Skip to main content
Log in

Choosing Wisely

Ein Modell für das deutsche Gesundheitswesen?

Choosing Wisely

A model for the German health care system?

  • Beiträge zum Themenschwerpunkt
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Das American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) startete 2011 die Choosing Wisely Initiative (CWI).

Material und Methoden

Mit dieser Initiative werden fachspezifische Top-5-Listen mit der Zielsetzung erstellt, diagnostische und therapeutische Maßnahmen, die den Patienten nicht nützen, sondern potenziell sogar schaden, zu reduzieren und damit die Kosten im Gesundheitswesen zu senken. Die von der American Geriatrics Society und der American Medical Director Association 2013 veröffentlichten Vorschläge werden diskutiert.

Ergebnisse

Der Prozess, so einfach er zunächst erscheint, wirft dennoch vielfältige Fragen auf. Eine Übertragung auf Deutschland scheint grundsätzlich möglich, sollte aber weitere Aspekte des Gesundheitswesen und seiner Organisation berücksichtigen.

Abstract

Background

In 2011 the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) started the Choosing Wisely campaign.

Materials and methods

The goal was to establish top 5 lists by the medical societies to reduce diagnostic and therapeutic procedures which are not necessary or are potentially harmful, and thereby lower health care costs. The lists contributed by the American Geriatric Society and the American Medical Director Association in 2013 will be discussed.

Conclusion

At first glance, the idea seems simple, but numerous questions remain. Transferring this process to Germany appears theoretically possible, but various aspects of the health care system should be taken into consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. http://www.abimfoundation.org/Initiatives/Choosing-Wisely.aspx. Zugegriffen: 29. Nov. 2013

  2. Brook RH (2011) The role of physicians in controlling medical care costs and reducing waste. JAMA 306:650–651

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cassel CK, Guest JA (2012) Choosing Wisely. Helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. JAMA 307:1801–1802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moriates C, Soni K, Lai A, Ranji S (2013) The value in the evidence. Teaching residents to „Choose Wisely“. JAMA Intern Med 173:308–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith CD et al (2012) Teaching high-value, cost-conscious care to residents: the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine – American College of Physicians Curriculum. Ann Intern Med 157:284–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenbaum L, Lamas D (2012) Cents and sensitivity – teaching physicians to think about costs. N Engl J Med 367:99–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frist WH (2005) Health care in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 352:267–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brody H (2012) From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance. N Engl J Med 366:1949–1951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenbaum L (2013) The whole ball game – overcoming the blind spots in health care reform. N Engl J Med 368:959–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. AGS Choosing Wisely Workgroup (2013) American Geriatrics Society identifies five things that healthcare providers and patients should question. J Am Geriatr Soc 61:622–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vance J (2013) AMDA – Choosing Wisely. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:639–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Resnick B, Fick DM (2013) The Choosing Wisely® campaign and nurses role in dissemination. Geriatr Nurs 34:179–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fick DM, Resnick B (2013) The choosing wisely® campaign and nurses‘ role in dissemination. J Gerontol Nurs 39:4–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. http://www.americangeriatrics.org/files/documents/ChoosingWiselyInsomniaAGS_ER.pdf. Zugegriffen 29. Nov. 2013

  15. http://www.americangeriatrics.org/files/documents/AntibioticsUTI.pdf. Zugegriffen 29. Nov. 2013

  16. Fowler FJ Jr, Gerstein BS, Barry MJ (2013) How patient centered are medical decisions? Results of a national survey. JAMA Intern Med 173:1215–1221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lipitz-Snyderman A, Bach PB (2013) When less is more…more or less. JAMA Intern Med 173:1277–1278

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lipkin M (2013) Shared decision making. JAMA Intern Med 173:1204–1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tak HJ, Ruhnke GW, Meltzer DO (2013) Association with patient preferences for participation in decision making with length of stay and costs among hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med 173:1195–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith AK, Lo B, Sudore R (2013) When previous expressed wishes conflict with best interests. JAMA Intern Med 173:1241–1245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Briesacher BA, Tjia J, Field T et al (2013) Antipsychotic use among nursing home residents. JAMA 309:440–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maguire A, Hughes C, Cardwell C, O’Reilly D (2013) Psychotropic medications and the transition into care: a national data linkage study. J Am Geriatr Soc 61:215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen Y, Briesacher BA, Field T et al (2010) Unexplained variation across US nursing homes in antipsychotic prescribing rates. Arch Intern Med 170:89–95

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lemay CA, Mazor KM, Field TS et al (2013) Knowledge of and perceived need for evidence-based education about antipsychotic medications among nursing home leadership and staff. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:895–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tena JM, Mitchell SL, Gozalo PL et al (2010) Hospital characteristics associated with feeding tube placement in nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment. JAMA 303:544–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lopez RP, Amella EJ, Strumpf NE et al (2010) The influence of nursing home culture on the use of feeding tubes. Arch Intern Med 170:83–88

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee YY, Roberts CL, Patterson JA et al (2013) Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates. Med J Aust 199:348–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fuso L, Evangelista A, Pagano E et al (2011) Variation in gynecological oncology follow-up practice: attributable to cancer centers or to patient characteristics? A Piedmont Regional Oncology Network Study. Tumori 97:551–558

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo YF et al (2013) Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med 173:542–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dorsey ER (2013) Choosing Wisely. You get what you pay for. Neurology 81:946–947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C et al (2005) Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA 294:716–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tinetti ME, Bogardus ST Jr, Agostini JV (2004) Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. N Engl J Med 351:2870–2874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity (2012) Patient-centered care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: a stepwise approach from the American Geriatrics Society: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:1957–1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kitzman DW, Rich MW (2010) Age disparities in heart failure research. JAMA 304:1950–1951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. OECD (2013) Health at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2013-en. Zugegriffen: 29. Nov. 2013

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. M. Gogol gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Gogol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gogol, M. Choosing Wisely . Z Gerontol Geriat 47, 23–26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-013-0594-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-013-0594-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation