Abstract
Purpose
We investigated the role of physical examination, CT scan, chest X-ray, and Pap smear in the routine follow-up program for cervical cancer patients previously treated with radiotherapy.
Methods
The records of women who had developed recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The optimal procedure for the detection of recurrence was evaluated according to the disease-free interval (DFI). Survival analysis was performed based on the Kaplan–Meier method and comparisons between groups were made using the log-rank test.
Results
A total of 146 recurrent cervical cancer patients were included in our database. The majority of recurrences were diagnosed either by symptoms, physical examination, or CT scan. The patients whose recurrent disease was detected by Pap smear, physical examination, or CT scan had a significantly longer survival than those detected by symptoms. When analyzed according to DFI, physical examination, and CT scan led to the detection of recurrence in patients with a DFI of 1–5 years. In contrast, chest X-ray and Pap smear only had a clinical impact on the diagnosis of recurrence in patients with a DFI of 1–2 years.
Conclusions
Chest X-ray and Pap smear can be routinely performed for the first 2 years after radiotherapy, but can be omitted or used sparingly thereafter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- ISBT:
-
Interstitial brachytherapy
- OS:
-
Overall survival
- DFI:
-
Disease-free interval
- SCLN:
-
Supraclavicular lymph node
- EBRT:
-
External beam radiotherapy
- RT:
-
Radiation therapy
- CCRT:
-
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
References
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300
Ajiki W, Tsukuma H, Oshima A (2004) Research Group for Population-based Cancer Registration in Japan. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 1999: estimates based on data from 11 population-based cancer registries. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:352–356
Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P et al (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 350:535–540
Long HJ (2007) Management of metastatic cervical cancer: review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 25:2966–2974
Kew FM, Roberts AP, Cruickshank DJ (2005) The role of routine follow-up after gynecological malignancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:413–419
Mabuchi S, Morishige K, Isohashi F, Yoshioka Y, Takeda T, Yamamoto T et al (2009) Postoperative concurrent nedaplatin-based chemoradiotherapy improves survival in early-stage cervical cancer patients with adverse risk factors. Gynecol Oncol 115:482–487
Mabuchi S, Ugaki H, Isohashi F, Yoshioka Y, Temma K, Yada-Hashimoto N et al (2010) Concurrent weekly nedaplatin, external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with FIGO stage IIIb cervical cancer: a comparison with a cohort treated by radiotherapy alone. Gynecol Obstet Invest 69:224–232
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Cervical Cancer—v.1.2006. http://www.nccn.com/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf
Bodurka-Bevers D, Morris M, Eifel PJ, Levenback C, Bevers MW, Lucas KR et al (2000) Posttherapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: an outcomes analysis. Gynecol Oncol 78:187–193
Samlal RA, Van Der Velden J, Van Eerden T, Schilthuis MS, Gonzalez Gonzalez D, Lammes FB (1998) Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy: an analysis of clinical aspects and prognosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 8:78–84
Zola P, Fuso L, Mazzola S, Piovano E, Perotto S, Gadducci A et al (2007) Could follow-up different modalities play a role in asymptomatic cervical cancer relapses diagnosis? An Italian multicenter retrospective analysis. Gynecol Oncol 107:S150–S154
Krebs HB, Helmkamp BF, Sevin BU, Poliakoff SR, Nadji M, Averette HE (1982) Recurrent cancer of the cervix following radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection. Obstet Gynecol 59:422–427
Duyn A, Van Eijkeren M, Kenter G, Zwinderman K, Ansink A (2002) Recurrent cervical cancer: detection and prognosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:351–355
Lim KC, Howells RE, Evans AS (2004) The role of clinical follow up in early stage cervical cancer in South Wales. BJOG 111:1444–1448
Morice P, Deyrolle C, Rey A, Atallah D, Pautier P, Camatte S, Thoury A et al (2004) Value of routine follow-up procedures for patients with stage I/II cervical cancer treated with combined surgery–radiation therapy. Ann Oncol 15:218–223
Sartori E, Pasinetti B, Carrara L, Gambino A, Odicino F, Pecorelli S (2007) Pattern of failure and value of follow-up procedures in endometrial and cervical cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 107:S241–S247
ACOG practice bulletin (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Obstet Gynecol 99(5 Pt 1):855–867
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology – Cervical Cancer (V.1.2008). http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf
Tangjitgamol S, Levenback CF, Beller U, Kavanagh JJ (2004) Role of surgical resection for lung, liver, and central nervous system metastases in patients with gynecological cancer: a literature review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 14:399–422
Markman M (2009) Optimal management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:S40–S43
Tewari KS, Monk BJ (2009) Recent achievements and future developments in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer: trials of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Semin Oncol 36:170–180
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the following colleagues who participated in this study: Kiyoshi Yoshino, Masami Fujita, and Tateki Tsutsui.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mabuchi, S., Isohashi, F., Maruoka, S. et al. Post-treatment follow-up procedures in cervical cancer patients previously treated with radiotherapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 179–185 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2235-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2235-4