Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a new option in the treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Rectocele and distal intussusception are organic causes of outlet obstruction. A new surgical option called the stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) is described within a prospective study.

Patients and methods

Fourteen patients with symptomatic rectocele (four females), rectocele with coexistent intussusception (eight females), and intussusception (two males) underwent STARR procedure. The symptoms were measured by means of a defecation score (0–20 points).

Results

Complications included local bleeding postoperatively in two cases, and temporary ischuria in four cases. The subjective sense of pain was low; from day 1 postoperatively five patients did not need any analgetics. Only one female patient had prolonged pelvic pain, without any organic reason. All patients showed improvement in rectal evacuation. The mean score of defecation (0–20 points) decreased from 13±3 to 4±3 after 1 month (p<0.05) and remained low. The overall follow-up was 19±9 months. Only one male patient with intussusception had defecation disorder again 6 months after surgery. Three patients had temporary urge incontinence.

Conclusion

STARR is an effective therapy for obstructive defecation disorder due to a symptomatic rectocele and/or a distal intussusception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ho YH, Tan M, Goh HS (1996) Clinical and physiologic effects of biofeedback in outlet obstruction constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 39:520–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ommer A, Köhler A, Athanasiadis S (1998) Funktionsdiagnostik des Anorektums und des Beckenbodens. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 123:537–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mellgren A, Anzen B, Nilsson BY, Johansson C, Dolk A, Gillgren P, Bremmer S, Holmstrom B (1995) Results of rectocele repair. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 38:7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ommer A, Köhler A, Athanasiadis S (1998) Ergebnisse der transperinealen Levatorplastik bei der Behandlung der symptomatischen Rektocele. Chirurg 69:966–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Calabro G, Trompetto M, Ganio E, Tessera G, Bottini C, Pulvirenti D’Urso A, Ayabaca S, Pescatori M (2001) Which surgical approach for rectocele? A multicentric report from Italian coloproctologists. Tech Coloproctol 5:149–156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Athanasiadis S, Heiligers J (1993) Der Wert der abdominalen Rektopexie bei obstruktiven Defäkationsstörungen- Eine prospektive Studie mittels eines Defäkationsindexes, Manometrie und Radiologie. Langenbeck’s Arch Chir 378:92–101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Graf W, Karlbom U, Pahlman L, Nilsson S, Ejerblad S (1996) Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception. Eur J Surg 162:905–911

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liberman H, Hughes C, Dippolito A (2000) Evaluation and outcome of the Delorme procedure in the treatment of rectal outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 43:188–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Araki Y, Ishibashi N, Kishimoto Y, Matono K, Nakagawa M, Nozoe Y, Sasatomi T, Ogata Y, Shirouzu K (2001) Circular stapling procedure for mucosal prolapse of the rectum associated with outlet obstruction. Kurume Med J 48:201–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proc. of 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 777–784

  11. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A, Bottini C, Caviglia A, Carriero A, Mascagni D, Mauri R, Sofo L, Landolfi V (2004) Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1285–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlback SO, Holmstrom B (1994) Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1133–1141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson JR, Chen AH, Pettit PD, Bridges MD (2002) Incidence of occult rectal prolapse in patients with clinical rectoceles and defecatory dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1494–1499; discussion 1499–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goh JT, Tjandra JJ, Carey MP (2002) How could management of rectoceles be optimized? ANZ J Surg 72:896–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Segal JL, Karram MM (2002) Evaluation and management of rectoceles. Curr Opin Urol 12:345–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karlbom U, Graf W, Nilsson S, Pahlman L (1996) Does surgical repair of a rectocele improve rectal emptying? Dis Colon Rectum 39:1296–1302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollak J, Davila GW (2003) Rectocele repair: the gynecologic approach. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 16:61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Watson SJ, Loder PB, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (1996) Transperineal repair of symptomatic rectocele with Marlex mesh: a clinical, physiological and radiologic assessment of treatment. J Am Coll Surg 183:257–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ho YH, Ang M, Nyam D, Tan M, Seow-Choen F (1998) Transanal approach to rectocele repair may compromise anal sphincter pressures. Dis Colon Rectum 41:354–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vermeulen J, Lange JF, Sikkenk AC, Harst Evd (2005) Anterolateral rectopexy for correction of rectoceles leads to good anatomical but poor functional results. Tech Coloproctol 9:35–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Felt-Bersma RJ, Luth WJ, Janssen JJ, Meuwissen SG (1990) Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders. Which findings are clinically relevant? Dis Colon Rectum 33:277–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi JS, Salum MR, Moreira H Jr, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2000) Physiologic and clinical assessment of patients with rectoanal intussusception. Tech Coloproctol 4:29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwandner O, Poschenrieder F, Gehl HB, Bruch HP (2004) Differenzialdiagnostik der Beckenbodeninsuffizienz. Chirurg 75:850–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Virjee J, Mortensen NJ, Locke-Edmunds JC (1988) An analysis of rectal morphology in obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McCue JL, Thomson JP (1990) Rectopexy for internal rectal intussusception. Br J Surg 77:632–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Orrom WJ, Bartolo DC, Miller R, Mortensen NJ, Roe AM (1991) Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 34:1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Christiansen J, Zhu BW, Rasmussen OO, Sorensen M (1992) Internal rectal intussusception: results of surgical repair. Dis Colon Rectum 35:1026–1028; discussion 1028–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Berman IR, Harris MS, Rabeler MB (1990) Delorme’s transrectal excision for internal rectal prolapse. Patient selection, technique, and three-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 33:573–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sielezneff I, Malouf A, Cesari J, Brunet C, Sarles JC, Sastre B (1999) Selection criteria for internal rectal prolapse repair by Delorme’s transrectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 42:367–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Salamina G, Cesana BM, Bernasconi F, Roviaro G (2004) New trends in the surgical treatment of outlet obstruction: clinical and functional results of two novel transanal stapled techniques from a randomised controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:359–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Chirurgie und Zentrum für Minimal Invasive Chirurgie, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evang. Huyssens Stiftung, Henricistr. 92, 45136, Essen, Germany

    A. Ommer, K. Albrecht, F. Wenger & M. K. Walz

Authors
  1. A. Ommer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Albrecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Wenger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. K. Walz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ommer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ommer, A., Albrecht, K., Wenger, F. et al. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a new option in the treatment of obstructive defecation syndrome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391, 32–37 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0004-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0004-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation