Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective clinical and manometric study of fistulotomy with primary sphincter reconstruction in the management of recurrent complex fistula-in-ano

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

The aim of this study was to assess the results of fistulotomy with sphincter reconstruction in the management of recurrent complex fistula-in-ano in terms of recurrence and continence.

Patients and methods

Prospective study of 16 patients undergoing fistulotomy with sphincter reconstruction for recurrent complex fistula-in-ano was done. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included physical examination, anal ultrasonography and anal manometry, with a 40-month follow-up. The Wexner Continence Grading Scale (0–20) was used to assess faecal continence.

Results

Fistulas were classified as high transsphincteric in 13 patients (81.3%), suprasphincteric in 2 (12.5%) and extrasphincteric in 1 patient (6.2%). Four patients (25%) had recurred twice or more. Eight patients (50%) complained of varying degrees of prior faecal incontinence. Their mean score decreased from 8.5 to 1.875 after surgery, and all the patients improved except for one whose score remained the same. On anal manometry, the differences between continent and incontinent patients before surgery [maximum resting pressure (MRP) 86.3 vs 57.6 mmHg, maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) 196.5 vs 138.6 mmHg] decreased after surgery (MRP 81.9 vs 63.7 mmHg, MSP 179.8 vs 159.3 mmHg). In fully continent patients, both the clinical score and manometric values were quite similar after surgery. Two fully continent patients (25%) developed occasional flatus incontinence and soiling, scoring two and three points, respectively. One patient recurred (6.25%) 6 months after surgery.

Conclusion

Fistulotomy with sphincter reconstruction seems to be an effective resource in the management of recurrent complex fistula-in-ano. It improves both anal continence and manometric values in incontinent patients without compromising them in fully continent ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J III, Hyman N, Buie WD et al (2005) The Standards Practice Task Force and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Practice. Parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 48(7):1337–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC (1994) Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37(12):1194–1197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. García-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:723–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. García-Aguilar J, Davey CS, Le CT, Lowry AC, Rothenberger DA (2000) Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 43(9):1206–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (1994) Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 81(9):1382–1385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamalainen KP, Sainio AP (1997) Cutting seton for anal fistulas: high risk of minor control defects. Dis Colon Rectum 40(12):1443–1446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Graf W, Pahlman L, Ejerblad S (1995) Functional results after seton treatment of high transsphincteric anal fistulas. Eur J Surg 161(4):289–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Isbister WH, Al Sanea N (2001) The cutting seton: an experience at King Faisal Specialist Hospital. Dis Colon Rectum 44:722–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. García-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong DW, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1998) Cutting seton versus two-stage fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistula. Br J Surg 85(2):243–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lunniss PJ, Phillips RKS (2000) Anal fistula: evaluation and management. In: Phillips RKS (ed) Colorectal surgery. W B Saunders, London, pp 261–288

    Google Scholar 

  12. Athanasiadis S, Köhler A, Nafe M (1994) Treatment of high anal fistulae by primary occlusion of the internal ostium, drainage of the intersphincteric space and mucosal advancement flap. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:153–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mizhari N, Wexner SD, Zmora O, Da Silva G, Efron J, Wiess EG, Vernava AM III, Nogueras JJ (2002) Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45(12):1616–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sentovich SM (2003) Fibrin glue for anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):498–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zmora O, Mizrahi N, Rotholtz N, Pikarsky AJ, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2003) Fibrin glue sealing in the treatment of perineal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 46(5):584–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buchanan GN, Owen HA, Torkington J, Lunnis PJ, Nicholls RJ, Cohen CR (2004) Long term outcome following loose-seton technique for external sphincter preservation in complex anal fistula. Br J Surg 91(4):476–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG (1991) The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum 34:22–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Christiansen J, Rønholt C (1995) Treatment of recurrent high anal fistula by total excision and primary sphincter reconstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis 10(4):207–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lux N, Athanasiadis S (1991) Functional results following fistulectomy with primary muscle suture in high anal fistula. A prospective clinical and manometric study. Chirurg 62(1):36–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parkash S, Lakshmiratan V, Gajendran V (1985) Fistula-in-ano: treatment by fistulectomy, primary closure and reconstitution. Aust NZ J Surg 55:23–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewis A (1996) Core out. In: Phillips RKS, Lunniss PJ (eds) Anal fistula. Surgical evaluation and management. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 81–86

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roig JV, Garcia-Armengol J, Jordán J, Alos R, Solana A (1999) Immediate reconstruction of the anal sphincter after fistulectomy in the management of complex anal fistulas. Colorectal Dis 1:137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Perez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perez, F., Arroyo, A., Serrano, P. et al. Prospective clinical and manometric study of fistulotomy with primary sphincter reconstruction in the management of recurrent complex fistula-in-ano. Int J Colorectal Dis 21, 522–526 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0045-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0045-x

Keywords

Navigation