Abstract
The Taser® eXtended Range Electronic Projectile (XREP®) is a wireless conducted electrical weapon (CEW) designed to incapacitate a person from a larger distance. The aim of this study was to analyze the ballistic injury potential of the XREP. Twenty rounds were fired from the Taser®X12 TM shotgun into ballistic soap covered with artificial skin and clothing at different shooting distances (1–25 m). One shot was fired at pig skin at a shooting distance of 10 m. The average projectile velocity was 67.0 m/s. The kinetic energy levels on impact varied from 28–52 J. Depending on the intermediate target, the projectiles penetrated up to 4.2 cm into the ballistic soap. On impact the nose assembly did not separate from the chassis, and no electrical activation was registered. Upon impact, a skin penetration of the XREP cannot be excluded. However, it is very unlikely at shooting distances of 10 m or more. Clothing and a high elasticity limit of the target body area can significantly reduce the penetration risk on impact.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kroll MW (2009) Physiology and pathology of Taser® electronic devices. J Forensic Leg Med 16:173–177
Cahalan K.: Mossberg and Taser join forces to launch the X12 dedicated less-lethal shotgun. Press Release 2008; available at: http://www.mossberg.com/press/pdf/41.pdf
TASER XREP Product Information Sheet; available at: http://www.apbweb.com/images/XREP.pdf
Sellier K, Kneubuehl BP. Wundballistik und ihre ballistischen Grundlagen. 2. völlig überarbeitete und ergänzte Auflage. Springer, Berlin 2001. 237.
Osirix DICOM – Viewer Version 3.8.1. 2010; available at http://www.osirix-viewer.com
Kneubuehl BP. k-analyzer. 2002; available at http://www.kneubuehl.com/k-analyzer.html
Jauchem JR, Cook MC, Beason C (2008) W. Blood factors of Sus scrofa following a series of three Taser® electronic control device exposures. Forensic Sci Int 175:166–70
Jauchem JR, Seaman RL, Fines DA (2011) Survival of anesthetized Sus scrofa after cycling (7 s on/3 s off) exposures to a Taser® X26 electronic control device for three minutes. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 32(2):124–130
Jauchem JR (2010) An animal model to investigate effectiveness and safety of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices). J Forensic Sci 55:521–6
Dennis AJ, Valentino DJ, Walter RJ et al (2007) Acute effects of TASER X26 discharges in a swine model. J Trauma 63:581–90
Dawes DM, Ho JD, Reardon RF, Strote SR, Nelson RS, Lundin EJ et al (2011) The respiratory, metabolic, and neuroendocrine effects of a new generation electronic control device. Forensic Sci Int 207:55–60
Kroll M, Ho J (2009) Taser® conducted electrical weapons: physiology, pathology, and law. Springer, New York
Haileyesus T, Annest JL, Mercy JA (2011) Non-fatal conductive energy device-related injuries treated in US emergency departments. 2005–2008. Inj Prev 17(2):127–30
Pasquier M, Carron PN, Vallotton L, Yersin B (2011) Electronic control device exposure: a review of morbidity and mortality. Ann Emerg Med 58(2):178–88, Epub 2011 May 5
Dawes DM, Ho J, Johnson M, Miner J, Lundin E. Breathing parameters, venous gases, and serum chemistries with exposure to a new wireless projectile conducted electrical weapon. Fourth Mediterranean Emergency Medicine Congress (MEMC IV), USA. 2007.
Ho J, Dawes D, Miner J. Serum biomarker effect of prolonged TASER XREP device exposure. EuSEM, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, 2008.
Dawes D, Ho J, Olsen J, Miner J. The effect of the extended range electronic projectile (XREP) on breathing. Australian College of Emergency Medicine winter symposium. Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, 2008.
Ho J, Dawes D, Reardon R, Lapine A, Miner J. Echocardiographic determination of cardiac rhythm during trans-thoracic wireless conducted electrical weapon exposure. Australian College of Emergency Medicine winter symposium. Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, 2008.
Di Maio VJM, Copeland AR, Besant-Matthews PE, Fletcher LA, Jones A (1982) Minimal velocities necessary for perforation of skin by air gun pellets and bullets. J Forensic Sci 27:894–898
Mattoo BN, Wani AK, Asgekar MD (1974) Casualty criteria for wounds from firearms with special reference to shot penetration. II J Forensic Sci 19(3):585–9
Bir CA, Steward SJ, Wilhelm M (2005) Skin penetration assessment of less lethal kinetic energy munitions. J Forensic Sci 50(6):1426–29
Kneubuehl BP (2004) Geschosse Band 2: Ballistik, Wirksamkeit, Messtechnik, 1st edn. Verlag Stocker Schmid, Dietikon
Chen SL, Richard CK, Murthy RC, Lauer AK (2006) Perforating ocular injury by Taser. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34(4):378–80
Viano DC, King AI (2008) Biomechanics of chest and abdomen impact. In: Peterson DR, Bronzino JD (eds) Biomechanics: principles and applications. CRC, Boca Raton
Carroll AW, Soderstrom CA (1978) A new nonpenetrating ballistic injury. Ann Surg 188(6):753–7
Cooper GJ, Taylor DE (1989) Biophysics of impact injury to the chest and abdomen. J Army Med Corps 135(2):58–67
Moseley RV, Vernick JJ (1970) Doty DB; Response to blunt chest injury: a new experimental model. J Trauma 10(8):673–83
Drobin D, Gryth D, Persson JK, Rocksén D, Arborelius UP, Olsson LG et al (2007) Electroencephalogram, circulation, and lung function after high-velocity behind armor blunt trauma. J Trauma 63:405–13
Gryth D, Rocksén D, Persson JK, Arborelius UP, Drobin D, Bursell J et al (2007) Severe lung contusion and death after high-velocity behind-armor blunt trauma: relation to protection level. Mil Med 172(10):1110–6
Link MS, Wang PJ, Pandian NG et al (1998) An experimental model of sudden death due to low-energy chest wall impact (commotio cordis). N Engl J Med 338:1805–11
Cannon L (2001) Behind armour blunt trauma—an emerging problem. J R Army Med Corps 147(1):87–96
Deady B, Innes G (1999) Sudden death of a young hockey player: case report of commotio cordis. J Emerg Med 17(3):459–62
Jansen LH, Rottier PB (1958) Some mechanical properties of human abdominal skin measured on excised strips. Dermatologica 117:65–83
Ankersen J, Birkbeck AE, Thomson RD, Vanezis P (1999) Puncture resistance and tensile strength of skin simulants. J of Engineering in Med 213:493–501
Conflicts of interest
This paper is a result of experiments which were performed under the supervision of the state police. The research was not funded financially, and there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kunz, S.N., Adamec, J., Zinka, B. et al. Wound ballistic evaluation of the TASER® XREP ammunition. Int J Legal Med 127, 119–126 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0628-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0628-8