Skip to main content
Log in

Are cefuroxime and vancomycin really safe on the corneal endothelial cells?

  • Cornea
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the biochemical changes of the oxidant/antioxidant balance in corneal tissue, and determine the relative corneal endothelial toxicities of the following intracameral antibiotic agents: cefuroxime and vancomycin.

Methods

The experiment was conducted using New Zealand rabbits. The rabbits were randomly divided into three experimental groups as follows: cefuroxime group (n = 10), vancomycin group (n = 10), and control group (n = 10). Only the right eyes of the rabbits were used in this study. Twenty eyes received injections of 0.1 ml of one of the two antibiotic preparations, and ten control eyes received injections of 0.1 ml of balanced salt solution. Corneal thickness and clarity were measured before, and 3 and 6 h after surgery. The corneal tissues of the rabbits were extracted and homogenized in 2 ml of physiological saline, and kept at −80ºC. In the corneal tissue, malondialdehyde (MDA) and total thiol (SH) levels were measured with spectrophotometric methods. Friedman and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Neither cefuroxime nor vancomycin caused corneal thickening and edema at 3 and 6 h after injection, and no anterior chamber reaction was observed in both groups at both measurement times. The level of SH significantly decreased, while the level of MDA significantly increased in the corneal tissue in the cefuroxime group (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). In contrast, no statistically significant change in oxidative-stress parameters was observed in the vancomycin group (p = 0.165 and p = 0.876 respectively).

Conclusions

Corneal endothelial cells are very sensitive to any form of toxic exposure. Using intracameral cefuroxime during the anterior segment surgery may be more toxic on the endothelial tissue in patients with vulnerable corneal endothelium. Because of the definite risk of dosage errors, these agents should be prepared in the hospital pharmacy and not in the operating theatre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murphy CC, Nicholson S, Quah SA, Batterbury M, Neal T, Kaye SB (2007) Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin following intracameral bolus injection in patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 91(10):1350–1353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barry P, Seal DV, Gettinby G, Lees F, Peterson M, Revie CW (2006) ESCRS Endophthalmitis Study Group. Barry P, Seal DV, Gettinby G, Lees F, Peterson M, Revie CW; ESCRS Endophthalmitis Study Group. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(3):407–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arbisser LB (2008) Safety of intracameral moxifloxacin for prophylaxis of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(7):1114–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group (1995) Results of the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. A randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 113(12):1479–1496

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pflugfelder SC, Hernandez E, Fliesler SJ, Alvarez J, Pflugfelder ME, Forster RK (1987) Intravitreal vancomycin. Retinal toxicity, clearance, and interaction with gentamicin. Arch Ophthalmol 105(6):831–837

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wejde G, Montan P, Lundstrom M, Stenevi U, Thorburn W (2005) Endophthalmitis following cataract surgery in Sweden: national prospective survey 1999–2001. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83(1):7–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wasowicz W, Neve J, Peretz A (1993) Optimized steps in fluorometric determination of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances in serum: importance of extraction pH and influence of sample preservation and storage. Clin Chem 39(12):2522–2526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sedlak J, Lindsay RH (1968) Estimation of total, protein bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent. Anal Biochem 25(1):192–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yılmaz FM, Çelebi N, Yücel D (2004) Automated turbidimetric benzalkonium chloride method for measurement of protein in urine and cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chem 50(8):1450–1452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conover WJ (ed) (1980) Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 229–239

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siegel S, Castellan NJ, eds. (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York: 174–183

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kowalski RP, Romanowski EG, Mah FS, Yates KA, Gordon YJ (2005) Intracameral Vigamox (moxifloxacin 0.5%) is non-toxic and effective in preventing endophthalmitis in a rabbit model. Am J Ophthalmol 140(3):497–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kataria S (2004) Corneal endothelial safety & toxicity with intraocular surgical agents. J Bombay Ophthalmologists’ Association 13(2):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yoeruek E, Spitzer MS, Saygili O, Tatar O, Biedermann T, Yoeruek E, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Szurman P (2008) Comparison of in vitro safety profiles of vancomycin and cefuroxime on human corneal endothelial cells for intracameral use. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(12):2139–2145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Montan PG, Wejde G, Setterguist H, Rylander M, Zetterström C (2002) Prophylactic intracameral cefuroxime. Evaluation of safety and kinetics in cataract surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 28(6):982–987

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mamalis N, Edelhauser HF, Dawson DG, Chew J, LeBoyer RM, Werner L (2006) Toxic anterior segment syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 32(2):324–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang DF, Braga-Mele R, Mamalis N (2007) Prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: results of the 2007 ASCRS member survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(10):1801–1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mamalis N (2008) Intracameral medication: Is it worth the risk? J Cataract Refract Surg 34(3):339–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kramann C, Pitz S, Schwenn O, Haber M, Hommel G, Pfeiffer N (2001) Effects of intraocular cefotaxime on the human corneal endothelium. J Cataract Refract Surg 27(2):250–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Villada JR, Vicente U, Javaloy J, Alio JL (2005) Severe anaphylactic reaction after intracameral antibiotic administration during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 31(3):620–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferro JF, de-Pablos M, Lograno MJ, Guisasola L, Aizpuru F (1997) Postoperative contamination after using vancomycin and gentamicin during phacoemulsification. Arch Ophthalmol 115(2):165–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Esterbauer H, Schaur RJ, Zollner H (1991) Chemistry and biochemistry of 4 hydroxynonenal, malondialdehyde and related aldehydes. Free Radic Biol Med 11(1):81–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gutteridge JM, Hallliwell B (1990) The measurement and mechanism of lipid peroxidation in biological systems. Trends Biochem Sci 15(4):129–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kadota K, Yui Y, Hattori R, Murohara Y, Kawai C (1991) Decreased sulfhydryl groups of serum albumin in coronary artery disease. Jpn Circ J 55(10):937–941

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ganea E, Harding JJ (2006) Glutathione-related enzymes and the eye. Current Eye Research 31(1):1–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rao NA, Romero JL, Fernandez MA, Sevanian A, Marak GE (1987) Role of free radicals in uveitis. Surv Ophthalmol 32(3):209–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buddi R, Lin B, Atilano SR, Zorapapel NC, Kenney MC, Brown DJ (2002) Evidence of oxidative stres in human corneal diseases. J Histochem Cytochem 50(3):341–351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by Turkish Ophthalmology Society, Ankara Branch.

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demir M. Necati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özlem, T.Y., Necati, D.M., Fatma, Y.M. et al. Are cefuroxime and vancomycin really safe on the corneal endothelial cells?. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248, 415–420 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1267-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1267-3

Keywords

Navigation