2003) Discussion of medical errors in morbidity and mortality conferences. JAMA 290:2838–2842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gore DC (2006) National survey of surgical morbidity and mortality conferences. Am J Surg 191:708–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Büchler MW (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu AW, Folkmann S, McPhee SJ, Lo B (1991) Do house officers learn from their mistakes? JAMA 265:2089–2094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenfeld JC (2005) Using the morbidity and mortality conference to teach and assess the ACGME general competencies. Curr Surg 62:664–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbau J-M, Pocard M, Valleur PV (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MR, Hong CW, Yoon SN, Lim S-B, Park KJ, Park J-G (2006) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer. Hepato-Gastroenterol 53:682–686

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peeters KCM, Tollenar RAEM, Marijnen CAM, Klein Kranenarg E, Steup KH, Wiggers I, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJH (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mäkelä JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S (2003) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:653–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peeters KCM, van de Velde CJH (2005) Surgical quality assurance in rectal cancer treatment: the key to improved outcome. EJSO 31:630–635

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi DH, Jeong WK, Lim S-W, Chung TS, Park J-I, Lim S-B, Choi HS, Nam B-H, Chang HJ, Jeong S-Y (2009) Learning curves for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy used to manage curable sigmoid colon cancer: single-institute, three-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 23:622–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y, Saito N (2009) Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:403–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eberl T, Jagoditsch M, Klingler A, Tschmelitsch J (2008) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Am J Surg 196:592–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jestin P, Pahlman L, Gunnarson U (2008) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case control study. Color Dis 10:715–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M, Rutegard J, Sjödahl R (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 6:462–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, Chen JS, Chen HH, Chiang JM, Tang R (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after anterior resection in rectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 241:9–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T, Kirkeby LT, Skovdal J, Vennits B, Wille-Jorgensen P (1999) Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 86:927–931

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H (2006) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg 202:439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Biondo S, Pares D, Kreisler E, Rague JM, Fraccalvieri D, Ruiz AG, Jaurrietta E (2005) Anastomotic dehiscence after resection and primary anastomosis in left-sided colonic emergencies. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2272–2280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt O, Merkel S, Hohenberger W (2003) Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing. EJSO 29:239–243

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Folkesson J, Nilsson J, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarson U (2004) The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Color Dis 6:275–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Holte K, Andersen J, Hjort Jacobsen D, Kehlet H (2009) Cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors and the risk of anastomotic leakage after fast track colonic surgery. Br J Surg 96:650–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Vogel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogel, P., Vassilev, G., Kruse, B. et al. Morbidity and mortality conference as part of PDCA cycle to decrease anastomotic failure in colorectal surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396, 1009–1015 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0820-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0820-9

Keywords

Navigation