Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the role of lasers that allow acute removal of obstructing tissue in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A MEDLINE search over the last 6 years focused on randomized trials, large case series and review articles. A total of more than 4,000 patients were analyzed with respect to the morbidity and outcome, and the advantages and disadvantages of the various lasers. Laser treatment of BPH has evolved from coagulation to enucleation. Blood loss is significantly reduced as compared to transurethral resection and open prostatectomy. Ablative/vaporizing techniques have recently become popular again with the marketing of new high-powered 80 W potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) and 100 W holmium lasers. Vaporization immediately removes obstructing tissue, but tissue specimen cannot be obtained. KTP short-term results are promising, but long-term results and randomized trials are lacking. Postoperative volume reduction is less than with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and the KTP laser can be used for BPH treatment only. HoLEP allows whole lobes of the prostate to be removed. Prostates of all sizes can be operated on. It is at least as safe and effective as TURP and open prostatectomy, with significantly lower morbidity, as shown by several well-designed randomized clinical trials. It provides specimen for histological evaluation. In addition, the holmium laser can be used for the endourological treatment of stones, strictures and tumors. HoLEP appears to be a size-independent new “gold standard” in the surgical treatment of BPH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muschter R (2003) Free-beam and contact laser coagulation. J Endourol 17:579–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Laguna MP, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette JJMCH (2003) Interstitial laser coagulation treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: is it to be recommended? J Endourol 17:595–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuntz RM (2006) Current role of lasers in treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Eur Urol 49:961–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilling PJ, Mackey M, Cresswell M, Kennett K, Kabalin JN, Fraundorfer MR (1999) Holmium laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial with 1-year follow up. J Urol 162:1640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Westenberg A, Gilling P, Kennett K, Frampton C, Fraundorfer M (2004) Holmium laser resection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 4-year minimum long-term follow up. J Urol 172:616–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mottet N, Anidjar M, Bourdon O, Louis JF, Teillac P, Costa P, Le Duc A (1999) Randomized comparison of transurethral electroresection and holmium:YAG laser vaporization for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 13:127–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan AHH, Gilling PJ, Kennett KM, Frampton C, Westenberg AM, Fraundorfer MR (2003) A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands (40 to 200 grams). J Urol 170:1270–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Montorsi F, Naspro R, Suardi N, Colombo R, Salonia A, Cestari A, Guazzoni G, Digirolamo V, Rigatti P (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 2-year follow-up. Eur Urol Suppl 5(2):234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuntz RM, Ahyai S, Lehrich K, Fayad A (2004) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients. J Urol 172:1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai S (2004) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate compared with transvesical open prostatectomy: 18-months-follow-up of a randomized study. J Endourol 18:189–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouchier-Hayes DM, Anderson P, van Appledorn S, Bugeja P, Costello AJ (2006) A randomized trial comparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in treatment of LUTS. J Urol Suppl 175:463

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon S, Watson G (2006) Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate. Eur Urol Suppl 5(2):310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moody J, Lingeman JE (2001) Holmium laser enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm: comparison to open prostatectomy. J Urol 165:459–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Straumann U, Wyler S, Schürch L, Forster T, Reich O, Lehmann K, Sulser T (2006) Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Eur Urol Suppl 5(2):236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park J, Song SH, Lee SB, Hong B, Ahu TY (2006) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy: comparison of short-term treatment outcomes with TURP. Eur Urol Suppl 5(2):235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson LC, Gilling PJ (2005) From coagulation to enucleation: the use of lasers in surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nature Clin Pract Urol 2:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mc Allister WJ, Gilling PJ (2004) Vaporization of the prostate. Curr Opin Urol 14:31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tooher R, Sutherland P, Costello A, Gilling P, Rees G, Maddern G (2004) A systematic review of holmium laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 171:1779–1791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Te AE (2004) The development of laser prostatectomy. BJU Int 93:262–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reich O, Bachmann A, Schneede P, Zaak D, Sulser T, Hofstetter A (2004) Experimental comparison of high power (80 W) potassium titanyl phosphate laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 171:2502–2504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruszat R, Bachman A, Wyler S, Seifert HH, Forster T, Reich O, Sulser T (2006) Photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP): functional outcome and adverse events after 285 procedures. Eur Urol Suppl 5(2):233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reddy B, Gouzales RR, Sandhu JS, Kaplan SA, Te AE (2005) KTP photoselective vaporization of the prostate: New York Presbyterian–Cornell experience. SIU meeting on prostate disease, Bariloche Argentinia, 29.9-1.10.2005

  23. Malloy T, Sandhu J, Smith A, Reddy B, Harryhill J, Kaplan S, Te A (2005) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in anticoagulated patients: a multicenter retrospective evaluation of feasibility. J Urol Suppl 173:423

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sandhu JS, Ng C, Vanderbrink BA, Egan C, Kaplan SA, Te AE (2004) High-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate photoselective laser vaporization of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with large prostates. Urology 64:1155–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Te AE, Malloy TR, Stein BS, Ulchaker JC, Nseyo UO, Hai MA, Malek RS (2004) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month results from the first United States multicenter prospective trial. J Urol 172:1404–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruszat R, Sulser T, Wyler S, Forster T, Bachmann A, Leippold T (2006) Transurethrale Prostatektomie bei über 80 Jährigen—Ist die photoselektive Vaporisation der Prostata eine sichere Alternative? Urologie 45(Suppl 1):113

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yakupogly YK, Donmezer S, Mestci B, Saglam R, Simsek ÜS (2006) Successful treatment of BPH over 100 ml with KTP laser. J Urol Suppl 175:491

    Google Scholar 

  28. Te AE (2006) The next generation in laser treatments and the role of the greenlight high-performance system laser. Rev Urol Suppl 8:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gilling PJ, Fraundorfer MR (1998) Holmium laser prostatectomy: a technique in evolution. Curr Opin Urol 8:11–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tan AAH, Gilling PJ, Kennett KM, Fletcher H, Fraundorfer MR (2003) Long-term results of high-power holmium laser vaporization (ablation) of the prostate. BJU Int 92:707–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pedraza R, Samadi A, Eshghi M (2004) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in critically ill patients with technique modification. J Endourol 18:795–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM (2006) Experience of 603 cases treated with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol Suppl 175:490

    Google Scholar 

  33. Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): the endourological alternative to open prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49:87–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai S (2004) Does perioperative outcome of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate depend on prostate size? J Endourol 18:183–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller NL, Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Kuo RL, Watkins SL, Lingeman JE (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: effect on prostate volume. J Urol Suppl 175:490

    Google Scholar 

  36. Naspro R, Freschi M, Salonia A, Guazzoni G, di Givolamo V, Scattoni RCV, Rigatti P, Montorsi F (2004) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate. Are histological findings comparable? J Urol 171:1203–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Larner TRG, Agarwal D, Costello AJ (2003) Day-case holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for gland volumes of <60 ml: early experience. BJU Int 91:61–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuo R, Paterson R, Siqueira T, Watkins S, Simmons G, Steele R, Lingeman J (2003) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: morbidity in a series of 206 patients. Urology 62:59–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. El-Hakim A, Elhilali MM (2002) Holmium laser enucleation can be taught: the first learning experience. BJU Int 90:863–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Seki N, Mochida O, Kinukawa N, Sagiyama K, Naito S (2003) Holmium laser enucleation for prostatic adenoma: analysis of learning curve over the course of 70 consecutive cases. J Urol 170:1847–1850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kundu S, Roehl KA, Loeb ST, Gashti SN, Smith N, McVary KT, Catalona WJ (2006) Could laser vaporization of the prostate for BPH compromise prostate cancer detection? J Urol Suppl 175:462

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There are no commercial associations between the author and any company that might pose a conflict in connection with the submitted article. The work has not been funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer M. Kuntz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuntz, R.M. Laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 25, 241–247 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-007-0170-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-007-0170-y

Keywords

Navigation