Abstract
Background
The preoperative diagnosis of adult intussusceptions (AIs) remains difficult, and the assessment of the radiological methods has been evaluated very little in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of the different imaging modalities for the preoperative diagnosis of AI and describe causes of AI.
Patients and methods
Consecutive patients of 15 years and older with the postoperative diagnosis of intussusception from 1979 to 2004 were reviewed retrospectively for this multicentric study. Data concerning clinical considerations, morphological examinations, surgical procedure, histological conclusions, mortality rate and recurrence were analysed.
Results
Forty-four patients with documented intussusception were included. The mean age was 51 years (15–93 years). The preoperative diagnosis of intussusception was made in 52% of the cases. The sensitivities of the different radiological methods were abdominal ultrasounds (35%), upper gastrointestinal barium study (33%), abdominal computed tomography (CT) (58%) and barium enema (73%). An organic lesion was identified in 95% of the cases. There was 29 enteric and 15 colonic (including appendicular) intussusceptions. Thirty-seven percent of the enteric lesions were malignant, and a bit less than 50% of them were metastatic melanomas. The benign enteric lesions were Meckel’s diverticulum and Peutz–Jeghers syndrome in half of the cases. Fifty-eight percent of the pure colonic lesions (excluding appendix) were malignant, and 85% of them were primary adenocarcinomas. The benign colonic lesions were lipomas in 80% of the cases. All patients, except one, had a surgical treatment, and 13 of them had a complete reduction of the intussusception before resection. The mortality rate was 16% and recurrence occurred in three patients; two of them had a Peutz–Jeghers syndrome.
Conclusion
Intussusception rarely occurs in adults, but nearly half of their causes are malignant. The CT scan is a helpful examination for enteric intussusceptions whether barium enema seems to be the most performing method for colonic lesions. Surgery is the recommended treatment, with or without a primary reduction of the intussusception. During the surgical procedure, this reduction can lead to a more limited bowel resection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AI:
-
Adult intussusception
- CT scan:
-
computed tomography scanning
References
Azar T, Berger D (1997) Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 226(2):134–138
Nagorney DM, Sarr MG, McIlrath DC (1981) Surgical management of intussusception in the adult. Ann Surg 193:230–236
Haas EM, Etter EL, Ellis S, Taylor TV (2003) Adult intussusception. Am J Surg 186:75–76
Eisen LK, Cunningham JD, Aufses AH (1999) Intussusception in adults: institutional review. J Am Coll Surg 188:390–395
Lvoff N, Breiman RS, Coakley FV, Lu Y, Warren RS (2003) Distinguishing features of self-limiting adult small-bowel intussusception identified at CT. Radiology 227:68–72
Bruel JM, Gallix B, Achard C, Pierredon MA, Molina E (2003) Multidetector CT and MRI in diseases of the GI tract. J Radiol 84:499–513
Huang BY, Warshauer DM (2003) Adult intussusception: diagnosis and clinical relevance. Radiol Clin North Am 41:1137–1151
Cherki S, Adham M, Bizollon T, Gaudin JL, Baulieux J (2002) Intussusception of the small bowel due to Peutz–Jeghers syndrome: a case report and literature review. Ann Chir 127:714–717
Kurugoglu S, Aksoy H, Kantarcy F, Cetinkaya S, Mihmanli I, Korman U (2003) Radiological work-up in Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 33:766–771
Giardiello FM, Brensinger JD, Tersmette AC, Goodman SN, Petersen GM, Offerhauss JA et al (2000) Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. Gastroenterology 119:1447–1453
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barussaud, M., Regenet, N., Briennon, X. et al. Clinical spectrum and surgical approach of adult intussusceptions: a multicentric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 21, 834–839 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0789-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0789-3