Skip to main content
Log in

Gastrostomy insertion in the 21st century: PEG or laparoscopic? Report from a large single-centre series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy (LAG) has superseded percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) based on the clinical outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective study was undertaken for the period January 06–December 09. Demographic and clinical outcomes were recorded and the two groups were compared.

Results

164 patients were studied (PEG, n = 107; LAG, n = 57). 93.5 % of PEG patients required two general anaesthetics compared with 8 % of LAG patients. Median time to using the gastrostomy was 24 (range 0–168) h in PEG and 0 (0–96) h in LAG patients (p < 0.001). Major complications occurred in 15/107 (14 %) of PEG and 2/57 (3.5 %) of LAG patients (p = 0.05). Re-operation rate following complications was 18/107 (16.8 %) for PEG and 3/57 (5.2 %) for LAG (p = 0.05). Minor complications arose in 41/107 (38 %) of PEG and 32/57 (56 %) of LAG (p = 0.05). Post-operative hospital stay was 2 (1–40) days for PEG and 2 (0–20) days for LAG (p = 0.01). The day-case rate was 0/107 for PEG and 5/57 (9 %) for LAG. There was no gastrostomy-related mortality in the series.

Conclusion

LAG requires fewer anaesthetics, is associated with shorter time to feeding, shortened hospital stay and has a reduced risk of major complications. LAG is a very good alternative to the PEG in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr (1980) Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg Dec 15:872–875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vervloessem D, van Leersum F, Boer D et al (2009) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children is not a minor procedure: risk factors for major complications. Sem Pediatr Surg 18:93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Patwardhan N, McHugh K, Drake D et al (2004) Gastroenteric fistula complicating percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. J Pediatr Surg 39:561–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang PF, Ni YH, Chang MH (2003) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy to set up a long-term enteral feeding route in children: an encouraging result. Pediatr Surg Int 19:283–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sathesh-Kumar T, Rollins H, Cheslyn-Curtis S (2009) General paediatric surgical provision of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a district general hospital—a 12-year experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91:404–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Akay B, Capizzani TR, Lee AM et al (2010) Gastrostomy tube placement in infants and children: is there a preferred technique? J Pediatr Surg 45:1147–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rothenberg SS, Bealer JF, Chang JH (1999) Primary laparoscopic placement of gastrostomy buttons for feeding tubes. A safer and simpler technique. Surg Endosc 13:995–997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lantz M, Hultin Larsson H, Arnbjörnsson E (2010) Literature review comparing laparoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies in a pediatric population Int J Pediatr (507616) 1687–9740;1687–9759. Epub

  9. Jones VS, La Hei ER, Shun A (2007) Laparoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 23:1085–1089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zamakhshary M, Jamal M, Blair GK et al (2005) Laparoscopic vs percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion: a new pediatric gold standard? J Pediatr Surg 40:859–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nah SA, Narayanaswamy B, Eaton S et al (2010) Gastrostomy insertion in children: percutaneous endoscopic or percutaneous image-guided? J Pediatr Surg 45:1153–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park JH, Rhie S, Jeong SJ (2011) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children. Korean J Pediatr 54:17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Calleja Aguayo E, Delgado Alvira R, Elías Pollina J et al (2010) The PEG: why wait? Circ Pediatr 23:24–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi T, Okazaki T, Kato Y et al (2008) Laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Asian J Surg 31:204–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smitherman S, Pimpalwar A (2009) Laparoendoscopic gastrostomy tube placement: our all-in-one technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 19:119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Croshaw RL, Nottingham JM (2006) Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: its role in providing enteric access when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is not possible. Am Surg Dec 72(12):1222–1224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Clare Wragg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wragg, R.C., Salminen, H., Pachl, M. et al. Gastrostomy insertion in the 21st century: PEG or laparoscopic? Report from a large single-centre series. Pediatr Surg Int 28, 443–448 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3079-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3079-5

Keywords

Navigation