Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical interventions for high cryptoglandular perianal fistula

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Perianal fistulas, and specifically high perianal fistulas, remain a surgical treatment challenge. Many techniques have, and still are, being developed to improve outcome after surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed for surgical treatments for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas.

Methods

Medline (Pubmed, Ovid), Embase and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials on surgical treatments for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas. Two independent reviewers selected articles for inclusion based on title, abstract and outcomes described. The main outcome measurement was the recurrence/healing rate. Secondary outcomes were continence status, quality of life and complications.

Results

The number of randomized trials available was low. Fourteen studies could be included in the review. A meta-analysis could only be performed for the mucosa advancement flap versus the fistula plug, and did not show a result in favour of either technique in recurrence or complication rate. The mucosa advancement flap was the most investigated technique, but did not show an advantage over any other technique. Other techniques identified in randomized studies were seton treatment, medicated seton treatment, fibrin glue, autologous stem cells, island flap anoplasty, rectal wall advancement flap, ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, sphincter reconstruction, sphincter-preserving seton and techniques combined with antibiotics. None of these techniques seem superior to each other.

Conclusions

The best surgical treatment for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas could not be identified. More randomized controlled trials are needed to find the best treatment. The mucosa advancement flap is the most investigated technique available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sainio P (1984) Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynaecol 73(4):219–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cariati A (2013) Fistulotomy or seton in anal fistula: a decisional algorithm. Updates Surg 65(3):201–205. doi:10.1007/s13304-013-0216-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van der Hagen SJ, Baeten CG, Soeters PB, van Gemert WG (2006) Long-term outcome following mucosal advancement flap for high perianal fistulas and fistulotomy for low perianal fistulas: recurrent perianal fistulas: failure of treatment or recurrent patient disease? Int J Colorectal Dis 21(8):784–790. doi:10.1007/s00384-005-0072-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Koperen PJ, Wind J, Bemelman WA, Bakx R, Reitsma JB, Slors JF (2008) Long-term functional outcome and risk factors for recurrence after surgical treatment for low and high perianal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin. Dis Colon Rectum 51(10):1475–1481. doi:10.1007/s10350-008-9354-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubsky PC, Stift A, Friedl J, Teleky B, Herbst F (2008) Endorectal advancement flaps in the treatment of high anal fistula of cryptoglandular origin: full-thickness vs. mucosal-rectum flaps. Dis Colon Rectum 51(6):852–857. doi:10.1007/s10350-008-9242-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Soltani A, Kaiser AM (2010) Endorectal advancement flap for cryptoglandular or Crohn’s fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 53(4):486–495. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ce8b01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarrar A, Church J (2011) Advancement flap repair: a good option for complex anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 54(12):1537–1541. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822d7ddd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hjortrup A, Moesgaard F, Kjaergard J (1991) Fibrin adhesive in the treatment of perineal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 34(9):752–754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abel ME, Chiu YS, Russell TR, Volpe PA (1993) Autologous fibrin glue in the treatment of rectovaginal and complex fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 36(5):447–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson EK, Gaw JU, Armstrong DN (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49(3):371–376. doi:10.1007/s10350-005-0288-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K (2007) Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai 90(3):581–586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu WY, Aboulian A, Kaji AH, Kumar RR (2013) Long-term results of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for fistula-in-Ano. Dis Colon Rectum 56(3):343–347. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e318278164c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia-Olmo D, Herreros D, Pascual I, Pascual JA, Del-Valle E, Zorrilla J, De-La-Quintana P, Garcia-Arranz M, Pascual M (2009) Expanded adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex perianal fistula: a phase II clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52(1):79–86. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181973487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meinero P, Mori L (2011) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 15(4):417–422. doi:10.1007/s10151-011-0769-2

