Abstract
Background
It is matter of discussion if quick parathyroid hormone (QPTH) monitoring is helpful in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and “localized single-gland disease” (SGD; concordant sestamibi and ultrasound results) to further increase the rate of success (permanent normocalcemia) of performing selective parathyroidectomy by minimally invasive parathyroid exploration (MIP). The aim of this study was to evaluate if a randomized controlled trial was justified in order to clarify this discussion.
Materials and methods
The prospective database of patients with sporadic PHPT, SGD, MIP, and QPTH monitoring (1999–2005) was evaluated regarding the “conversion rate” to bilateral exploration and permanent normocalcemia (“QPTH” group). Retrospectively, the patients were analyzed a second time “without” applying QPTH monitoring (“non-QPTH” group). Statistical differences between both groups were calculated (McNemar’s test).
Results
By definition, 338 patients with “localized SGD” underwent MIP. MIP was finished in 308 (91.1%) patients. Five of 308 patients (1.6%) showed persisting (n = 1) or recurrent disease (n = 4). In 30 of 338 patients (8.9%), a conversion to bilateral exploration was necessary (false preoperative localization 15 patients—one patient not cured; multiple-gland disease correctly indicated by QPTH monitoring 15 patients—one patient not cured). Analyzing the “non-QPTH” group, 14 additional patients showed persisting disease. Thus, without using QPTH monitoring, the rate of persisting PHPT would increase from 0.9% (three patients) to 5.0% (17 patients; p = 0.0005).
Conclusion
Intraoperative QPTH assay seems necessary even in patients with “localized SGD” by two techniques in an endemic goiter region. Abandoning QPTH monitoring would more than double the rate of persisting disease. A randomized trial seems not to be justified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Udelsman R (2002) Six hundred fifty-six consecutive explorations for primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg 235:670, discussion 70–72. doi:10.1097/00000658-200205000-00008
Ruda JM, Hollenbeak CS, Stack BC Jr (2005) A systematic review of the diagnosis and treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism from 1995 to 2003. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:359–372. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.10.005
Gurnell EM, Thomas SK, McFarlane I, Munday I, Balan KK, Berman L, Chatterjee VK, Wishart GC (2004) Focused parathyroid surgery with intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement as a day-case procedure. Br J Surg 91:78–82. doi:10.1002/bjs.4463
Prager G, Czerny C, Ofluoglu S, Kurtaran A, Passler C, Kaczirek K, Scheuba C, Niederle B-A (2003) Impact of localization studies on feasibility of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy in an endemic goiter region. J Am Coll Surg 196:541–548. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01897-5
Udelsman R, Donovan PI (2004) Open minimally invasive parathyroid surgery. World J Surg 28:1224–1226. doi:10.1007/s00268-004-7600-4
Riss P, Kaczirek K, Heinz G, Bieglmayer C, Niederle B (2007) A “defined baseline” in PTH monitoring increases surgical success in patients with multiple gland disease. Surgery 142:398–404. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.004
Prager G, Czerny C, Kurtaran A, Passler C, Scheuba C, Bieglmayer C, Niederle B (2001) Minimally invasive open parathyroidectomy in an endemic goiter area: a prospective study. Arch Surg 136:810–816. doi:10.1001/archsurg.136.7.810
Carneiro-Pla DM, Solorzano CC, Lew JI, Irvin GL 3rd (2008) Long-term outcome of patients with intraoperative parathyroid level remaining above the normal range during parathyroidectomy. Surgery 144:989–993, discussion 93–94. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2008.08.026
Barczynski M, Cichon S, Konturek A, Cichon W (2006) Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy versus open minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for a solitary parathyroid adenoma: a prospective, randomized, blinded trial. World J Surg 30:721–731. doi:10.1007/s00268-005-0312-6
Gawande AA, Monchik JM, Abbruzzese TA, Iannuccilli JD, Ibrahim SI, Moore FD Jr (2006) Reassessment of parathyroid hormone monitoring during parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism after 2 preoperative localization studies. Arch Surg 141:381–384, discussion 4. doi:10.1001/archsurg.141.4.381
Mihai R, Palazzo FF, Gleeson FV, Sadler GP (2007) Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy without intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg 94:42–47. doi:10.1002/bjs.5574
Pang T, Stalberg P, Sidhu S, Sywak M, Wilkinson M, Reeve TS, Delbridge L (2007) Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy using the lateral focused mini-incision technique without intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring. Br J Surg 94:315–319. doi:10.1002/bjs.5608
Stalberg P, Sidhu S, Sywak M, Robinson B, Wilkinson M, Delbridge L (2006) Intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: does it “value-add” to decision-making? J Am Coll Surg 203:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.03.022
Bieglmayer C, Prager G, Niederle B (2002) Kinetic analyses of parathyroid hormone clearance as measured by three rapid immunoassays during parathyroidectomy. Clin Chem 48:1731–1738
Riss P, Kaczirek K, Bieglmayer C, Niederle B (2007) PTH spikes during parathyroid exploration-a possible pitfall during PTH monitoring? Langenbecks Arch Surg 392:427–430. doi:10.1007/s00423-006-0125-6
Yen TW, Wilson SD, Krzywda EA, Sugg SL (2006) The role of parathyroid hormone measurements after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 140:665–672, discussion 72–74. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.006
Toniato A, Casara D, Pelizzo M (2008) The negative sestamibi scan: is a minimally invasive parathyroidectomy still possible? Ann Surg Oncol 15:378–379, discussion 80–81. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9645-8
Sukan A, Reyhan M, Aydin M, Yapar AF, Sert Y, Canpolat T, Aktas A (2008) Preoperative evaluation of hyperparathyroidism: the role of dual-phase parathyroid scintigraphy and ultrasound imaging. Ann Nucl Med 22:123–131. doi:10.1007/s12149-007-0086-z
Wong KK, Brown RK, Avram AM (2008) Potential false positive tc-99m sestamibi parathyroid study due to uptake in brown adipose tissue. Clin Nucl Med 33:346–348. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e31816a795a
Goetze S, Lavely WC, Ziessman HA, Wahl RL (2008) Visualization of brown adipose tissue with 99mtc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile on spect/ct. J Nucl Med 49:752–756. doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.048074
Siperstein A, Berber E, Barbosa GF, Tsinberg M, Greene AB, Mitchell J, Milas M (2008) Predicting the success of limited exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism using ultrasound, sestamibi, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone: analysis of 1158 cases. Ann Surg 248:420–428
De Pasquale L, Gobatti D, Ravini ML, Barassi A, Porreca W, Melzi d'Eril GV, Bastagli A (2008) Intra-operative testing for parathyroid hormone: the central laboratory option. J Endocrinol Invest 31:62–67
Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, Ambrosini CE, Fregoli L, Donatini G (2008) Endoscopic bilateral neck exploration versus quick intraoperative parathormone assay (qPTHa) during endoscopic parathyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:398–400. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9408-4
Zettinig G, Kurtaran A, Prager G, Kaserer K, Dudczak R, Niederle B (2002) “Suppressed” double adenoma—a rare pitfall in minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Horm Res 57:57–60. doi:10.1159/000057949
Westerdahl J, Bergenfelz A (2006) Parathyroid surgical failures with sufficient decline of intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels: unobserved multiple endocrine neoplasia as an explanation. Arch Surg 141:589–594. doi:10.1001/archsurg.141.6.589
Acknowledgement
The study was supported by the “Jubiläumsfonds der Österreichischen Nationalbank” Grant 9307.
Special thanks to Dietmar Tamandl, MD, for his critical revision of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
“Best of Endocrine Surgery in Europe 2009”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riss, P., Scheuba, C., Asari, R. et al. Is minimally invasive parathyroidectomy without QPTH monitoring justified?. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394, 875–880 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0505-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0505-9