Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the learning curve for Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) using a mentor-based approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate the learning curve of Thulium:YAG VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) for patients with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) prospectively.

Methods

ThuVEP was performed using the 120 Watt 2 μm continuous wave Thulium:YAG laser. ThuVEP was done by a resident without experience in transurethral prostate surgery (A, n = 32), an experienced endourologist (B, n = 32), and an experienced surgeon in ThuVEP (C, n = 32), who served as the mentor for A/B. Patients were divided into consecutive subgroups of 8 patients to assess the impact of the learning curve on procedure outcome. Patient demographic, perioperative, and 12-month follow-up data were analysed.

Results

ThuVEP was successfully completed in all patients. Enucleation efficiency (g/min) differed significantly between surgeon A (0.48 ± 0.3), B (0.7 ± 0.36), and C (1.4 ± 0.67) (p ≤ 0.001). Enucleation efficiency correlated significantly with the weight of resected tissue in surgeon A (r = 0.88), B (r = 0.73), and C (r = 0.79) (p < 0.001). ThuVEP was performed by surgeon A and B with reasonable enucleation, morcellation, and overall operation efficiency after 8–16 procedures. At 12-month follow-up, 68 (71 %) patients were available for review. IPSS, QoL, Qmax, PVR, PSA, and prostate volume improved significantly at follow-up (p ≤ 0.023). Mean PSA/prostate volume reduction was 81.95/74.5, 80.7/79.4, and 87.6/75.9 % in surgeon A, B, and C, respectively. Urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture developed 2 (A = 1, B = 1; 2.1 %) patients and 1 (C, 1 %) patient each, respectively.

Conclusions

ThuVEP can be performed with reasonable efficiency even during the initial learning course of the surgeon when closely mentored. Previous experience in the field of endourology is beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 g: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 53:160–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A, Scattoni V, Guazzoni G, Colombo R, Cestari A, Briganti A, Mazzoccoli B, Rigatti P, Montorsi F (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol 50:563–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, Speakman MJ, Stief CG (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58:384–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Naspro R, Bachmann A, Gilling P, Kuntz R, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, Reich O, Stief C, Vavassori I (2009) A review of recent evidence (2006–2008) for 532-nm photoselective laser vaporisation and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol 55:1345–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moody JA, Lingeman JE (2001) Holmium laser enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 g.: comparison to open prostatectomy. J Urol 165:459–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K (2002) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transvesical open enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 g.: a randomized prospective trial of 120 patients. J Urol 168:1465–1469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Hakim A, Elhilali MM (2002) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate can be taught: the first learning experience. BJU Int 90:863–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Sodha HS, Hegde S, Mohile PD, Bansal MB (2007) Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol 177:1468–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bach T, Wendt-Nordahl G, Michel MS, Herrmann TRW, Gross AJ (2009) Feasibility and efficacy of Thulium:YAG laser enucleation (VapoEnucleation) of the prostate. World J Urol 27:541–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bach T, Netsch C, Haecker A, Michel MS, Herrmann TR, Gross AJ (2010) Thulium:YAG laser enucleation (VapoEnucleation) of the prostate: safety and durability during intermediate-term follow-up. World J Urol 28:39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilling P (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int 101:131–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bach T, Huck N, Wezel F, Häcker A, Gross AJ, Michel MS (2010) 70 versus 120 W thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet 2 microm continuous-wave laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic ex vivo evaluation. BJU Int 106:368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Kuo RL, Watkins SL, Lingeman JE (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates of >125 ml. BJU Int 97:81–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterson MD, Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Kuo RL, Soergel TM, Watkins SL, Lingeman JE (2005) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for men with urinary retention. J Urol 174:998–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo RL, Kim SC, Lingeman JE, Paterson RF, Watkins SL, Simmons GR, Steele RE (2003) Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP): the Methodist Hospital experience with greater than 75 g enucleations. J Urol 170:149–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seki N, Mocida O, Kinukawa N, Sagiyama K, Nato S (2003) Holmium laser enucleation for prostatic adenoma: analysis of learning curve over the curse of 70 consecutive cases. J Urol 170:1847–1850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Placer J, Gelabert-Mas A, Vallmanya F, Manresa JM, Mene´ndez V, Cortadellas R, Arango O (2009) Holmium laser enucleation of prostate: outcome and complications of self-taught learning curve. Urology 73:1042–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Du C, Jin X, Bai F, Qiu Y (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: the safety, efficacy, and learning experience in China. J Endourol 22:1031–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bach T, Herrmann TR, Ganzer R, Burchardt M, Gross AJ (2007) RevoLix vaporesection of the prostate: initial results of 54 patients with a 1-year follow-up. World J Urol 25:257–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xia SJ, Zhuo J, Sun XW, Han BM, Shao Y, Zhang YN (2008) Thulium laser versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Eur Urol 53:382–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fu WJ, Zhang X, Yang Y, Hong BF, Gao JP, Cai W, Zhang P, Wang XX (2010) Comparison of 2-microm continuous wave laser vaporesection of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective nonrandomized trial with 1-year follow-up. Urology 75:194–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Hegde SS, Bansal MB (2007) Peri-operative complications of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: experience in the first 280 patients, and a review of literature. BJU Int 100:94–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Aho TF, Gilling PJ, Kennett KM, Westenberg AM, Fraundorfer MR, Frampton CM (2005) Holmium laser bladder neck incision versus holmium enucleation of the prostate as outpatient procedures for prostates less than 40 g: a randomized trial. J Urol 174:210–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Rübenkamp 220, 22291, Hamburg, Germany

    C. Netsch, T. Bach, O. Neubauer & A. J. Gross

  2. Department of Urology, MHH Medical School of Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    T. R. W. Herrmann

Authors
  1. C. Netsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Bach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. R. W. Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. O. Neubauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. J. Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Netsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Netsch, C., Bach, T., Herrmann, T.R.W. et al. Evaluation of the learning curve for Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) using a mentor-based approach. World J Urol 31, 1231–1238 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0894-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0894-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation