Abstract
Background
The rationale of this study was to identify independent prognostic factors influencing the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients defined according to the New Berlin Definition.
Methods
Retrospective data analysis on 173 consecutively polytraumatized patients treated at a level I trauma center between January 2012 and December 2015. Patients were classified into two groups: severely injured patients (ISS > 16) and polytraumatized patients (patients who met the diagnostic criteria for the New Berlin Definition).
Results
Polytraumatized patients showed significantly lower late-phase and overall survival rates. The presence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and age > 55 years had a significant influence on the late-phase survival in polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients. Despite the percentage of severe TBI being nearly identical in both groups, severe TBI was identified as main cause of death in polytraumatized patients. Furthermore, severe TBI remains the main cause of death in polytraumatized patients > 55 years of age, whereas younger polytraumatized patients (< 55 years of age) tend to die more often due to the acute trauma.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that age beyond 55 years and concomitant (severe) TBI remain as most important influencing risk factor for the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients.
Level of evidence
Prognostic study, level III.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Recent literature has detected prognostic factors regarding the survival of trauma patients and the outcome of polytraumatized patients. The main focus of this publications was on specific types of trauma [1,2,3,4,5,6] or specific types of injuries [7, 8]. The term “Polytrauma” has been frequently defined as patients with a high injury severity score (ISS) without regard to their pathophysiological conditions. An injury severity score (ISS) greater than 16 points has been described to result in a mortality risk above 10% [9] which determines an internationally accepted threshold for “polytrauma”. Without a clear definition of polytrauma it remains challenging to compare clinical characteristics, outcomes and potential prognostic factors on the survival of polytrauma patients [10]. When defining polytrauma both the anatomical as well as the physiological parameters should be included [11]. A well-known definition of polytrauma is the New Berlin Definition that adds at least one of five standardized physiological conditions to the definition of ISS ≥ 16 and at least two different affected body regions with an AIS ≥ 3 [12]. The New Berlin Definition has been shown to be feasible and applicable for polytrauma patients [12,13,14,15]. Rau et al. [13] showed that polytrauma patients identified according to the New Berlin Definition had significantly higher ISS scores and significantly higher mortality rates.
To our knowledge there is little data on possible prognostic factors influencing especially the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients classified according to the New Berlin Definition when compared to severely injured patients (ISS > 16 points).
Our study addresses this issue and compares patients who were identified as polytraumatized patients according to the criteria of the New Berlin Definition or defined either as severely injured patients with an ISS > 16 points without regard to their pathophysiological conditions:
-
Do patients defined as polytraumatized according to the New Berlin Definition show different clinical characteristics, trauma mechanisms or different injury characteristics?
-
Are there any potential prognostic factors especially for the late-phase survival of these polytraumatized patients?
Methods
Inclusion criteria
In this study 337 consecutive patients who were admitted to our hospital with critical injuries were enrolled retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2015. Patients with an ISS > 16 points and an AIS > 3 and at least 2 or more different body regions affected were included. Patients with isolated traumatic brain injuries (n = 101), patients with minor injuries (AIS < 3 or ISS < 17) (n = 45) and patients younger than 18 years of age (n = 18) were excluded, leading to 173 remaining patients.
The included 173 patients were divided into two groups:
-
severely injured patients with an ISS > 16 points as well as an AIS > 3 in one body region and at least 2 or more different body regions affected (n = 80) and
-
polytraumatized patients that were classified according to the New Berlin Definition (n = 93): AIS > 3 points for two or more different body regions with the addition of at least one of five standardized physiological conditions (hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg), unconsciousness (GCS score < 8), acidosis (BE < − 6.0), coagulopathy (aPTT > 40 s or INR > 1.4) or age (> 70 years).
Three time-dependent events for the analysis of mortality were defined: acute-phase death (death within the first 24 h or on arrival at the hospital), late-phase death (death after the first 24 h within the hospital stay) and overall-death [death of the disease (DOD)-defined as death at any time within the hospital stay]. Data analysis focused on potential prognostic factors regarding the late-phase survival. Possible prognostic factors such as severe TBI, age, injury severity and trauma mechanism were detected.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis focused on potential prognostic factors regarding the late-phase survival in severely injured patients (ISS > 16 points) compared to polytraumatized patients (determined according to the Berlin Definition). Continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges. Categorical variables are provided with percentages. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic variables and clinical characteristics. Trauma mechanisms, injury characteristics and severity of injuries (classified with the AIS score) were examined. For detection of associations between qualitative variables a chi-square test was performed. For comparison between categorical and continuous variables the Student t test was done. A two-sided p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to provide survival estimates, which were assessed with a log-rank test. For analysis of prognostic factors on the late-phase survival, patients who died of unrelated causes or within the acute-phase were considered to have been censored. All statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 26.0.
Results
Study population
One-hundred-and-seventy-three severely injured patients were enrolled consecutively from January 2012 to December 2015: 126 patients (72.8%) were male, 47 patients (27.2%) female with an average age at time of trauma of 45.12 years (range from 18 to 93 years). The baseline characteristics such as gender, age and clinical symptoms, the trauma mechanism as well as the short-term outcomes were reported (Table 1). No gender differences between the two groups were detected. The mean age in both groups was nearly identical: 46.54 years of age (± 20.34) in polytraumatized patients and 43.48 years of age (± 16.72) in severely injured patients (p = 0.286). Despite this, the percentage of geriatric patients (> 65 years of age) was significantly higher in polytraumatized patients (21.5% vs. 10.0%; p = 0.041).
Injury characteristics and injury severity
The main mechanism of injury was a motor vehicle accident followed by a fall from greater height (> 3 m) in both groups even though not statistically significant. In polytraumatized patients a suicidal attempt was documented more often (18.3% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.071). The presence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) was similar in both groups (66.7% vs. 61.3%; p = 0.459), whereas severe TBI (AIS ≥ 3) was seen more often in polytraumatized patients (60.2% vs. 47.5%; p = 0.094) without any statistical difference. Thoracic injuries and pelvic injuries were seen significantly more often in polytraumatized patients. No differences in the presence of abdominal injuries, injuries of the spine or injuries of extremities could be detected in both groups (Table 1).
Polytraumatized patients showed significantly higher ISS scores (35.29 vs. 27.54; p < 0.001). In these patients a resuscitation had to be performed more often (p = 0.013) and they showed significantly lower survival rates in the acute phase (p = 0.018) and the late phase (p = 0.002). Polytraumatized patients showed an overall mortality rate of 37.6% compared to severely injured patients who showed an overall mortality rate of 10% (p < 0.001; Fig. 1).
Late-phase survival
No influence of gender, suicidal attempt, thoracic, abdominal or pelvic injuries on the late-phase survival could be detected in both groups. The presence of TBI had a significant influence on the late-phase survival in polytraumatized patients (p = 0.014) but not in severely injured patients (p = 0.109). Regarding the presence of severe TBI a significant influence on the late-phase survival could be detected in both groups. The AUC for predicting late-phase mortality using the age on admission was 0.717 (p < 0.001). Based on these findings our results suggest an optimal age cut-off value of 55 years on admission to predict late-phase mortality. Kaplan–Meier curves were created for late-phase mortality based on age on admission. Results of the log-rank test (p = 0.001) showed that age > 55 years was a predictor of late-phase survival in polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients (p = 0.001).
Despite the percentage of severe TBI being nearly identical in both groups, severe TBI was identified as main cause of death in polytraumatized patients. Furthermore, severe TBI remains the main cause of death in polytraumatized patients > 55 years of age, whereas younger polytraumatized patients (< 55 years of age) tend to die more often due to the acute trauma (p = 0.002).
Limitation
This retrospective non-randomized, single-center analysis has the characteristic limitations of registry data and post hoc analyses. There are no data on functional outcome and quality of life parameters available. Furthermore, long-term mortality was not evaluated in this study. Due to the retrospective design of this study there might be an inherent selection bias. The strength of this study and sign of quality is the careful analysis of data in all consecutively included patients.
Discussion
Our study contributes new insights regarding prognostic factors in patients defined as “polytrauma” according to the New Berlin Definition. Although a decline in trauma related deaths can be seen over time, trauma remains one of the leading causes of death world-wide [16].
