Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The negative influence of conversion from laparoscopic to open colorectal resection on early postoperative morbidity and outcome has been demonstrated several times. In this study, we analyzed the conversion rate and its influence on early postoperative morbidity and short-term oncological outcome following laparoscopic rectal resections.

Methods

From January 1998 to December 2006, 300 patients underwent laparoscopic resection due to rectal carcinoma at our institution. We compared the converted patient group with the non-converted patient group regarding demographical, clinical, surgical, and histological data, compounded with the early and late postoperative results.

Results

Two hundred seventy-four (91.3%) patients underwent laparoscopic rectal resection (LR), while conversion resection (CR) was necessary in 26 cases (8.6%). Conversion rate was 13% during the first 100 resections and decreased to 3% during the last 100 procedures (p = 0.035). Male gender, higher body mass index, and presence of T4-tumor were risk factors for conversion. Early postoperative complications were more frequent in the CR group than in the LR group. Concerning local tumor recurrence and overall survival, there was no significant difference between both groups (local recurrence, CR at 3.8% vs. LR at 4.5% and overall survival rate, CR at 76.9% vs. LR at 89.1%) after a median follow-up period of 22.5 months.

Conclusion

Conversion to an open procedure during laparoscopic rectal resection correlates with an increased postoperative morbidity, however, without impairment of the short-term oncological outcome. The conversion rate is minimized by the growing experience of the operating surgeon and, therefore, is a marker of the learning curve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis P et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13:413–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bärlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S, Schicke B (2005) Aktueller Stand der laparoskopischen Rektumresektion beim Karzinom. Chir Gastroenterol 21:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennet CL, Stryker SJ, Rosario Ferreira M, Adams J, Beart RW (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 132:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Couderc P, Rullier A, Saric J (2003) Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 5:451–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Casillas S, Delaney C, Senagore A, Brady K, Fazio V (2004) Does conversion of laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1680–1685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M, Secic M, Efron J, Belin B, Jain A, Wexner S (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 15:827–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSIC trail): multicentre, randomized controlled trail. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE, Duthie GS, Lee PWR, Monson JT (2001) Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 44:315–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Köckerling F, Reymond MA, Schneider C, Wittekind CH, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Köhler L, Bärlehner E, Kuthe A, Bruch H-P, Hohenberger W (1998) Prospective multicenter study of the quality of oncologic resections in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 41:963–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasa JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Larach SW, Patankar SK, Ferrara A et al (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs. later experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40:592–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, Smith M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2:281–289

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leung KI, Kwok SPY, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, Lai PBS (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: Prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44:207–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15:116–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC, Burpee S, Bendavid Y, Klein L, Gregoire R, Schlachta CM (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer. Does conversion affect survival. Surg Endosc 18:732–735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, Salval M, Brachet Contul R, Garrone C (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. A consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237:335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T et al (2002) Is obesity a high-risk-factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 16:855–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ptok H, Steinert N, Meyer F, Kröll KP, Scheele C, Köckerling F, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2006) Operative Behandlung von Rektumkarzinomen im Vergleich, onkologische Langzeitergebnisse einer multizentrischen Beobachtungsstudie nach laparoskopisch-assistierter, konvertierter und primär offener Operation. Chirurg 77:709–717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu MC, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Bruch H-P (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do predictive factors exist. Surg Endosc 13:151–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Slim K, Pezet D, Riff Y, Clark E, Chipponi J (1995) High morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 82:1406–1408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C, Fazio V (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Annals of Surg 242(1):83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. The colon cancer laparoscopic or open resection study group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomized trail. Lancet Oncol DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70-221-7

  26. Wittekind C, Meyer HJ, Bootz F (2003) UICC: TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren, 6th edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 66–70

  27. Yong L, Deane M, Monson JR et al (2001) Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy. Surg Endosc 15:1431–1439

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universität Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany

    A. Agha, I. Iesalnieks, S. Fichtner-Feigl, N. Ghali, P. Piso & H. J. Schlitt

  2. Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053, Regensburg, Germany

    A. Fürst

  3. Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum St. Elisabeth Straubing, St. Elisabeth Str. 23, 94315, Straubing, Germany

    D. Krenz

  4. Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Klinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany

    M. Anthuber

  5. Chirurgischen Klinik und Poliklinik, LMU Klinikum Großhadern, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany

    K. W. Jauch

Authors
  1. A. Agha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Fürst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. I. Iesalnieks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Fichtner-Feigl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. Ghali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Krenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Anthuber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. K. W. Jauch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. P. Piso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. H. J. Schlitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Fichtner-Feigl.

Additional information

Authors A. Agha and A. Fürst contributed equally

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agha, A., Fürst, A., Iesalnieks, I. et al. Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 23, 409–417 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0425-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0425-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation