Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evolution of vitreomacular adhesion to acute vitreofoveal separation with special emphasis on a traction-induced foveal pathology. A prospective study of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the evolution of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) to acute vitreofoveal separation with particular emphasis on cases involving the underlying fovea.

Methods

In this observational case series, of 192 cases in the VMA stage, 51 progressed to acute vitreofoveal separation; this subgroup was divided into those with normal separation (Group I) and those with co-existing macular findings (Group II). All patients were examined using spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at regular three-month intervals. We recorded the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the vitreomacular angle of the VMA (nasally and temporally), the horizontal diameter of the VMA, the macular thickness, the integrity of the photoreceptor layer and of the external limiting membrane. The Amsler grid test was used in the intermediate examinations in cases where patients developed symptoms.

Results

Out of the 51 cases in the VMA stage, 45 (88.2%) progressed to normal spontaneous vitreofoveal separation, while six (11.8%) developed findings of the fovea, such as macular thinning (two cases), an anomalous foveal contour (two cases), a macular tissue defect (one case) and vitreous separation from only the temporal side of the VMA in one case. Foveal findings were the same during the follow-up period in all but one case in which improvement was noted. Differences in BCVA between baseline measurements, those made immediately after vitreofoveal separation, and those made during final examination were not statistically significant. For the whole sample of our study (51 cases), the mean observation time at the VMA stage was 21.8 ±10.6 months, while the mean follow-up time after vitreofoveal separation was 9.7 ±4.9 months. In cases that developed incidents from the fovea, the mean observation time from the baseline to the last examination before vitreofoveal separation was 16.5 ±11.2 months and the mean follow-up time from the diagnosis of vitreofoveal separation to the final examination was 8.5 ±4.4 months.

Conclusions

VMA, excepting its progression to vitreomacular traction or spontaneous release, in a subset of patients can also cause findings associated with the fovea, concomitantly with vitreofoveal separation. Vitreofoveal separation can induce unilateral anatomic distortion of the fovea accompanied by symptoms, such as metamorphopsia or micropsia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bishop PN (2000) Structural macromolecules and supramolecular organization of the vitreous gel. Prog Retin Eye Res 19:323–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sebag J (2009) Vitreous: the resplendent enigma. Br J Ophthalmol 93:989–991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uchino E, Uemura A, Ohba N (2001) Initial stages of posterior vitreous detachment in healthy eyes of older persons evaluated by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1475–1479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson MW (2005) Perifoveal vitreous detachment and its macular complications. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 103:537–567

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sebag J (2004) Anomalous posterior vitreous detachment: a unifying concept in vitreo-retinal disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:690–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Girach A, Pakola S (2012) Vitreomacular interface diseases. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and future treatment options. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 7:311–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson TL, Nicod E, Simpson A, Angelis A, Grimaccia F, Kanavos P (2013) Symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion. Retina 33:1503–1511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson MW (2010) Posterior vitreous detachment: evolution and complications of its early stages. Am J Ophthalmol 149:371–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reese AB, Jones IS, Cooper WC (1967) Macular changes secondary to vitreous traction. Am J Ophthalmol 64:544–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Trempe CL (1995) Course of vitreomacular traction syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 119:55–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spaide RF, Wong D, Fisher Y, Goldbaum M (2002) Correlation of vitreous attachment and foveal deformation in early macular hole states. Am J Ophthalmol 133:226–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen TC, Cense B, Pierce MC et al (2005) Spectral domain optical coherence tomography: ultra-high speed, ultra-high resolution ophthalmic imaging. Arch Ophthalmol 123:1715–1720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bottόs J, Elizalde J, Arevalo JF, Rodrigues EB, Maia M (2012) Vitreomacular traction syndrome. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 7:148–161

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stalmans P, Duker JS, Kaiser PK et al (2013) Oct-based interpretation of the vitreomacular interface and indications for pharmacologic vitreolysis. Retina 33:2003–2011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S et al (2013) The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology 120:2611–2619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koizumi H, Spaide RF, Fisher YL et al (2008) Three-dimensional evaluation of vitreomacular traction and epiretinal membrane using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 145:509–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DeCroos FC, Toth CA, Folgar FA et al (2012) Characterization of vitreoretinal interface disorders using OCT in the interventional phase 3 trials of ocriplasmin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:6504–6511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. John VJ, Flynn HW Jr, Smiddy WE et al (2014) Clinical course of vitreomacular adhesion managed by initial observation. Retina 34:442–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Theodossiadis GP, Grigoropoulos VG, Theodoropoulou S, Datseris I, Theodossiadis PG (2014) Spontaneous resolution of vitreomacular traction demonstrated by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 157:842–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaudric A, Haouchine B, Massin P, Paques M, Blain P, Erginay A (1999) Macular hole formation: new data provided by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 117:744–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma F, Arcinue CA, Barteselli G et al (2014) Optical coherence tomography findings of the vitreoretinal interface in asymptomatic fellow eyes of patients with acute posterior vitreous detachment. Retina 34:447–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Witkin AJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS, Reichel E, Duker JS (2006) Vitreofoveal attachment causing metamorphopsia: an ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography finding. Retina 26:1085–1087

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Theodossiadis PG, Theodossiadis GP, Charonis A, Emfietzoglou I, Grigoropoulos VG, Liarakos VS (2011) The photoreceptor layer as a prognostic factor for visual acuity in the secondary epiretinal membrane after retinal detachment surgery: imaging analysis by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 151:973–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grigoropoulos VG, Theodossiadis GP, Theodossiadis PG (2011) Association of the preoperative photoreceptor layer defect as assessed by optical coherence tomography with the functional outcome after macular hole closure: a long follow-up study. Ophthalmologica 225:47–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Theodossiadis PG, Grigoropoulos VG, Theodossiadis GP (2011) The significance of the external limiting membrane in the recovery of photoreceptor layer after successful macular hole closure: a study by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica 225:176–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Syed YY, Dhillon S (2013) Ocriplasmin: a review of its use in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion. Drugs 73:1617–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Smet MD, Gandorfer A, Stalmans P et al (2009) Microplasmin intravitreal administration in patients with vitreomacular traction scheduled for vitrectomy: the MIVI I trial. Ophthalmology 116:1349–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stalmans P, Benz MS, Gandorfer A, Kampik A, Girach A, Pakola S, Haller JA, MIVI-TRUST Study Group (2012) Enzymatic vitreolysis with ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular holes. N Engl J Med 367:606–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weng CY, Fortun JA, Carvounis PE, Albini TA (2014) Ocriplasmin and its role in the management of vitreoretinal interface disorders. Int Ophthalmol Clin 54:29–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sebag J (2009) Pharmacologic vitreolysis–premise and promise of the first decade. Retina 29:871–874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

There is no need of Clinical Trials.gov registration, as this study is not a trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 2nd Department of Ophthalmology, Henry Dunant Hospital, 13 Lykiou street, 10674, Athens, Greece

    George P. Theodossiadis

  2. 2nd Eye Clinic “Ophthalmiatrion” Athinon Eye Hospital, Athens, Greece

    Irini P. Chatziralli

  3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Theodoros N. Sergentanis

  4. Ophthalmological Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Ioannis Datseris

  5. 2nd Department of Ophthalmology “Attikon” Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Panagiotis G. Theodossiadis

Authors
  1. George P. Theodossiadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irini P. Chatziralli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Theodoros N. Sergentanis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ioannis Datseris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Panagiotis G. Theodossiadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George P. Theodossiadis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Theodossiadis, G.P., Chatziralli, I.P., Sergentanis, T.N. et al. Evolution of vitreomacular adhesion to acute vitreofoveal separation with special emphasis on a traction-induced foveal pathology. A prospective study of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253, 1425–1435 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2826-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2826-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation