Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-year canaloplasty outcomes for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: European study results

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To report 3-year results investigating the safety and efficacy of canaloplasty, a procedure involving circumferential viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal and tensioning of the inner canal wall to treat open-angle glaucoma.

Methods

This was a prospective, multi-center, interventional study of 109 eyes of 109 adult, open-angle glaucoma patients undergoing canaloplasty or combined cataract-canaloplasty surgery. Qualifying preoperative intraocular pressures (IOP) were at least 16 mmHg with historical IOPs of at least 21 mmHg with or without medical therapy. A flexible microcatheter was used to viscodilate the full circumference of the canal and to place a trabecular tensioning suture. Primary outcome measures included IOP, glaucoma medication usage, and adverse events.

Results

Eyes with canaloplasty showed a mean baseline IOP of 23.0 ± 4.3 mmHg and mean glaucoma medication usage of 1.9 ± 0.7 medications, which decreased to a mean IOP of 15.1 ± 3.1 mmHg on 0.9 ± 0.9 medications at 3 years postoperatively. Eyes with combined cataract-canaloplasty surgery showed a mean baseline IOP of 24.3 ± 6.0 mmHg on 1.5 ± 1.2 medications, which decreased to a mean IOP of 13.8 ± 3.2 mmHg on 0.5 ± 0.7 medications at 3 years. Intraocular pressure and medication use results for all study eyes were significantly decreased from baseline (p <0.00001) at all intervals. Late postoperative complications included cataracts (19.1%) and transient IOP elevation (1.8%).

Conclusions

Canaloplasty demonstrated significant and sustained IOP reductions accompanied by an excellent short- and long-term safety profile in adult patients with open-angle glaucoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Godfrey DG, Fellman RL, Neelakantan A (2009) Canal surgery in adult glaucomas. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:116–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, Chiou AG, Hediguer SE, Mermoud A (1996–1997) Deep sclerectomy: results with and without collagen implant. Int Ophthalmol 20:157–62

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ambresin A, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A (2002) Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in one eye compared with trabeculectomy in the other eye of the same patient. J Glaucoma 11:214–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stegmann R, Pienaar A, Miller D (1999) Viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma in black African patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:316–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kearney JR, Ball SF, Field MW, Cameron BD (2006) Circumferential viscodilation of Schlemm’s canal with a flexible microcannula during non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. Digit J Ophthalmol 12:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, Koerber N, Kearney JR, Shingleton B, Samuelson TW (2007) Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm's canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults: interim clinical study analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1217–1226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, Koerber N, Kearney JR, Shingleton B, Samuelson TW (2009) Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults: two-year interim clinical study results. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:814–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grieshaber MC, Fraenkl S, Schoetzau A, Flammer J, Orgül S (2010) Circumferential viscocanalostomy and suture canal distension (canaloplasty) for whites with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma (Epub ahead of print)

  9. Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M, Koerber N, Kearney JR, Shingleton BJ, Samuelson TW (2011) Canaloplasty: Three-year results of circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Sur 37:682–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL, pp 241–265

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fahrmeir L, Tutz G (2001) Multivariate statistical modeling based on generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 260–297

    Google Scholar 

  12. King AJ, Rotchford AP, Alwitry A, Moodie J (2007) Frequency of bleb manipulations after trabeculectomy surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 91:873–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sunaric-Megevand G, Leuenberger PM (2001) Results of viscocanalostomy for primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 132:221–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yalvac IS, Sahin M, Eksioglu U, Midillioglu IK, Aslan BS, Duman S (2004) Primary viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma: three-year prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:2050–2057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilmour DF, Manners TD, Devonport H, Varga Z, Solebo AL, Miles J (2009) Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma: 4-year prospective randomized clinical trial. Eye 23:1802–1807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Galassi F, Giambene B (2008) Deep sclerectomy with SkGel implant: 5-year results. J Glaucoma 17:52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bissig A, Rivier D, Zaninetti M, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A, Roy S (2008) Ten years follow-up after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. J Glaucoma 17:680–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Russo V, Scott IU, Stella A, Balducci F, Cosma A, Barone A, Delle Noci N (2008) Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant versus punch trabeculectomy: a prospective clinical trial. Eur J Ophthalmol 18:751–757

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, Cillino G, Lodato G (2008) Deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy with low-dosage mitomycin C: four-year follow-up. Ophthalmologica 222:81–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peckar CO, Körber N (2008) Canaloplasty for open-angle glaucoma: a three years critical evaluation and comparison with viscocanalostomy. Spektrum Augenheikd 22:240–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R (2003) Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in white adults affected by open-angle glaucoma: a 2-year randomized, controlled trial. Ophthalmology 110:882–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jampel HD, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR, Wright MW, Guire KE, CIGTS group (2005) Perioperative complications of trabeculectomy in the CIGTS. Am J Ophthalmol 140:16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP (2002) The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. III. Early and late complications. Eye 16:297–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bindlish R, Condon GP, Schlosser JD, D’Antonio J, Lauer KB, Lehrer R (2002) Efficacy and safety of mitomycin-C in primary trabeculectomy, five-year follow-up. Ophthalmology 109:1336–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carassa RB, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R (1998) Viscocanalostomy: a pilot study. Eur J Ophthalmol 8:57–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Drüsedau MUH, von Wolff K, Bull H, von Barsewich B (2000) Viscocanalostomy for primary open-angle glaucoma; the Gross Pankow experience. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1367–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taube AB, Niemela P, Alm A (2009) Trabeculectomy with an active postoperative regimen: results and resource utilization. Acta Opthalmol 87:524–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dahan E, Drusedau MU (2000) Nonpenetrating filtration surgery for glaucoma: control by surgery only. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:695–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pisella PJ, Poluiquen P, Baudouin C (2002) Prevalence of ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and preservative free glaucoma medication. Br J Ophthalmol 86:418–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mendrinos E, Mermoud A, Shaarawy T (2008) Nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 53:592–630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Khaw PT, Siriwardena D (1999) “New” surgical treatments for glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 83:1–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. D’Eliseo D, Pastena B, Longanesi L, Grisanti F, Negrini V (2003) Comparison of deep sclerectomy with implant and combined glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmologica 217:208–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, Calvaruso L, Morreale D, Vadala M, Lodato G (2004) Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy with or without phacoemulsification: a randomized clinical trial. J Glaucoma 13:500–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wishart MS, Shergill T, Porooshani H (2002) Viscocanalostomy and phacoviscocanalostomy: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:745–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stangos AN, Mavropoulos A, Sunaric-Megevand G (2007) Phacoviscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma with concomitant age-related cataract. Clin Ophthalmol 1:497–504

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wishart MS, Dagres E (2006) Seven-year follow-up of combined cataract extraction and viscocanalostomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:2043–2049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to recognize Dr. Robert Stegmann, Pretoria, South Africa, who was instrumental in the development of canaloplasty.

Financial Support

The sponsor, iScience Interventional Corporation, Menlo Park, California, participated in the design of the study, data monitoring, and data management. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow Graefe’s Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review the data if requested.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Tetz acknowledges a consulting agreement with iScience Interventional Corporation. Dr. Koerber, Dr. von Wolff, and Dr. Bull have no conflicting interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt von Wolff.

Additional information

Clinical trial registration site and number: http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN12425531; ISRCTN12425531

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Esm 1

(DOC 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bull, H., von Wolff, K., Körber, N. et al. Three-year canaloplasty outcomes for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: European study results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249, 1537–1545 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1728-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1728-3

Keywords

Navigation