Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical characteristics and comparative study of different modalities of treatment of pseudocyst pinna

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of the article were to study the clinical characteristic of patients with pseudocysts and to compare different common modalities of treatment and introduce the concept of observation in pseudocyst management. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with pseudocyst of the auricle between June 2009 and June 2011 in a medical college hospital. The patients were divided into four groups each of seven patients on the basis of primary treatment offered. Four primary treatments offered were simple aspiration, aspiration with intralesional steroid, incision and drainage with removal of anterior cartilage leaflet with buttoning, and lastly, simple observation and reassurance. All 28 patients were male with involvement of right side more than left and no one had bilateral involvement. Adults in the age group of 30–40 were commonly affected. Most of the patients had history of significant trauma by security forces. Most common site of involvement was scaphoid and triangular fossa. The best form of treatment with minimum recurrence was incision and drainage with removal of anterior cartilage leaflet with buttoning. Simple observation as a treatment option was found to be as good as intralesional steroids. Pseudocyst of the pinna is a benign condition of unknown etiology affecting the pinna, commonly encountered in middle-aged men. It is a rare condition and is hardly encountered in routine ENT practice. Bilateral diseases are uncommon. Most common site of occurrence is triangular and scaphoid fossa. Many modalities of treatment have been recommended in literature with varied recurrence and failure rates. The best treatment is surgical deroofing followed by buttoning with minimum recurrences. An option of simple observation for 2–3 months should be discussed with each patient and was found to be as good as intralesional steroids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramadass T, Ayyaswamy G (2006) Pseudocyst of auricle etiopathogenesis, treatment update and literature review. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 58(2):156–159

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hartmann A (1846) Uber Cystenbildung in der Ohrenmuschel. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd 15:156–166

    Google Scholar 

  3. Engel D (1966) Pseudocyst of the auricle in Chinese. Arch Otolaryngol 83:197–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen JE (1967) Pseudocyst of the auricle in Caucasians. Arch Otolaryngol 85:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Supiyaphun P, Decha W (2001) Auricular pseudocysts: a treatment with the Chulalongkorn University vacuum device. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:213–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi S, Lam K, Chan KW, Cohadially FN, Anthony SM (1984) Endochondral pseudocyst of the auricle in Chinese. Arch Otolaryngol 110:792–796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karabulut H, Acar B, Selçuk K (2009) Treatment of the non-traumatic auricula pseudocyst with aspiration and intralesional steroid injection. New J Med 26:117–119

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee YK, Ku BS, Kim YH (2007) A case of pseudocyst of the auricle treated by incisional biopsy. Korean J Dermatol 45(5):518–520

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kanotra SP, Lateef M (2009) Pseudocyst of pinna: a recurrence-free approach. Am J Otolaryngol 30(2):73–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hegde R, Bhargava S, Bhargava KB (1996) _Pseudocyst of the auricle: a new method of treatment. J Laryngol Otol 110:767–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramalingam R, Ramalingam KK (1998) Pseudocyst of the auricle—a new method of treatment. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 50(2):172–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sangeetha RH, Vijayendra H (2004) A safe and reliable technique in the management of pseudocysts. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 56(I):29–30

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oyama N, Satoh M, Iwatsuki K, Kaneko F (2001) Treatment of recurrent auricle pseudocyst with intralesional injection of minocycline: a report of two cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 45(4):554–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim CM, Goh YH, Chao SS, Lim Lynne (2002) Psuedocyst of the auricle. Laryngoscope 12:2033–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Salgado CJ, Hardy JE, Mardni S, Dockery JM, Matthews MS (2006) Treatment of auricular pseudocyst with aspiration and local pressure. J Plastic Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:1450–1452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuncer S, Basterzi Y, Yavuzer R (2003) Recurrent auricular pseudocyst: anew treatment recommendation with curettage and fibrin glue. Dermatol Surg 29:1080–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan BY (2004) Auricular pseudocyst in the tropics: a multi-racial Singapore experience. J Laryngol Otol 118(3):185–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen PR, Grossman ME (1990) Pseudocyst of the auricle: case report and world literature review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:1202–1204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shanmugham MS (1985) Pseudocyst of the auricle. J Laryngol Otol 99:701–703

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Devlin J, Harrison CJ, Whitby DJ et al (1990) Cartilaginous pseudocyst of the external auricle in children with atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol 112:699–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhandary S, Mannil TV (2000) A comparative study in the management of auricular pseudocysts. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 52(3):246–250

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vishwakarma SC, Gupta D, Verma SK (1987) Pseudocyst of the auricle. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 39(4):170

    Google Scholar 

  23. Okuma M (1985) Treatment for pseudocyst of the auricle. Jpn Dermatol 95:390 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miyamoto H, Oida M, Onuma S, Uchiyama M (1994) Steroid injection therapy for pseudocyst of the auricle. Acta Derm Venereol 74:140–142

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harder MK, Zachary CB (1993) Pseudocyst of the ear. Surgical treatment. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 19(6):585–588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang CH, Kuo WR, Lin CH, Wang LF, Ho KY, Tsai KB (2004) Deroofing surgical treatment for pseudocyst of the auricle. J Otolaryngol 33(3):177–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffmann TJ, Richardson TF, Jacobs RJ, Torres (1993) A pseudocyst of the auricle. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 19(3):259–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohammed E, Jakubikova J (2007) Bilateral pseudocyst of pinna: a case report. Bratisl Lek Listy 108(10–11):470–473

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We have no financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research and in fact no organization sponsored our research and it was self-funded. We have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suhail Amin Patigaroo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patigaroo, S.A., Mehfooz, N., Patigaroo, F.A. et al. Clinical characteristics and comparative study of different modalities of treatment of pseudocyst pinna. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269, 1747–1754 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1805-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1805-6

Keywords

Navigation