Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized controlled trial comparing simultaneous intra-operative vs sequential prophylactic ureteric catheter insertion in re-operative and complicated colorectal surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Prophylactic insertion of ureteric stents aids intra-operative identification of ureters and may allow easier visualization of any direct ureteric injury. Traditionally, ureteric catheters are inserted sequentially, before starting the abdominal part of the operation. This study determines the safety and efficacy of simultaneous intra-operative ureteric catheter insertion during complicated and re-operative colorectal surgery.

Materials and methods

After institutional review board (IRB) approval, 24 patients were randomized into two groups, sequential (SEQ) and simultaneous (SIM) depending upon the timing of stent placement relative to abdominal incision. Time taken from induction to abdominal incision (AIT), induction to peritoneal entry (PET), catheter insertion time (CIT), and urinary tract infection rates were recorded. Degree of difficulty for stent insertion was graded on a scale of 1–10.

Result

Demographics were similar between groups. Mean AIT (22 ± 4 vs 41 ± 7; p = 0.0001) and mean PET (26 ± 4.2 vs 44 ± 7.6; p = 0.0001) were shorter in the SIM group. There was no significant difference in mean CIT in SIM and SEQ groups (17.9 ± 4.9 vs 17.6 ± 5.9 min, p = 0.8). The stents were unsuccessful bilaterally in one patient in the SEQ group and unilaterally in two other patients, one in each group. The median difficulty score for catheter insertion was 3 (1–10) and 2 (1–10), (p = 0.12), respectively, in SIM and SEQ groups. There were no ureteric injuries in either group. One patient in SIM developed a urinary tract infection.

Conclusion

Simultaneous ureteric catheter insertion during abdominal procedures reduces operating times without a significant increase in morbidity. Furthermore, this permits a policy of selective stent insertion as required by the intra-abdominal findings after laparotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bothwell WN, Bleicher RJ, Dent TL (1994) Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in colon surgery. A five-year review. Dis Colon Rectum 37:330–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuno K, Menzin A, Kauder HH, Sison C, Gal D (1998) Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in gynecologic surgery. Urology 52:1004–1008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kyzer S, Gordon PH (1994) The prophylactic use of ureteral catheters during colorectal operations. Am Surg 60:212–216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leff EI, Groff W, Rubin RJ, Eisenstat TE, Salvati EP (1982) Use of ureteral catheters in colonic and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 25:457–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nam YS, Wexner SD (2002) Clinical value of prophylactic ureteral stent indwelling during laparoscopic colorectal surgery. J Korean Med Sci 17:633–635

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Phipps JH, Tyrrell NJ (1992) Transilluminating ureteric stents for preventing operative ureteric damage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99:81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fry DE, Milholen L, Harbrecht PJ (1983) Iatrogenic ureteral injury. Options in management. Arch Surg 118:454–457

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheikh FA, Khubchandani IT (1990) Prophylactic ureteric catheters in colon surgery—how safe are they? Report of three cases. Dis Colon Rectum 33:508–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wood EC, Maher P, Pelosi MA (1996) Routine use of ureteric catheters at laparoscopic hysterectomy may cause unnecessary complications. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3:393–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (2003) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig 7:2–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersson A, Bergdahl L (1976) Urologic complications following abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Arch Surg 111:969–971

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Graham JW, Goligher JC (1954) The management of accidental injuries and deliberate resections of the ureter during excision of the rectum. Br J Surg 42:151–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kramhoft J, Kronborg O, Backer OG, Sprechler M (1975) Urologic complications after operations for anorectal cancer, with an evaluation of preoperative intravenous pyelography. Dis Colon Rectum 18:118–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tank ES, Ernst CB, Woolson ST, Lapides J (1972) Urinary tract complications of anorectal surgery. Am J Surg 123:118–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ward JN, Nay HR (1972) Immediate and delayed urologic complications associated with abdominoperineal resection. Am J Surg 123:642–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Watters GR, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Maher PW, Pheils MT (1983) Urological complications following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum for carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg 53:445–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dowling RA, Corriere JN Jr, Sandler CM (1986) Iatrogenic ureteral injury. J Urol 135:912–915

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Neuman M, Eidelman A, Langer R, Golan A, Bukovsky I, Caspi E (1991) Iatrogenic injuries to the ureter during gynecologic and obstetric operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 173:268–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Carlton CE (1977) Injuries of the ureter. Urol Clin North Am 4:33–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ihse I, Arnesjo B, Jonsson G (1975) Surgical injuries of the ureter. A review of 42 cases. Scand J Urol Nephrol 9:39–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zinman LM, Libertino JA, Roth RA (1978) Management of operative ureteral injury. Urology 12:290–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shingleton HM (1984) Repairing injuries to the urinary tract: update on general surgery. Contemp Obstet Gynecol 23:76–90

    Google Scholar 

  23. Buchsbaum HJ, Schmidt JD (1978) The urinary tract in clinical and surgical gynaecology and obstetrics. Gynecologic and obstetric urology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 91–95

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parker RM, Basch RI, Harrison JH (1968) Unilateral vasoconstrictive anuria. Surg Gynecol Obstet 127:66–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saltzman B (1988) Ureteral stents. Indications, variations, and complications. Urol Clin North Am 15:481–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Westenfelder M, Rosset K, Pelz K (1987) Development of nosocomial and iatrogenic urinary tract infections (UTI) following urological interventions. A prospective clinical study. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 104:59–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conor P. Delaney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pokala, N., Delaney, C.P., Kiran, R.P. et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing simultaneous intra-operative vs sequential prophylactic ureteric catheter insertion in re-operative and complicated colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 22, 683–687 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0219-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0219-1

Keywords

Navigation