First, we found an increase in the mean age of our polytraumatized patients compared to previous studies [17], reflecting the rapidly aging population world-wide. As already well documented, mortality rates in trauma patients increase with age, even more in the sixth and seventh decade of life [18, 19]. Especially, elderly patients, mainly > 75 years of age show a peak in mortality which is seen around day 6 after the initial trauma [19]. The New Berlin Definition uses an age > 70 years as physiological condition for polytraumatized patients with an increased mortality rate [12,13,14,15]. This cut-off of > 70 years was chosen due to a higher mortality rate in this age group [12]. In our study population even younger polytraumatized patients with an age of > 55 showed significantly lower late-phase survival rates when compared to severely injured patients.
Secondly, the presence of TBI had a significant influence on the late-phase survival in polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients (although the incidence of TBI was nearly identical in both groups of our patients). These results suggest that concomitant TBI in polytraumatized patients leads to higher mortality rate reflecting once again the vulnerability of these patients. An increase in the incidence of TBI in elderly trauma patients mainly caused by road injuries and falls has been shown [20]. Recent studies suggest TBI as a strong predicting factor for the survival in trauma patients [21, 22]. Even more, concomitant injuries seem to have a significant effect on the mortality in patients with moderate TBI [23]. Severe TBI had a significant influence on the late-phase survival in both groups of our patients and was detected more often in polytraumatized patients. In accordance with the literature [4, 5, 24,25,26,27,28] severe TBI remains the most common cause of death in 61.9% of all late-phase deaths in our patients. Furthermore severe TBI iwas the main cause of death in polytraumatized patients > 55 years of age, whereas younger polytraumatized patients (< 55 years of age) tend to die more often due to the acute trauma.
Thirdly, our study confirms that the New Berlin Definition is feasible and applicable for polytrauma patients. When comparing mortality rates of polytraumatized and severely injured patients higher mortality rates in polytraumatized patients (37.6% vs. 10%) were observed in our study population.
Our results suggest a strong influence of severe TBI and an age > 55 years on the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients meeting the New Berlin Definition.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that even younger polytraumatized patients (> 55 years of age) as well as polytraumatized patients with concomitant TBI have a higher late-phase mortality compared to severely injured patients.
Availability of data and materials
The data used/analyzed is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Arroyo W, Nelson KJ, Belmont PJ Jr, Bader JO, Schoenfeld AJ (2013) Pelvic trauma: What are the predictors of mortality and cardiac, venous thrombo-embolic and infectious complications following injury? Injury 44(12):1745–1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.007
Battle C, Hutchings H, Lovett S, Bouamra O, Jones S, Sen A, Gagg J, Robinson D, Hartford-Beynon J, Williams J, Evans A (2014) Predicting outcomes after blunt chest wall trauma: development and external validation of a new prognostic model. Crit Care 18(3):R98. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13873
Battle CE, Evans PA (2015) Predictors of mortality in patients with flail chest: a systematic review. Emerg Med J 32(12):961–965. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2015-204939
Di Deo P, Lingsma H, Nieboer D, Roozenbeek B, Citerio G, Beretta L, Magnoni S, Zanier ER, Stocchetti N (2016) Clinical results and outcome improvement over time in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 33(22):2019–2025. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4026
Lingsma H, Andriessen TM, Haitsema I, Horn J, van der Naalt J, Franschman G, Maas AI, Vos PE, Steyerberg EW (2013) Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the IMPACT models and the role of extracranial injuries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74(2):639–646. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d602e
Patel VI, Thadepalli H, Patel PV, Mandal AK (2004) Thoracoabdominal injuries in the elderly: 25 years of experience. J Natl Med Assoc 96(12):1553–1557
Hsieh CH, Hsu SY, Hsieh HY, Chen YC (2017) Differences between the sexes in motorcycle-related injuries and fatalities at a Taiwanese level I trauma center. Biomed J 40(2):113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2016.10.005
Liang CC, Liu HT, Rau CS, Hsu SY, Hsieh HY, Hsieh CH (2015) Motorcycle-related hospitalization of adolescents in a Level I trauma center in southern Taiwan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr 15:105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0419-3
Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS (1987) Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma 27(4):370–378
Butcher N, Balogh ZJ (2009) The definition of polytrauma: the need for international consensus. Injury 40(Suppl 4):S12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.032
Butcher NE, Balogh ZJ (2014) Update on the definition of polytrauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40(2):107–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-014-0391-x
