Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Post-treatment follow-up procedures in cervical cancer patients previously treated with radiotherapy

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the role of physical examination, CT scan, chest X-ray, and Pap smear in the routine follow-up program for cervical cancer patients previously treated with radiotherapy.

Methods

The records of women who had developed recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The optimal procedure for the detection of recurrence was evaluated according to the disease-free interval (DFI). Survival analysis was performed based on the Kaplan–Meier method and comparisons between groups were made using the log-rank test.

Results

A total of 146 recurrent cervical cancer patients were included in our database. The majority of recurrences were diagnosed either by symptoms, physical examination, or CT scan. The patients whose recurrent disease was detected by Pap smear, physical examination, or CT scan had a significantly longer survival than those detected by symptoms. When analyzed according to DFI, physical examination, and CT scan led to the detection of recurrence in patients with a DFI of 1–5 years. In contrast, chest X-ray and Pap smear only had a clinical impact on the diagnosis of recurrence in patients with a DFI of 1–2 years.

Conclusions

Chest X-ray and Pap smear can be routinely performed for the first 2 years after radiotherapy, but can be omitted or used sparingly thereafter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

ISBT:

Interstitial brachytherapy

OS:

Overall survival

DFI:

Disease-free interval

SCLN:

Supraclavicular lymph node

EBRT:

External beam radiotherapy

RT:

Radiation therapy

CCRT:

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajiki W, Tsukuma H, Oshima A (2004) Research Group for Population-based Cancer Registration in Japan. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 1999: estimates based on data from 11 population-based cancer registries. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:352–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P et al (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 350:535–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Long HJ (2007) Management of metastatic cervical cancer: review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 25:2966–2974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kew FM, Roberts AP, Cruickshank DJ (2005) The role of routine follow-up after gynecological malignancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:413–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mabuchi S, Morishige K, Isohashi F, Yoshioka Y, Takeda T, Yamamoto T et al (2009) Postoperative concurrent nedaplatin-based chemoradiotherapy improves survival in early-stage cervical cancer patients with adverse risk factors. Gynecol Oncol 115:482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mabuchi S, Ugaki H, Isohashi F, Yoshioka Y, Temma K, Yada-Hashimoto N et al (2010) Concurrent weekly nedaplatin, external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with FIGO stage IIIb cervical cancer: a comparison with a cohort treated by radiotherapy alone. Gynecol Obstet Invest 69:224–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Cervical Cancer—v.1.2006. http://www.nccn.com/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf

  9. Bodurka-Bevers D, Morris M, Eifel PJ, Levenback C, Bevers MW, Lucas KR et al (2000) Posttherapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: an outcomes analysis. Gynecol Oncol 78:187–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Samlal RA, Van Der Velden J, Van Eerden T, Schilthuis MS, Gonzalez Gonzalez D, Lammes FB (1998) Recurrent cervical carcinoma after radical hysterectomy: an analysis of clinical aspects and prognosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 8:78–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zola P, Fuso L, Mazzola S, Piovano E, Perotto S, Gadducci A et al (2007) Could follow-up different modalities play a role in asymptomatic cervical cancer relapses diagnosis? An Italian multicenter retrospective analysis. Gynecol Oncol 107:S150–S154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krebs HB, Helmkamp BF, Sevin BU, Poliakoff SR, Nadji M, Averette HE (1982) Recurrent cancer of the cervix following radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection. Obstet Gynecol 59:422–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Duyn A, Van Eijkeren M, Kenter G, Zwinderman K, Ansink A (2002) Recurrent cervical cancer: detection and prognosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:351–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim KC, Howells RE, Evans AS (2004) The role of clinical follow up in early stage cervical cancer in South Wales. BJOG 111:1444–1448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morice P, Deyrolle C, Rey A, Atallah D, Pautier P, Camatte S, Thoury A et al (2004) Value of routine follow-up procedures for patients with stage I/II cervical cancer treated with combined surgery–radiation therapy. Ann Oncol 15:218–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sartori E, Pasinetti B, Carrara L, Gambino A, Odicino F, Pecorelli S (2007) Pattern of failure and value of follow-up procedures in endometrial and cervical cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 107:S241–S247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. ACOG practice bulletin (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Obstet Gynecol 99(5 Pt 1):855–867

    Google Scholar 

  18. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology – Cervical Cancer (V.1.2008). http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/cervical.pdf

  19. Tangjitgamol S, Levenback CF, Beller U, Kavanagh JJ (2004) Role of surgical resection for lung, liver, and central nervous system metastases in patients with gynecological cancer: a literature review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 14:399–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Markman M (2009) Optimal management of recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:S40–S43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tewari KS, Monk BJ (2009) Recent achievements and future developments in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer: trials of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Semin Oncol 36:170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the following colleagues who participated in this study: Kiyoshi Yoshino, Masami Fujita, and Tateki Tsutsui.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seiji Mabuchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mabuchi, S., Isohashi, F., Maruoka, S. et al. Post-treatment follow-up procedures in cervical cancer patients previously treated with radiotherapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 179–185 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2235-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2235-4

Keywords

Navigation