Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Informative value of histological assessment of tissue acquired during aquablation of the prostate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the histological validity of the tissue acquired during aquablation of the prostate.

Patients and methods

Prostatic tissue of 12 patients that consecutively underwent aquablation for benign prostatic enlargement was systematically examined. Histological examination was performed by two experienced uropathologists using a digital slide scanner and slide viewer software (Pannoramic 250 and Case Viewer 2.3, 3D Histech, Hungary). The surface areas of the assessable glands were examined and set in relation to the total surface area of the material available for histology and to the patient’s total prostate volume. Examinations were performed analogously in ten consecutive patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to facilitate interpretation of the results. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

A median of 4.06% (range 1.43–7.5%) of the preoperative total prostate volume (median 64.5 ml (range 40–80 ml)) was obtained for histological examination by aquablation. Due to severe mechanical destruction and fragmentation, only a proportion of 0.43% (0.06–1.79%) of this tissue represented histologically assessable glands. Therefore, roughly 0.017% of the total prostatic volume was available for a reliable histological examination. In comparison, 32.5% (6.67–37.5%) of the total prostate volume was removed by TURP and 22.86% (7.45–40.57%) of this tissue represented informative prostatic glands, corresponding to 7.43% of the total prostate volume.

Conclusion

Histological significance of the tissue obtained by aquablation of the prostate is very limited. Costs and effort of the histological examination must, therefore, be weighed critically against the limited informative value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Desai M, Bidair M, Bhojani N, Trainer A, Arther A, Kramolowsky E, Doumanian L, Elterman D, Kaufman RP Jr, Lingeman J, Krambeck A, Eure G, Badlani G, Plante M, Uchio E, Gin G, Goldenberg L, Paterson R, So A, Humphreys M, Roehrborn C, Kaplan S, Motola J, Zorn KC (2019) WATER II (80–150 mL) procedural outcomes. BJU Int 123(1):106–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP Jr, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C (2018) WATER: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of aquablation((R)) vs transurethral resection of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 199(5):1252–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Foster HE, Dahm P, Kohler TS, Lerner LB, Parsons JK, Wilt TJ, McVary KT (2019) Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA guideline amendment 2019. J Urol 202(3):592–598. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gravas S, Cornu, J.N., Gacci, M. et al. (2020) 2020 European Guidelines of the „Management of Non-neurogenic Male LUTS“. Publisher: EAU Guidelines Office. Place published: Arnhem, The Netherlands. https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/#1_3. Accessed 10 June 2020

  5. Gilling P, Anderson P, Tan A (2017) Aquablation of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 1-year results. J Urol 197(6):1565–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilling P, Reuther R, Kahokehr A, Fraundorfer M (2016) Aquablation—image-guided robot-assisted waterjet ablation of the prostate: initial clinical experience. BJU Int 117(6):923–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yassaie O, Silverman JA, Gilling PJ (2017) Aquablation of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: early results. Curr Urol Rep 18(12):91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0743-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zigeuner R, Schips L, Lipsky K, Auprich M, Salfellner M, Rehak P, Pummer K, Hubmer G (2003) Detection of prostate cancer by TURP or open surgery in patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsies. Urology 62(5):883–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00663-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Biers SM, Oliver HC, King AJ, Adamson AS (2009) Does laser ablation prostatectomy lead to oncological compromise? BJU Int 103(4):454–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08039.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carmignani L, Macchi A, Ratti D, Finkelberg E, Casellato S, Bozzini G, Maruccia S, Marenghi C, Picozzi S (2015) Are histological findings of thulium laser vapo-enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate comparable? Pathol Oncol Res 21(4):1071–1075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-015-9931-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nafie S, Dormer J, Khan MA (2017) The significance of histological analysis following laser transurethral resection of the prostate. Int Urol Nephrol 49(8):1343–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1617-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Naspro R, Freschi M, Salonia A, Guazzoni G, Girolamo V, Colombo R, Scattoni V, Rigatti P, Montorsi F (2004) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate. Are histological findings comparable? J Urol 171(3):1203–1206. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000099162.12144.8f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abedi AR, Ghiasy S, Fallah-Karkan M, Rahavian A, Allameh F (2020) The management of patients diagnosed with incidental prostate cancer: narrative review. Res Rep Urol 12:105–109. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S245669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Herlemann A, Wegner K, Roosen A, Buchner A, Weinhold P, Bachmann A, Stief CG, Gratzke C, Magistro G (2017) "Finding the needle in a haystack": oncologic evaluation of patients treated for LUTS with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). World J Urol 35(11):1777–1782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2048-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Porcaro AB, Tafuri A, Inverardi D, Amigoni N, Sebben M, Pirozzi M, Processali T, Rizzetto R, Shakir A, Cerrato C, Tiso L, Panunzio A, De Michele M, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Artibani W (2020) Incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate: analysis of incidence and risk factors in 458 patients. Minerva Urol Nefrol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03564-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenhammer B, Lausenmeyer EM, Mayr R, Burger M, Eichelberg C (2018) HoLEP provides a higher prostate cancer detection rate compared to bipolar TURP: a matched-pair analysis. World J Urol 36(12):2035–2041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2353-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no commercial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Protocol/project development: GM, AET, and DA. Data collection or management: GM, AET, KH, and DA. Data analysis: GM, AET, LB, and DA. Manuscript writing/editing: GM, AET, and DA. Critical revision of the manuscript: HPS, LB, and MP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gautier Müllhaupt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

GM: Sub-investigator in several studies on Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) and iTIND®. AET: no disclosures. LB: no disclosures. MP: no disclosures. KH: no disclosures. DA: research support (institutional) by Boston Scientific and Olympus. Principle investigator and sub-investigator in several studies on Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) and iTIND®. HPS: Sub-investigator in several studies on Prostatic artery embolization (PAE).

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All patients provided written informed consent for data use.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Müllhaupt, G., Enzler-Tschudy, A., Horg, K. et al. Informative value of histological assessment of tissue acquired during aquablation of the prostate. World J Urol 39, 2043–2047 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03426-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03426-2

Keywords

Navigation