Pape HC, Lefering R, Butcher N, Peitzman A, Leenen L, Marzi I, Lichte P, Josten C, Bouillon B, Schmucker U, Stahel P, Giannoudis P, Balogh Z (2014) The definition of polytrauma revisited: an international consensus process and proposal of the new ‘Berlin definition’. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77(5):780–786. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000453
Rau CS, Wu SC, Kuo PJ, Chen YC, Chien PC, Hsieh HY, Hsieh CH (2017) Polytrauma defined by the New Berlin definition: a validation test based on propensity-score matching approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091045
Frenzel S, Krenn P, Heinz T, Negrin LL (2017) Does the applied polytrauma definition notably influence outcome and patient population?—a retrospective analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 25(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-017-0400-2
Pothmann CEM, Baumann S, Jensen KO, Mica L, Osterhoff G, Simmen HP, Sprengel K (2018) Assessment of polytraumatized patients according to the Berlin Definition: Does the addition of physiological data really improve interobserver reliability? PLoS ONE 13(8):e0201818. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201818
Johnson NB, Hayes LD, Brown K, Hoo EC, Ethier KA, Centers for Disease C, Prevention (2014) CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors–United States, 2005–2013. MMWR Suppl 63(4):3–27
Aldrian S, Wernhart S, Negrin L, Halat G, Schwendenwein E, Vecsei V, Hajdu S (2012) Epidemiological and economic aspects of polytrauma management in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr 124(3–4):78–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-011-0105-x
Kristiansen T, Lossius HM, Rehn M, Kristensen P, Gravseth HM, Roislien J, Soreide K (2014) Epidemiology of trauma: a population-based study of geographical risk factors for injury deaths in the working-age population of Norway. Injury 45(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.007
de Vries R, Reininga IHF, de Graaf MW, Heineman E, El Moumni M, Wendt KW (2019) Older polytrauma: mortality and complications. Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.024
Injury GBDTB, Spinal Cord Injury C (2019) Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 18(1):56–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30415-0
da Costa LGV, Carmona MJC, Malbouisson LM, Rizoli S, Rocha-Filho JA, Cardoso RG, Auler-Junior JOC (2017) Independent early predictors of mortality in polytrauma patients: a prospective, observational, longitudinal study. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 72(8):461–468. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(08)02
Yucel N, Ozturk Demir T, Derya S, Oguzturk H, Bicakcioglu M, Yetkin F (2018) Potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe blunt multiple trauma who survive initial resuscitation. Emerg Med Int 2018:6461072. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6461072
Leitgeb J, Mauritz W, Brazinova A, Majdan M, Wilbacher I (2013) Impact of concomitant injuries on outcomes after traumatic brain injury. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(5):659–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1710-0
Gennarelli TA, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS, Alves WM (1989) Mortality of patients with head injury and extracranial injury treated in trauma centers. J Trauma 29(9):1193–1201 (discussion 1201–1192)
Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Lecky FE, Lu J, Weir J, Butcher I, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Perel P, Maas AI, Steyerberg EW, International Mission on Prognosis Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury Study G, Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury Trial C, Trauma A, Research N (2012) Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic model. Crit Care Med 40(5):1609–1617. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824519ce
Rau CS, Wu SC, Chien PC, Kuo PJ, Chen YC, Hsieh HY, Hsieh CH (2017) Prediction of mortality in patients with isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage using a decision tree classifier: a retrospective analysis based on a trauma registry system. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111420
Cnossen MC, Lingsma HF, Tenovuo O, Maas AIR, Menon D, Steyerberg EW, Ribbers GM, Polinder S (2017) Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a survey in 70 European neurotrauma centres participating in the CENTER-TBI study. J Rehabil Med 49(5):395–401. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2216
Lingsma HF, Roozenbeek B, Steyerberg EW, Murray GD, Maas AI (2010) Early prognosis in traumatic brain injury: from prophecies to predictions. Lancet Neurol 9(5):543–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70065-X
Funding
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna. There is no funding source.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The local Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (EK 1816/2016). The study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
The manuscript was approved by all authors for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Weihs, V., Heel, V., Dedeyan, M. et al. Age and traumatic brain injury as prognostic factors for late-phase mortality in patients defined as polytrauma according to the New Berlin Definition: experiences from a level I trauma center. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141, 1677–1681 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03626-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03626-w