Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

External coating of colonic anastomoses: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Colon anastomotic leakage remains both a frequent and serious complication in gastrointestinal surgery. External coating of colonic anastomoses has been proposed as a means to lower the rate of this complication. The aim of this review was to evaluate existing studies on external coating of colonic anastomoses.

Methods

CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched up to September 2011 to identify studies evaluating external coating of colonic anastomoses.

Results

Forty studies have evaluated 20 different coating materials, of which only fibrin sealant, omental pedicle graft, and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose have been used in humans. Fibrin sealant has shown positive, however not significant, results. Omental pedicle graft can be used safely, yet without beneficial effects, whereas hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose should be avoided due to increased complications. The remaining coating materials have solely been evaluated in experimental animals with many contradictory and few positive results.

Conclusions

External coating of colonic anastomoses has yet failed to show convincing results. Randomized clinical trials and high-quality experimental studies are warranted to determine the role of fibrin sealant, omental pedicle graft, and other coating materials for prevention of colon anastomotic leakage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Database for Colorectal Cancer (2009) Danish Colorectal Cancer Group: annual report

  2. Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM, Siu SK, Stevenson AR, Stitz R, Ho YH (2011) Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients. World J Surg 35(1):186–195. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0831-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borowski DW, Bradburn DM, Mills SJ, Bharathan B, Wilson RG, Ratcliffe AA, Kelly SB (2010) Volume-outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes. Br J Surg 97(9):1416–1430. doi:10.1002/bjs.7111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goriainov V, Miles AJ (2010) Anastomotic leak rate and outcome for laparoscopic intra-corporeal stapled anastomosis. J Minim Access Surg 6(1):6–10. doi:10.4103/0972-9941.62527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buchs NC, Gervaz P, Secic M, Bucher P, Mugnier-Konrad B, Morel P (2008) Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(3):265–270. doi:10.1007/s00384-007-0399-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thornton M, Joshi H, Vimalachandran C, Heath R, Carter P, Gur U, Rooney P (2011) Management and outcome of colorectal anastomotic leaks. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(3):313–320. doi:10.1007/s00384-010-1094-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akasu T, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Yamaguchi T, Fujita S, Moriya Y (2010) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 14(1):104–111. doi:10.1007/s11605-009-1067-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bae KB, Kim SH, Jung SJ, Hong KH (2010) Cyanoacrylate for colonic anastomosis; is it safe? Int J Colorectal Dis 25(5):601–606. doi:10.1007/s00384-009-0872-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoeppner J, Crnogorac V, Marjanovic G, Juttner E, Keck T, Weiser HF, Hopt UT (2009) Small intestinal submucosa for reinforcement of colonic anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(5):543–550. doi:10.1007/s00384-009-0637-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nursal TZ, Anarat R, Bircan S, Yildirim S, Tarim A, Haberal M (2004) The effect of tissue adhesive, octyl-cyanoacrylate, on the healing of experimental high-risk and normal colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 187(1):28–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–e34. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1006–1012. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Libutti SK, Oz MC, Forde KA, Auteri JS, Johnson JP, Bass LS, Treat MR (1990) Canine colonic anastomoses reinforced with dye-enhanced fibrinogen and a diode laser. Surg Endosc 4(2):97–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bourne GL (1960) The microscopic anatomy of the human amnion and chorion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 79:1070–1073

