Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Strictureplasty versus bowel resection for the surgical management of fibrostenotic Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Strictureplasty (SPX) conserves bowel length and minimizes the risk of developing short bowel syndrome in patients undergoing surgery for Crohn’s disease (CD). However, SPX may be associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared with bowel resection (BR).

Aim

We sought to compare morbidity and recurrence following SPX and BR in patients with fibrostenotic CD.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Observational studies that compared outcomes of CD patients undergoing either SPX or BR were identified. Log hazard ratios (InHR) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and their standard errors were calculated from Kaplan–Meier plots or Cox regression models and pooled using the inverse variance method. Dichotomous variables were pooled as odds ratios (OR) using the Mantel–Haenszel method. Continuous variables were pooled as weighted mean differences.

Results

Twelve studies of 1026 CD patients (SPX n = 444, 43.27%; BR with or without SPX n = 582, 56.72%) were eligible for inclusion. There was an increased likelihood of disease recurrence with SPX than with BR (OR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.03, 2.52; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%). Patients who had a SPX alone had a significantly reduced RFS than those who underwent BR (HR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.08, 2.01; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). There was no difference in morbidity between the groups (OR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.26, 1.28; p = 0.18; I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

SPX should only be performed in those patients with Crohn’s strictures that are at high risk for short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure; otherwise, BR is the favored surgical technique for the management of fibrostenotic CD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cosnes J, Cattan S, Blain A, Beaugerie L, Carbonnel F, Parc R, Gendre JP (2002) Long-term evolution of disease behavior of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 8(4):244–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomollon F, Dignass A, Annese V et al (2017) 3rd European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease 2016: part 1: diagnosis and medical management. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis. 11(1):3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, Mantzaris GJ, Kornbluth A, Rachmilewitz D, Lichtiger S, D’Haens G, Diamond RH, Broussard DL, Tang KL, van der Woude C, Rutgeerts P, SONIC Study Group (2010) Infliximab, azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 362(15):1383–1395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rieder F, Fiocchi C, Rogler G (2017) Mechanisms, management, and treatment of fibrosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 152(2):340–350.e346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouguen G, Peyrin-Biroulet L (2011) Surgery for adult Crohn’s disease: what is the actual risk? Gut 60(9):1178–1181. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.234617

  6. Yamamoto T (2005) Factors affecting recurrence after surgery for Crohn’s disease. World Journal of Gastroenterology Review 11(26):3971–3979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thirlby RC, Land JC, Fenster LF, Lonborg R (1998) Effect of surgery on health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective study. Arch Surg 133(8):826–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mege D, Garrett K, Milsom J, Sonoda T, Michelassi F (2019) Changing trends in surgery for abdominal Crohn’s disease. Color Dis 21(2):200–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kinash RG, Fischer D, Lukie B, Carr T (1993) Inflammatory bowel disease impact and patient characteristics. Gastroenterology Nursing 15(4):147–154 

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fazi M, Giudici F, Luceri C, Pronesti M, Tonelli F (2016) Long-term results and recurrence-related risk factors for Crohn disease in patients undergoing side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty. JAMA Surgery 151(5):452–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Uchino M, Ikeuchi H, Bando T, Matsuoka H, Takahashi Y, Takesue Y, Matsumoto T, Tomita N (2012) Risk factors for short bowel syndrome in patients with Crohn’s disease. Surg Today 42(5):447–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee E, Papaioannou N (1982) Minimal surgery for chronic obstruction in patients with extensive or universal Crohn’s disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 64(4):229–233

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamamoto T, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP (2007) Safety and efficacy of strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50(11):1968–1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ambe R, Campbell L, Cagir B (2012) A comprehensive review of strictureplasty techniques in Crohn’s disease: types, indications, comparisons, and safety. J Gastrointest Surg 16(1):209–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jobanputra S, Weiss EG (2007) Strictureplasty. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery 20(4):294–302

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. de Buck van Overstraeten A, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A (2016) Modified side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty over the ileocaecal valve for the surgical treatment of terminal ileal Crohn’s disease: the ultimate bowel sparing technique? Colorectal Disease 18(8):O311–O313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Stappen J, De Buck Van Overstraeten A, Ferrante M et al (2017) Long-term outcome and endoscopic healing rates following long modified side-to-side strictureplasties. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Conference Abstract 11:S273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell L, Ambe R, Weaver J, Marcus SM, Cagir B (2012) Comparison of conventional and nonconventional strictureplasties in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 55(6):714–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson JS (2000) Comparison of massive vs. repeated resection leading to short bowel syndrome. J Gastrointest Surg 4(1):101–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reese GE, Purkayastha S, Tilney HS, von Roon A, Yamamoto T, Tekkis PP (2007) Strictureplasty vs resection in small bowel Crohn’s disease: an evaluation of short-term outcomes and recurrence. Colorectal Disease 9(8):686–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Borley NR, Mortensen NJ, Jewell DP (1997) Preventing postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 84(11):1493–1502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Greenstein AJ, Sachar DB, Pasternack BS, Janowitz HD (1975) Reoperation and recurrence in Crohn’s colitis and ileocolitis crude and cumulative rates. N Engl J Med 293(14):685–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ozuner G, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Strong SA (1996) Reoperative rates for Crohn’s disease following strictureplasty. Long-term analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 39(11):1199–1203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamamoto T, Bain IM, Allan RN, Keighley MR (1999) An audit of strictureplasty for small-bowel Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 42(6):797–803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tonelli F, Ficari F (2000) Strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease: surgical option. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 43(7):920–926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cristaldi M, Sampietro GM, Danelli PG, Bollani S, Bianchi Porro G, Taschieri AM (2000) Long-term results and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 138 consecutive patients operated on for Crohn’s disease using "bowel-sparing" techniques. Am J Surg 179(4):266–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Broering DC, Eisenberger CF, Koch A, Bloechle C, Knoefel WT, Izbicki JR (2001) Quality of life after surgical therapy of small bowel stenosis in Crohn’s disease. Dig Surg 18(2):124–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sampietro GM, Cristaldi M, Maconi G et al (2004) A prospective, longitudinal study of nonconventional strictureplasty in Crohn’s disease. Journal of American College of Surgeons 199:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fearnhead NS, Chowdhury R, Box B, George BD, Jewell DP, Mortensen NJ (2006) Long-term follow-up of strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 93(4):475–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fichera A, Lovadina S, Rubin M, Cimino F, Hurst RD, Michelassi F (2006) Patterns and operative treatment of recurrent Crohn’s disease: a prospective longitudinal study. Surgery. 140(4):649–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Roy P, Kumar D (2006) Intervention-free interval following strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease. World J Surg:301020–301026

  32. Tonelli F, Fazi M, Di Martino C (2010) Ileocecal strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease: long-term results and comparison with ileocecal resection. World J Surg 34(12):2860–2866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Romeo E, Jasonni V, Caldaro T et al (2012) Strictureplasty and intestinal resection: different options in complicated pediatric-onset Crohn disease. Journal of Pediatric Surgery Conference Paper 47(5):944–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bamford R, Hay A, Kumar D (2014) Resection leads to less recurrence than strictureplasty in a paediatric population with obstructive Crohn’s disease. Surgery Research and Practice 2014:709045

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Michelassi F, Mege D, Rubin M, Hurst RD (2019) Long-term results of the side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty in Crohn disease: 25-year follow-up and outcomes. Ann Surg

  36. Lindhagen T, Ekelund G, Leandoer L, Hildell J, Lindstrom C, Wenckert A (1983) Recurrence rate after surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 18(8):1037–1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Williams JG, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM (1991) Recurrence of Crohn’s disease after resection. Br J Surg 78(1):10–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. de Buck van Overstraeten A, Vermeire S, Vanbeckevoort D et al (2016) Modified side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty over the ileocaecal valve: an alternative to ileocaecal resection in extensive terminal ileal Crohn’s disease. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis. 10(4):437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Canavan C, Abrams KR, Mayberry J (2006) Meta-analysis: colorectal and small bowel cancer risk in patients with Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23(8):1097–1104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Coffey JC, O’Leary DP, Kiernan MG, Faul P (2016) The mesentery in Crohn’s disease: friend or foe? Curr Opin Gastroenterol 32(4):267–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Borley NR, Mortensen NJ, Jewell DP, Warren BF (2000) The relationship between inflammatory and serosal connective tissue changes in ileal Crohn’s disease: evidence for a possible causative link. J Pathol 190(2):196–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Guedj K, Abitbol Y, Cazals-Hatem D et al (2019) Adipocytes orchestrate the formation of tertiary lymphoid organs in the creeping fat of Crohn’s disease affected mesentery. J Autoimmun

  43. Coffey CJ, Kiernan MG, Sahebally SM et al (2018) Inclusion of the mesentery in ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease is associated with reduced surgical recurrence. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis. 12(10):1139–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. de Groof EJ, van der Meer JHM, Tanis PJ, de Bruyn JR, van Ruler O, D’Haens GRAM, van den Brink G, Bemelman WA, Wildenberg ME, Buskens CJ (2019) Persistent mesorectal inflammatory activity is associated with complications after proctectomy in Crohn’s disease. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis 13(3):285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ryan JM, Rogers AC, O’Toole A, Burke JP (2019) Meta-analysis of histological margin positivity in the prediction of recurrence after Crohn’s resection. Dis Colon Rectum 62(7):882–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jeejeebhoy KN (2002) Short bowel syndrome: a nutritional and medical approach. CMAJ. 166(10):1297–1302

