Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a fast-track protocol in a high-volume center for patients with pancreatic disorders.

Background

The concept of fast-track surgery allowing accelerated postoperative recovery is accepted in colorectal surgery, but efficacy data are only preliminary for patients undergoing major pancreatic surgery. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a modified fast-track protocol in a high-volume center for patients with pancreatic disorders.

Methods

Between February 2005 and January 2010, 145 subjects had resective pancreatic surgery and were enrolled in the program. Essential features of the program were no preanaesthetic medication, upper and lower air-warming device, avoidance of excessive i.v. fluids perioperatively, effective control of pain, early reinstitution of oral feeding, and immediate mobilization and restoration of bowel function following surgery. Outcome measures were postoperative complications such as pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, biliary leak, intra-abdominal abscess, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, acute pancreatitis, wound infection, 30-day mortality, postoperative hospital stay, and readmission rates.

Results

On average, patients were discharged on postoperative day 10 (range 6–69), with a 30-day readmission rate of 6.2%. Percentage of patients with at least one complication was 38.6%. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage occurred in seven of 101 pancreatico-jejunostomies, and biliary leak in three of 109 biliary jejunostomies. Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in ten (6.9%) patients and wound infection in nine (6.2%) cases. In-hospital mortality was 2.7%. Fast-track parameters, such as normal food and first stool, correlated significantly with early discharge (<0.05). At multivariate analysis, lack of jaundice, and resumption of normal diet by the 5th postoperative day were independent factors of early discharge.

Conclusion

Fast-track programs are feasible, easy, and also applicable for patients undergoing a major surgery such as pancreatic resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NSAID:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

ISGPS:

International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery

References

  1. Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006 Oct 18; (4): CD004080

  2. Karliczek A, Jesus EC, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wiggers T (2006) Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 8:259–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kehlet H, Dahal JB (2003) Anaesthesia, surgery and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 362:1921–1928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Minowada G, Welch WJ (1995) Clinical implication of the stress response. J Clin Invest 95:3–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kehlet H (1991) The surgical stress response: should it be prevented? Can J Surg 34:565–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bessey PQ (1995) Metabolic response to critical illness. In: Wilmore DW, Cheung LY, Harken AH, Holcroft JW, Meakins JL (eds) Scientific American surgery. Scientific American INC, New York, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hill GL, Douglas RG, Schroeder D (1993) Metabolic basis for the management of patients undergoing major surgery. World J Surg 17:144–153

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kehlet H (2008) Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet 371:791–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, Nygren J, Hausel J, Soop M, Andersen J, Kehlet H (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, Uhl W, Friess H, Z’Graggen K (2003) Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 138:1310–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Neoptolemos JP, Russel RC, Bramhall S, Theis B (1997) Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1,026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg 84:1370–1376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Balcom JHT, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C (2001) Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resection: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg 136:391–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Ord SE, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Zahurak ML, Grochow LB, Abrams RA (1997) Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 226:248–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, de Haan RJ, de Wit LT, Busch OR, Obertop H (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berberat PO, Ingold H, Gulbinas A, Kleeff J, Müller MW, Gutt C, Weigand M, Friess H, Büchler MW (2007) Fast track—different implications in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 11:880–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M, Rocchetti S, Beneduce AA, Di Carlo V (2008) Fast- track recovery programme after pancreatico-duodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. Br J Surg 95:1387–1393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bullingham A, Strunin L (1995) Prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism. Br J Anaesth 75:622–630

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sagar PM, Kruegener G, MacFie J (1992) Nasogastric intubation and elective abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 79:1127–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL (1995) A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 221:469–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rowbotham DJ, Smith G (1992) Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 69(suppl1):1–68

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Büchler M, For the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fungerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Z’graggen K, Uhl W, Friess H, Büchler MW (2002) How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:733–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Büchler MW, Seiler CM (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 245:187–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hartel M, Wente MN, Hinz U, Kleeff J, Wagner M, Müller MW, Friess H, Büchler MW (2005) Effect of antecolic reconstruction on delayed gastric emptying after the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure. Arch Surg 140:1094–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Muller MW, Friess H, Beger HG, Kleeff J, Lauterburg B, Glasbrenner B, Riepl RL, Büchler MW (1997) Gastric emptying following pylorus-preserving Whipple and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg 173:257–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, IRCCS - Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, 71013, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

    Pierluigi di Sebastiano, Leonardina Festa, Antonio De Bonis & F. Francesco di Mola

  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, IRCCS - Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, 71013, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

    Andrea Ciuffreda

  3. Unit of Biostatistics, IRCCS - Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

    Maria Rosa Valvano

  4. Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS - Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

    Angelo Andriulli

Authors
  1. Pierluigi di Sebastiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leonardina Festa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antonio De Bonis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Ciuffreda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria Rosa Valvano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Angelo Andriulli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. F. Francesco di Mola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierluigi di Sebastiano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

di Sebastiano, P., Festa, L., De Bonis, A. et al. A modified fast-track program for pancreatic surgery: a prospective single-center experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396, 345–351 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0707-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-010-0707-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation