Abstract
Background
The prevalence of delirium in hospitalized patients is high, but delirium is frequently not identified by treating physicians in emergency departments (EDs). Although the number of elderly patients admitted to EDs is increasing, no data on prevalence, identification and outcome of delirious elderly patients in German EDs exist.
Objectives
To evaluate the prevalence and identification of delirium in elderly patients in a German ED and to identify characteristics of delirium in elderly ED patients.
Methods
Evaluation of data from a prospective single-center observational study. The study was conducted in the interdisciplinary ED of an urban university-affiliated hospital receiving approximately 80,000 visits per year. The shortened Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) was used to screen 133 consecutive ED patients, aged 75 years and older, for delirium. Comorbid conditions were ascertained by patient interview and review of medical records. Data concerning patient mortality and current living status were collected 28 days after the ED visit in a structured telephone interview.
Results
A positive CAM result was recorded in 14.3 % of cases; 68.4 % of these CAM-positive patients were not identified as being delirious by the ED physician. The 28-day mortality was higher among patients with delirium. Dependency on external help, polypharmacy, pre-existing cognitive or mobility impairments and the presence of any care level were strongly associated with delirium.
Conclusion
Elderly patients with known risk factors should be routinely assessed for delirium in the ED with a standardized assessment tool such as the CAM.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Die Prävalenz des Delirs bei hospitalisierten Patienten ist hoch. Allerdings wird ein Delir in der Notaufnahme von den Behandelnden häufig nicht erkannt. Obwohl die Anzahl älterer Patienten in der Notaufnahme stetig steigt, gibt es aus Deutschland noch keine Daten zur Prävalenz, Identifizierungsrate und dem weiteren Verlauf deliranter Patienten in der Notaufnahme.
Ziele der Arbeit
Die Arbeit befasst sich mit der Evaluierung der Prävalenz und der Identifizierungsrate deliranter älterer Patienten in einer deutschen Notaufnahme sowie mit der Identifizierung von Patientencharakteristika älterer Patienten mit Delir in der Notaufnahme.
Methoden
Die prospektive monozentrische Beobachtungsstudie wurde in der interdisziplinären Notaufnahme eines kommunalen Lehrkrankenhauses mit etwa 80.000 Besuchern pro Jahr durchgeführt. Mit der Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) wurden 133 Patienten ≥ 75 Jahre untersucht, die sich konsekutiv in der Notaufnahme vorstellten. Komorbiditäten wurde mittels Anamnese und Durchsicht der Patientenunterlagen erhoben. Mortalität und die aktuelle Versorgungsform wurden anhand eines strukturierten Telefoninterviews 28 Tage nach Vorstellung in der Notaufnahme erhoben.
Ergebnisse
Eine positive CAM wurde in 14,3 % der Fälle erhoben und 68,4 % der Patienten mit positiver CAM wurden von den Ärzten der Notaufnahme nicht als delirant erkannt. Die 28-Tage-Mortalität war bei Patienten mit Delir erhöht. Die Abhängigkeit von externen Hilfen, Polypharmakotherapie, vorbestehende Einschränkungen der Kognition und Mobilität sowie das Bestehen einer Pflegestufe zeigten einen engen Zusammenhang mit dem Vorhandensein eines Delirs.
Schlussfolgerung
Bei älteren Patienten mit bekannten Risikofaktoren sollte in der Notaufnahme regelmäßig ein Delir-Assessment mittels eines validierten Instruments, z. B. CAM, erfolgen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bickel H (2007) German Version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) for detection of delirium. Psychosom Konsliarpsychiatr 1:224–228
Biese KJ, Roberts E, LaMantia M et al (2011) Effect of a geriatric curriculum on emergency medicine resident attitudes, knowledge, and decision making. Acad Emerg Med 18:S92–S96
Borson S, Scanlan J, Brush M et al (2000) The mini-cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 15:1021–1027
Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251
Downing A, Wilson R (2005) Older people’s use of accident and emergency services. Age Ageing 34:24–30
Edlund A, Lundström M, Sandberg O et al (2007) Symptom profile of delirium in older people with and without dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 20:166–171
Elie M, Rousseau F, Cole M et al (2000) Prevalence and detection of delirium in elderly emergency department patients. CMAJ 163:977–981
Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B et al (2004) Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA 291:1753–1762
Han JH et al (2009) Delirium in older emergency department patients: recognition, risk factors, and psychomotor subtypes. Acad Emerg Med 16:193–200
Hustey FM, Meldon SW, Smith MD, Lex CK (2003) The effect of mental status screening on the care of elderly emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med 41:678–684
Inouye SK (2006) Delirium in older persons. N Engl J Med 354:1157–1165
Inouye SK (2003) The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM): training manual and coding guide. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven
Inouye SK (1994) The dilemma of delirium: clinical and research controversies regarding diagnosis and evaluation of delirium in hospitalized elderly medical patients. Am J Med 97:278–288
Inouye SK, Dyck CH van, Alessi CA et al (1990) Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 113:941–948
Kakuma R, Fort GG du, Arsenault L et al (2003) Delirium in older emergency department patients discharged home: effect on survival. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:443–450
Lewis LM, Miller DK, Morley JE et al (1995) Unrecognized delirium in ED geriatric patients. Am J Emerg Med 13:142–145
McCusker J, Cole M, Abrahamowicz M et al (2002) Delirium predicts 12-month mortality. Arch Intern Med 162:457–463
McCusker J, Cole MG, Dendukuri N, Belzile E (2003) Does delirium increase hospital stay? J Am Geriatr Soc 51:1539–1546
McCusker J, Cole M, Dendukuri N et al (2001) Delirium in older medical inpatients and subsequent cognitive and functional status: a prospective study. CMAJ 165:575–583
McNicoll L, Pisani MA, Ely EW et al (2005) Detection of delirium in the intensive care unit: comparison of confusion assessment method fort he intensive care unit with confusion assessment method ratings. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:495–500
Naughton BJ, Moran MB, Kadah H et al (1995) Delirium and other cognitive impairment in older adults in an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 25:751–755
Prendergast HM, Jurivich D, Edison M et al (2010) Preparing the front line for the increase in the aging population: geriatric curriculum development for an emergency medicine residency program. J Emerg Med 38:386–392
Rockwood K, Cosway S, Stolee P et al (1994) Increasing the recognition of delirium in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 42:252–256
Terrell KM, Hustey FM, Hwang U et al (2009) Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) geriatric task force. Quality indicators for geriatric emergency care. Acad Emerg Med 16:441–449
Wei LA, Fearing MA, Sternberg EJ, Inouye SK (2008) The confusion assessment method: a systematic review of current usage. J Am Geriatr Soc 56(5):823–830
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Conflict of interest. K. Singler, U.Thiem, M. Christ, P. Zenk, R. Biber, C.C. Sieber and H-J. Heppner state that there are no conflicts of interest.
All studies on humans described in the present manuscript were carried out with the approval of the responsible ethics committee and in accordance with national law and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (in its current, revised form). Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singler, K., Thiem, U., Christ, M. et al. Aspects and assessment of delirium in old age. Z Gerontol Geriat 47, 680–685 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-014-0615-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-014-0615-z