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wright EK, Kamm MA, De Cruz P et al (2015) Effect of intestinal resection on quality of life in Crohn’s disease. Journal of Crohn's & Colitis 9(6):452–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wright EK, Kamm MA (2015) Impact of drug therapy and surgery on quality of life in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Inflamm Bowel Dis 21(5):1187–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ponsioen CY, de Groof EJ, Eshuis EJ, Gardenbroek TJ, Bossuyt PMM, Hart A, Warusavitarne J, Buskens CJ, van Bodegraven A, Brink MA, Consten ECJ, van Wagensveld B, Rijk MCM, Crolla RMPH, Noomen CG, Houdijk APJ, Mallant RC, Boom M, Marsman WA, Stockmann HB, Mol B, de Groof AJ, Stokkers PC, D'Haens GR, Bemelman WA, LIR!C study group (2017) Laparoscopic ileocaecal resection versus infliximab for terminal ileitis in Crohn’s disease: a randomised controlled, open-label, multicentre trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2(11):785–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ha FJ, Thong L, Khalil H (2017) Quality of life after intestinal resection in patients with Crohn disease: a systematic review. Dig Surg 34(5):355–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Michelassi F (2016) Long-term results of side-to-side isoperistaltic strictureplasty for Crohn disease. JAMA Surg 151(5):461. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mitchell JE, Breuer RI, Zuckerman L, Berlin J, Schilli R, Dunn JK (1980) The colon influences ileal resection diarrhea. Dig Dis Sci 25(1):33–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Johnston WF, Stafford C, Francone TD, Read TE, Marcello PW, Roberts PL et al (2017) What is the risk of anastomotic leak after repeat instinal resection in patients with Crohn’s disease? Dis Colon Rectum 60(12):1299–1306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. D’Haens G, Baert F, van Assche G et al (2008) Early combined immunosuppression or conventional management in patients with newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease: an open randomised trial. Lancet (London, England) 371(9613):660–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Baert F, Moortgat L, Van Assche G et al (2010) Mucosal healing predicts sustained clinical remission in patients with early-stage Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 138(2):463–468 quiz e410–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Amezaga AJ, Van Assche G (2016) Practical approaches to "top-down" therapies for Crohn’s disease. Current Gastroenterology Reports 18(7):35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Silverstein MD, Loftus EV, Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Feagan BG, Nietert PJ, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR (1999) Clinical course and costs of care for Crohn’s disease: Markov model analysis of a population-based cohort. Gastroenterology. 117(1):49–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Latella G, Cocco A, Angelucci E et al (2009) Clinical course of Crohn’s disease first diagnosed at surgery for acute abdomen. Dig Liver Dis Article 41(4):269–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. An V, Cohen L, Lawrence M, Thomas M, Andrews J, Moore J (2016) Early surgery in Crohn’s disease a benefit in selected cases. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8(7):492–500

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Aratari A, Papi C, Leandro G, Viscido A, Capurso L, Caprilli R (2007) Early versus late surgery for ileo-caecal Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther Review 26(10):1303–1312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Lee JM, Lee KM, Kim JS et al (2018) Postoperative course of Crohn disease according to timing of bowel resection: results from the CONNECT Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(16):e0459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Golovics PA, Lakatos L, Nagy A et al (2013) Is early limited surgery associated with a more benign disease course in Crohn’s disease? World Journal of Gastroenterology 19(43):7701–7710

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Eshuis EJ, Stokkers PC, Bemelman WA (2010a) Decision-making in ileocecal Crohn’s disease management: surgery versus pharmacotherapy. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 4(2):181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Eshuis EJ, Slors JF, Stokkers PC, Sprangers MA, Ubbink DT, Cuesta MA, Pierik EG, Bemelman WA (2010b) Long-term outcomes following laparoscopically assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 97(4):563–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Latella G, Caprilli R, Travis S (2011) In favour of early surgery in Crohn’s disease: a hypothesis to be tested. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis. 5(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Regueiro M, Velayos F, Greer JB et al (2017) American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of Crohn’s disease after surgical resection. Gastroenterology 152(1):277–295.e273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Shapiro S (1994a) Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 140(9):771–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Shapiro S (1994b) Is there is or is there ain’t no baby? Dr. Shapiro replies to Drs. Petitti and Greenland. Am J Epidemiol 140(9):788–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T, Friedenreich C (1999) Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 28(1):1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Egger M, Schneider M, Smith GD (1998) Meta-analysis spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. Bmj. 316(7125):140–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Petitti DB (1994) Of babies and bathwater. Am J Epidemiol 140(9):779–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Greenland S (1994) Can meta-analysis be salvaged? Am J Epidemiol 140(9):783–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waqas T. Butt.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 18 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 15 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Butt, W.T., Ryan, É.J., Boland, M.R. et al. Strictureplasty versus bowel resection for the surgical management of fibrostenotic Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 35, 705–717 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03507-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03507-z

Keywords

Navigation