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilhelm A (2011) A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol 15(4):445–449. doi:10.1007/s10151-011-0726-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gottgens KW, Vening W, van der Hagen SJ, van Gemert WG, Smeets RR, Stassen LP, Baeten CG, Breukink SO (2014) Long-term results of mucosal advancement flap combined with platelet-rich plasma for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 57(2):223–227. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–34. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Ciga MA, Oteiza F, Armendariz P, de Miguel M (2009) Randomized clinical trial of anal fistula plug versus endorectal advancement flap for the treatment of high cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Br J Surg 96(6):608–612. doi:10.1002/bjs.6613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ab-b-k-r MM, Wen H, Huang HG, Chu H, Lu M, Chang ZS, Ai EH, Fan K (2010) Randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive surgery using acellular dermal matrix for complex anorectal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 16(26):3279–3286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van Koperen PJ, Bemelman WA, Gerhards MF, Janssen LW, van Tets WF, van Dalsen AD, Slors JF (2011) The anal fistula plug treatment compared with the mucosal advancement flap for cryptoglandular high transsphincteric perianal fistula: a double-blinded multicenter randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 54(4):387–393. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e318206043e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Altomare DF, Greco VJ, Tricomi N, Arcana F, Mancini S, Rinaldi M, d'Urso Pulvirenti A, La Torre F (2011) Seton or glue for trans-sphincteric anal fistulae: a prospective randomized crossover clinical trial. Colorectal Dis 13(1):82–86. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02056.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ellis CN, Clark S (2006) Fibrin glue as an adjunct to flap repair of anal fistulas: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 49(11):1736–1740. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0718-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gustafsson UM, Graf W (2006) Randomized clinical trial of local gentamicin-collagen treatment in advancement flap repair for anal fistula. Br J Surg 93(10):1202–1207. doi:10.1002/bjs.5398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Herreros MD, Garcia-Arranz M, Guadalajara H, De-La-Quintana P, Garcia-Olmo D, Group FC (2012) Autologous expanded adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular perianal fistulas: a phase III randomized clinical trial (FATT 1: fistula advanced therapy trial 1) and long-term evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 55(7):762–772. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e318255364a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ho KS, Ho YH (2005) Controlled, randomized trial of island flap anoplasty for treatment of trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano: early results. Tech Coloproctol 9(2):166–168. doi:10.1007/s10151-005-0220-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Research ICoM (1991) Multicentric randomized controlled clinical trial of Kshaarasootra (Ayurvedic medicated thread) in the management of fistula-in-ano. Indian Council of Medical Research. Indian J Med Res 94:177–185

    Google Scholar 

  28. Khafagy W, Omar W, El Nakeeb A, Fouda E, Yousef M, Farid M (2010) Treatment of anal fistulas by partial rectal wall advancement flap or mucosal advancement flap: a prospective randomized study. Int J Surg 8(4):321–325. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mushaya C, Bartlett L, Schulze B, Ho YH (2012) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract compared with advancement flap for complex anorectal fistulas requiring initial seton drainage. Am J Surg 204(3):283–289. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perez F, Arroyo A, Serrano P, Sanchez A, Candela F, Perez MT, Calpena R (2006) Randomized clinical and manometric study of advancement flap versus fistulotomy with sphincter reconstruction in the management of complex fistula-in-ano. Am J Surg 192(1):34–40. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Singer M, Cintron J, Nelson R, Orsay C, Bastawrous A, Pearl R, Sone J, Abcarian H (2005) Treatment of fistulas-in-ano with fibrin sealant in combination with intra-adhesive antibiotics and/or surgical closure of the internal fistula opening. Dis Colon Rectum 48(4):799–808. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-0898-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zbar AP, Ramesh J, Beer-Gabel M, Salazar R, Pescatori M (2003) Conventional cutting vs. internal anal sphincter-preserving seton for high trans-sphincteric fistula: a prospective randomized manometric and clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol 7(2):89–94. doi:10.1007/s10151-003-0016-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. O'Riordan JM, Datta I, Johnston C, Baxter NN (2012) A systematic review of the anal fistula plug for patients with Crohn’s and non-Crohn's related fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 55(3):351–358. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e318239d1e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jacob TJ, Perakath B, Keighley MR (2010) Surgical intervention for anorectal fistula. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12(5):CD006319. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006319.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hong KD, Kang S, Kalaskar S, Wexner SD (2014) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) to treat anal fistula: systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. doi:10.1007/s10151-014-1183-3

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Morelli U, Desiderio J, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G (2013) The treatment of anal fistulas with biologically derived products: is innovation better than conventional surgical treatment? An update. Tech Coloproctol 17(3):259–273. doi:10.1007/s10151-012-0948-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Subhas G, Singh Bhullar J, Al-Omari A, Unawane A, Mittal VK, Pearlman R (2012) Setons in the treatment of anal fistula: review of variations in materials and techniques. Dig Surg 29(4):292–300. doi:10.1159/000342398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Paul J.H. Göttgens for designing the figures showing the operative techniques.

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. W. A. Göttgens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Göttgens, K.W.A., Smeets, R.R., Stassen, L.P.S. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical interventions for high cryptoglandular perianal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 30, 583–593 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2091-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2091-8

Keywords

Navigation