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dua HS, Gomes JA, King AJ, Maharajan VS (2004) The amniotic membrane in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol 49(1):51–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mermet I, Pottier N, Sainthillier JM, Malugani C, Cairey-Remonnay S, Maddens S, Riethmuller D, Tiberghien P, Humbert P, Aubin F (2007) Use of amniotic membrane transplantation in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 15(4):459–464. doi:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00252.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Subrahmanyam M (1995) Amniotic membrane as a cover for microskin grafts. Br J Plast Surg 48(7):477–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Talmi YP, Sigler L, Inge E, Finkelstein Y, Zohar Y (1991) Antibacterial properties of human amniotic membranes. Placenta 12(3):285–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Toda A, Okabe M, Yoshida T, Nikaido T (2007) The potential of amniotic membrane/amnion-derived cells for regeneration of various tissues. J Pharmacol Sci 105(3):215–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tseng SC, Li DQ, Ma X (1999) Suppression of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms, TGF-beta receptor type II, and myofibroblast differentiation in cultured human corneal and limbal fibroblasts by amniotic membrane matrix. J Cell Physiol 179(3):325–335. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199906)179:3<325::AID-JCP10>3.0.CO;2-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Uludag M, Citgez B, Ozkaya O, Yetkin G, Ozcan O, Polat N, Isgor A (2009) Effects of amniotic membrane on the healing of normal and high-risk colonic anastomoses in rats. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(7):809–817. doi:10.1007/s00384-009-0691-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pantelis D, Beissel A, Kahl P, Wehner S, Vilz TO, Kalff JC (2010) The effect of sealing with a fixed combination of collagen matrix-bound coagulation factors on the healing of colonic anastomoses in experimental high-risk mice models. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395(8):1039–1048. doi:10.1007/s00423-010-0703-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM, Jeekel H (1993) Transient protection of incomplete colonic anastomoses with fibrin sealant: an experimental study in the rat. J Surg Res 55(3):256–260. doi:10.1006/jsre.1993.1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ (2010) Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: the impact of fibrin glue. Am J Surg 199(4):435–441. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Akgun A, Kuru S, Uraldi C, Tekin O, Karip B, Tug T, Ongoren AU (2006) Early effects of fibrin sealant on colonic anastomosis in rats: an experimental and case–control study. Tech Coloproctol 10(3):208–214. doi:10.1007/s10151-006-0281-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kanellos I, Mantzoros I, Demetriades H, Kalfadis S, Kelpis T, Sakkas L, Betsis D (2004) Healing of colon anastomoses covered with fibrin glue after immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of 5-fluorouracil. Dis Colon Rectum 47(4):510–515. doi:10.1007/s10350-003-0085-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kanellos I, Christoforidis E, Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG, Sakkas L, Betsis D (2006) The healing of colon anastomosis covered with fibrin glue after early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Tech Coloproctol 10(2):115–120. doi:10.1007/s10151-006-0263-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kanellos D, Blouhos K, Pramateftakis MG, Kanellos I, Demetriades H, Sakkas L, Betsis D (2007) Effect of 5-fluorouracil plus interferon on the integrity of colonic anastomoses covering with fibrin glue. World J Surg 31(1):186–191. doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0094-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM, van den Ingh HF, Jeekel H (1992) Effect of antibiotics in fibrin sealant on healing colonic anastomoses in the rat. Br J Surg 79(6):525–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Byrne DJ, Hardy J, Wood RA, McIntosh R, Hopwood D, Cuschieri A (1992) Adverse influence of fibrin sealant on the healing of high-risk sutured colonic anastomoses. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37(6):394–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Giuratrabocchetta S, Rinaldi M, Cuccia F, Lemma M, Piscitelli D, Polidoro P, Altomare DF (2011) Protection of intestinal anastomosis with biological glues: an experimental randomized controlled trial. Tech Coloproctol 15(2):153–158. doi:10.1007/s10151-010-0674-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Houston KA, Rotstein OD (1988) Fibrin sealant in high-risk colonic anastomoses. Arch Surg 123(2):230–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hulkko OA, Haukipuro KA, Laitinen ST (1988) Fibrin glue protection of primary anastomosis in the obstructed left colon. An experimental study on the rat. Acta Chir Scand 154(1):49–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanellos I, Mantzoros I, Goulimaris I, Zacharakis E, Zavitsanakis A, Betsis D (2003) Effects of the use of fibrin glue around the colonic anastomosis of the rat. Tech Coloproctol 7(2):82–84. doi:10.1007/s10151-003-0014-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Karahasanoglu T, Alcicek S, Altunkaya E, Sahinler I, Goksel S, Sirin F, Ozbal A (1997) Effect of fibrin glue on irradiated colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 40(10):1240–1243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Oka H, Harrison RC, Burhenne HJ (1982) Effect of a biologic glue on the leakage rate of experimental rectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 143(5):561–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schreinemacher MH, Bloemen JG, van der Heijden SJ, Gijbels MJ, Dejong CH, Bouvy ND (2011) Collagen fleeces do not improve colonic anastomotic strength but increase bowel obstructions in an experimental rat model. Int J Colorectal Dis 26(6):729–735. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1158-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shinohara K, Kobayashi E, Yoshida T, Toyama N, Kiyozaki H, Fujimura A, Miyata M (1998) Effect of fibrin glue on small and large bowel anastomoses in the rat. Eur Surg Res 30(1):8–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Subhas G, Bhullar JS, Cook J, Shah A, Silberberg B, Andrus L, Decker M, Mittal VK (2011) Topical gentamicin does not provide any additional anastomotic strength when combined with fibrin glue. Am J Surg 201(3):339–343. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM, van den Ingh HF, Jeekel H (1992) Healing of ischemic colonic anastomosis: fibrin sealant does not improve wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum 35(9):884–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Medina M, Paddock HN, Connolly RJ, Schwaitzberg SD (1995) Novel antiadhesion barrier does not prevent anastomotic healing in a rabbit model. J Invest Surg 8(3):179–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, Kaufman HS, van Goor H, Wolff BG (2003) A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 46(10):1310–1319. doi:10.1097/01.DCR.0000089117.62296.E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Katsikas D, Sechas M, Antypas G, Floudas P, Moshovos K, Gogas J, Rigas A, Papacharalambous N, Skalkeas G (1977) Beneficial effect of omental wrapping of unsafe intestinal anastomoses. An experimental study in dogs. Int Surg 62(8):435–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lanter B, Mason RA (1979) Use of omental pedicle graft to protect low anterior colonic anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 22(7):448–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Flamant Y, Molkhou JM, Laborde Y (1998) Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after colonic or rectal resection: a prospective randomized study in 712 patients. French Associations for Surgical Research. Ann Surg 227(2):179–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hoeppner J, Wassmuth B, Marjanovic G, Timme S, Hopt UT, Keck T (2010) Anastomotic sealing by extracellular matrices (ECM) improves healing of colonic anastomoses in the critical early phase. J Gastrointest Surg 14(6):977–986. doi:10.1007/s11605-010-1191-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Eryilmaz R, Samuk M, Tortum OB, Akcakaya A, Sahin M, Goksel S (2007) The role of dura mater and free peritoneal graft in the reinforcement of colon anastomosis. J Invest Surg 20(1):15–21. doi:10.1080/08941930601126108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dilek ON, Bakir B, Dilek FH, Demirel H, Yigit MF (1996) Protection of intestinal anastomoses in septic environment with peritoneal graft and polyglycolic acid mesh: an experimental study. Acta Chir Belg 96(6):261–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gulati SM, Thusoo TK, Kakar A, Iyenger B, Pandey KK (1982) Comparative study of free omental, peritoneal, Dacron velour, and Marlex mesh reinforcement of large-bowel anastomosis: an experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 25(6):517–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lozada JL, Caplanis N, Proussaefs P, Willardsen J, Kammeyer G (2001) Platelet-rich plasma application in sinus graft surgery: part I—background and processing techniques. J Oral Implantol 27(1):38–42. doi:10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0038:PPAISG>2.3.CO;2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Yol S, Tekin A, Yilmaz H, Kucukkartallar T, Esen H, Caglayan O, Tatkan Y (2008) Effects of platelet rich plasma on colonic anastomosis. J Surg Res 146(2):190–194. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2007.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Aysan E, Bektas H, Ersoz F, Sari S, Kaygusuz A (2010) A novel colonic anastomosis technique involving fixed polyglycolic acid mesh. Int J Clin Exp Med 3(4):341–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Henne-Bruns D, Kreischer HP, Schmiegelow P, Kremer B (1990) Reinforcement of colon anastomoses with polyglycolic acid mesh: an experimental study. Eur Surg Res 22(4):224–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Aysan E, Dincel O, Bektas H, Alkan M (2008) Polypropylene mesh covered colonic anastomosis. Results of a new anastomosis technique. Int J Surg 6(3):224–229. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Irkorucu O, Ucan BH, Cakmak GK, Tascilar O, Emre AU, Ofluoglu E, Bahadir B, Karakaya K, Demirtas C, Pasaoglu H, Ankarali H, Comert M (2009) Effect of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate on ischemic anastomosis of the left colon. J Invest Surg 22(3):188–194. doi:10.1080/08941930902866261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ozel SK, Kazez A, Akpolat N (2006) Does a fibrin-collagen patch support early anastomotic healing in the colon? An experimental study. Tech Coloproctol 10(3):233–236. doi:10.1007/s10151-006-0285-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Trowbridge PE, Howes EL (1967) Reinforcement of colon anastomoses using polyurethane foam treated with neomycin. An experimental study. Am J Surg 113(2):236–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J, Scumacher-Petersen C, Achiam M (2011) Choosing the best animal species to mimic clinical colon anastomotic leakage in humans: a qualitative systematic review. Eur Surg Res 47:173–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Komen N, van der Wal HC, Ditzel M, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel H, Lange JF (2009) Colorectal anastomotic leakage: a new experimental model. J Surg Res 155(1):7–12. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2008.08.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Nordentoft T, Sorensen M (2007) Leakage of colon anastomoses: development of an experimental model in pigs. Eur Surg Res 39(1):14–16. doi:10.1159/000096975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheragwandi A, Nieuwenhuis DH, Gagner M, Consten EC (2008) An update of available innovative staple line reinforcement materials in colorectal surgery. Surg Technol Int 17:131–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Adas G, Arikan S, Karatepe O, Kemik O, Ayhan S, Karaoz E, Kamali G, Eryasar B, Ustek D (2011) Mesenchymal stem cells improve the healing of ischemic colonic anastomoses (experimental study). Langenbecks Arch Surg 396(1):115–126. doi:10.1007/s00423-010-0717-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hoeppner J, Willa K, Timme S, Tittelbach-Helmrich D, Hopt UT, Keck T, Marjanovic G (2010) Reinforcement of colonic anastomoses with a collagenous double-layer matrix extracted from porcine dermis. Eur Surg Res 45(2):68–76. doi:10.1159/000318856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Christian Pommergaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pommergaard, HC., Achiam, M.P. & Rosenberg, J. External coating of colonic anastomoses: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 27, 1247–1258 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1547-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-012-1547-y

Keywords

Navigation