Abstract
Purpose
To compare endophthalmitis rates after 20-gauge versus 23-gauge versus 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in 2007–2008, and compare the rates with those of 2005–2006.
Methods
Multicenter study including all patients who developed endophthalmitis following PPV performed by any of the authors during 2005–2008, and all patients who developed endophthalmitis following PPV at Penn State College of Medicine and Bascom Palmer Eye Institute during 2005–2008. The endophthalmitis rates after 20-gauge, 23-gauge and 25-gauge PPV during 2007–2008 were compared to those from 2005–2006.
Results
The endophthalmitis incidence during 2007–2008 was 1/4,403 (0.02%) for 20-gauge PPV, 1/3,362 (0.03%) for 23-gauge PPV, and 1/789 (0.13%) for 25-gauge PPV. There is no significant difference among these rates between any two of the three groups. Compared with the endophthalmitis rates among the same group of surgeons during 2005–2006, the 2007–2008 endophthalmitis rates following 20-gauge and 23-gauge PPV were stable, and the rate following 25-gauge PPV was marginally lower (p = 0.056; odds ratio = 0.15; 95% CI: (0.003, 1.03)).
Conclusions
There was no significant difference in the 2007–2008 rates of endophthalmitis following 20-gauge versus 23-gauge versus 25-gauge PPV; among the same group of surgeons, the 2007–2008 rate of endophthalmitis following 25-gauge PPV was marginally lower than the 2005–2006 rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ho PC, Tolentino FI (1984) Bacterial endophthalmitis after closed vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 102:207–210
Bacon AS, Davison CR, Patel BC, Frazer DG, Ficker LA, Dart JK (1993) Infective endophthalmitis following vitreoretinal surgery. Eye 7:529–534
Aaberg TM Jr, Flynn HW Jr, Schiffman J, Newton J (1998) Nosocomial acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis survey. A 10-year review of incidence and outcomes. Ophthalmology 105:1004–1010
Zhang S, Ding X, Hu J, Gao R (2003) Clinical features of endophthalmitis after vitreoretinal surgery. Eye Science 19:39–43
Eifrig CW, Flynn HW Jr, Scott IU, Newton J (2002) Acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis: review of incidence and visual outcomes (1995-2001). Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 33:373–378, erratum in Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2003;34:80
Eifrig CW, Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Smiddy J, Newton J (2004) Endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy: incidence, causative organisms, and visual acuity outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 138:799–802
Sakamoto T, Enaida H, Kubota T, Nakahara M, Yamakiri K, Yamashita T, Yokoyama M, Hata Y, Murata T, Miyata K (2004) Incidence of acute endophthalmitis after triamcinolone-assisted pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 138:137–138
Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Dev S, Shaikh S, Mittra RA, Arevalo JF, Kychenthal A, Acar N (2008) Endophthalmitis after 25-gauge and 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Retina 28:138–142
Kunimoto DY, Kaiser RS (2007) Wills Eye Retina Service. Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20- and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 114:2133–2137
Shimada H, Nakashizuka H, Hattori T, Mori R, Mizutani Y, Yuzawa M (2008) Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20- and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 115:2215–2220
Parolini B, Romanelli F, Prigione G, Pertile G (2009) Incidence of endophthalmitis in a large series of 23-gauge and 20-gauge transconjunctival pars plana vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247:895–898
Hirji KF, Mehta CR, Patel NR (1987) Computer distributions for exact logistic regression. JASA 82:1110–1117
Shaikh S, Ho S, Richmond PP, Olson JC, Barnes CD (2007) Untoward outcomes in 25-gauge versus 20-gauge vitreoretinal surgery. Retina 27:1048–1053
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, I.U., Flynn, H.W., Acar, N. et al. Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20-gauge vs 23-gauge vs 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249, 377–380 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1505-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1505-8