Abstract
The role of bronchoscopic brushing for tumor detection and molecular testing in central lung cancer is unclear. In this study, 50 consecutive subjects with suspected central lung cancer underwent bronchoscopic brushing (31 males, median age 70, 5 never smokers). Histological results were: NSCLC/SCLC/low-grade-NET/granulation tissue in 36/8/2/4 cases. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was feasible in 62% of tumor-positive brush smear samples. In 78% of these cases, NGS displayed identical results compared to histology samples, in 22% NGS from brush smears detected specific mutations, whereas DNA quality from forceps biopsy was insufficient for NGS analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of brush smear analysis were 66% (95% confidence interval 50–79), 100% (40–100), 100% (85–100), and 21% (7–46). For the combined analysis of brush smear, brush tip washing and sheath tube content sensitivity was slightly elevated at 69% (53–81). In central lung cancer, bronchoscopic brushing detects tumor cells in about two-third of cases and allows a decision for or against targeted therapy in the majority of tumor-positive cases on the basis of NGS analysis.
Abbreviations
- ALK:
-
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase
- c.:
-
Coding deoxyribonucleotide acid sequence (mutation at nucleotide level)
- DDR2:
-
Discoidin domain receptor 2
- EBUS-TBNA:
-
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration
- KRAS:
-
Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog
- MET:
-
Mesenchymal-epidermal transition proto-oncogene
- NET:
-
Neuroendocrine tumor
- NGS:
-
Next generation sequencing
- NRAS:
-
Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog
- NSCLC:
-
Non-small cell lung cancer
- NPV:
-
Negative predictive value
- p.:
-
Protein (change at amino acid level)
- PIK3CA:
-
Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha
- PPV:
-
Positive predictive value
- PTEN:
-
Phosphatase and tensin homolog
- RET:
-
Rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene
- ROS1:
-
ROS1 proto-oncogene
- SCLC:
-
Small cell lung cancer
- TP53:
-
Tumor protein 53
- TTF1:
-
Thyroid transcription factor 1
References
Chechani V (1996) Bronchoscopic diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules and lung masses in the absence of endobronchial abnormality. Chest 109(3):620–625
Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM (2013) Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143(5 Suppl):e142S–e165S
Novello S, Barlesi F, Califano R, Cufer T, Ekman S, Levra MG, Kerr K, Popat S, Reck M, Senan S, Simo GV, Vansteenkiste J, Peters S, Committee EG (2016) Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27(suppl 5):v1–v27
Lynch JA, Berse B, Rabb M, Mosquin P, Chew R, West SL, Coomer N, Becker D, Kautter J (2018) Underutilization and disparities in access to EGFR testing among medicare patients with lung cancer from 2010 to 2013. BMC Cancer 18(1):306
Peifer M, Fernandez-Cuesta L, Sos ML, George J, Seidel D, Kasper LH, Plenker D, Leenders F, Sun R, Zander T, Menon R, Koker M, Dahmen I, Muller C, Di Cerbo V, Schildhaus HU, Altmuller J, Baessmann I, Becker C, de Wilde B, Vandesompele J, Bohm D, Ansen S, Gabler F, Wilkening I, Heynck S, Heuckmann JM, Lu X, Carter SL, Cibulskis K, Banerji S, Getz G, Park KS, Rauh D, Grutter C, Fischer M, Pasqualucci L, Wright G, Wainer Z, Russell P, Petersen I, Chen Y, Stoelben E, Ludwig C, Schnabel P, Hoffmann H, Muley T, Brockmann M, Engel-Riedel W, Muscarella LA, Fazio VM, Groen H, Timens W, Sietsma H, Thunnissen E, Smit E, Heideman DA, Snijders PJ, Cappuzzo F, Ligorio C, Damiani S, Field J, Solberg S, Brustugun OT, Lund-Iversen M, Sanger J, Clement JH, Soltermann A, Moch H, Weder W, Solomon B, Soria JC, Validire P, Besse B, Brambilla E, Brambilla C, Lantuejoul S, Lorimier P, Schneider PM, Hallek M, Pao W, Meyerson M, Sage J, Shendure J, Schneider R, Buttner R, Wolf J, Nurnberg P, Perner S, Heukamp LC, Brindle PK, Haas S, Thomas RK (2012) Integrative genome analyses identify key somatic driver mutations of small-cell lung cancer. Nat Genet 44(10):1104–1110
Ogino S, Gulley ML, den Dunnen JT, Wilson RB, Association for Molecular Pathology Training and Education Committee (2007) Standard mutation nomenclature in molecular diagnostics: practical and educational challenges. J Mol Diagn 9(1):1–6
Layfield LJ, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Baloch Z, Ehya H, Geisinger K, Hsiao SJ, Lin O, Lindeman NI, Roh M, Schmitt F, Sidiropoulos N, VanderLaan PA (2016) Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of respiratory lesions: the papanicolaou society of cytopathology consensus recommendations for respiratory cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 44(12):1000–1009
Bonney A, Beaty A, See K, Irving L, Steinfort D (2016) Diagnostic utility of bronchial brush-tip washings for the immunohistochemical assessment of peripheral lung lesions. Acta Cytol 60(1):74–78
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Lars Hagmeyer, Jana Fassunke, Marianne Engels, Marcel Treml, Simon Herkenrath, Sandhya Matthes, Reinhard Büttner, Winfried Randerath states that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagmeyer, L., Fassunke, J., Engels, M. et al. Bronchoscopic Brushing from Central Lung Cancer—Next Generation Sequencing Results are Reliable. Lung 197, 333–337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00213-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00213-8