Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bronchoscopic Brushing from Central Lung Cancer—Next Generation Sequencing Results are Reliable

  • LUNG CANCER
  • Published:
Lung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of bronchoscopic brushing for tumor detection and molecular testing in central lung cancer is unclear. In this study, 50 consecutive subjects with suspected central lung cancer underwent bronchoscopic brushing (31 males, median age 70, 5 never smokers). Histological results were: NSCLC/SCLC/low-grade-NET/granulation tissue in 36/8/2/4 cases. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was feasible in 62% of tumor-positive brush smear samples. In 78% of these cases, NGS displayed identical results compared to histology samples, in 22% NGS from brush smears detected specific mutations, whereas DNA quality from forceps biopsy was insufficient for NGS analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of brush smear analysis were 66% (95% confidence interval 50–79), 100% (40–100), 100% (85–100), and 21% (7–46). For the combined analysis of brush smear, brush tip washing and sheath tube content sensitivity was slightly elevated at 69% (53–81). In central lung cancer, bronchoscopic brushing detects tumor cells in about two-third of cases and allows a decision for or against targeted therapy in the majority of tumor-positive cases on the basis of NGS analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

ALK:

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase

c.:

Coding deoxyribonucleotide acid sequence (mutation at nucleotide level)

DDR2:

Discoidin domain receptor 2

EBUS-TBNA:

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

KRAS:

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog

MET:

Mesenchymal-epidermal transition proto-oncogene

NET:

Neuroendocrine tumor

NGS:

Next generation sequencing

NRAS:

Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

NPV:

Negative predictive value

p.:

Protein (change at amino acid level)

PIK3CA:

Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit alpha

PPV:

Positive predictive value

PTEN:

Phosphatase and tensin homolog

RET:

Rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene

ROS1:

ROS1 proto-oncogene

SCLC:

Small cell lung cancer

TP53:

Tumor protein 53

TTF1:

Thyroid transcription factor 1

References

  1. Chechani V (1996) Bronchoscopic diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules and lung masses in the absence of endobronchial abnormality. Chest 109(3):620–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM (2013) Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143(5 Suppl):e142S–e165S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Novello S, Barlesi F, Califano R, Cufer T, Ekman S, Levra MG, Kerr K, Popat S, Reck M, Senan S, Simo GV, Vansteenkiste J, Peters S, Committee EG (2016) Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27(suppl 5):v1–v27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lynch JA, Berse B, Rabb M, Mosquin P, Chew R, West SL, Coomer N, Becker D, Kautter J (2018) Underutilization and disparities in access to EGFR testing among medicare patients with lung cancer from 2010 to 2013. BMC Cancer 18(1):306

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Peifer M, Fernandez-Cuesta L, Sos ML, George J, Seidel D, Kasper LH, Plenker D, Leenders F, Sun R, Zander T, Menon R, Koker M, Dahmen I, Muller C, Di Cerbo V, Schildhaus HU, Altmuller J, Baessmann I, Becker C, de Wilde B, Vandesompele J, Bohm D, Ansen S, Gabler F, Wilkening I, Heynck S, Heuckmann JM, Lu X, Carter SL, Cibulskis K, Banerji S, Getz G, Park KS, Rauh D, Grutter C, Fischer M, Pasqualucci L, Wright G, Wainer Z, Russell P, Petersen I, Chen Y, Stoelben E, Ludwig C, Schnabel P, Hoffmann H, Muley T, Brockmann M, Engel-Riedel W, Muscarella LA, Fazio VM, Groen H, Timens W, Sietsma H, Thunnissen E, Smit E, Heideman DA, Snijders PJ, Cappuzzo F, Ligorio C, Damiani S, Field J, Solberg S, Brustugun OT, Lund-Iversen M, Sanger J, Clement JH, Soltermann A, Moch H, Weder W, Solomon B, Soria JC, Validire P, Besse B, Brambilla E, Brambilla C, Lantuejoul S, Lorimier P, Schneider PM, Hallek M, Pao W, Meyerson M, Sage J, Shendure J, Schneider R, Buttner R, Wolf J, Nurnberg P, Perner S, Heukamp LC, Brindle PK, Haas S, Thomas RK (2012) Integrative genome analyses identify key somatic driver mutations of small-cell lung cancer. Nat Genet 44(10):1104–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogino S, Gulley ML, den Dunnen JT, Wilson RB, Association for Molecular Pathology Training and Education Committee (2007) Standard mutation nomenclature in molecular diagnostics: practical and educational challenges. J Mol Diagn 9(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Layfield LJ, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Baloch Z, Ehya H, Geisinger K, Hsiao SJ, Lin O, Lindeman NI, Roh M, Schmitt F, Sidiropoulos N, VanderLaan PA (2016) Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of respiratory lesions: the papanicolaou society of cytopathology consensus recommendations for respiratory cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 44(12):1000–1009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonney A, Beaty A, See K, Irving L, Steinfort D (2016) Diagnostic utility of bronchial brush-tip washings for the immunohistochemical assessment of peripheral lung lesions. Acta Cytol 60(1):74–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Hagmeyer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Lars Hagmeyer, Jana Fassunke, Marianne Engels, Marcel Treml, Simon Herkenrath, Sandhya Matthes, Reinhard Büttner, Winfried Randerath states that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hagmeyer, L., Fassunke, J., Engels, M. et al. Bronchoscopic Brushing from Central Lung Cancer—Next Generation Sequencing Results are Reliable. Lung 197, 333–337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00213-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-019-00213-8

Keywords

Navigation