Skip to main content
Log in

Liver and spleen stiffness and their ratio assessed by real-time two dimensional-shear wave elastography in patients with liver fibrosis and cirrhosis due to chronic viral hepatitis

  • Ultrasound
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the performance of real-time 2D shear wave elastography (RT 2D-SWE) for non-invasive staging of liver disease in patients with chronic viral hepatitis (CVH).

Materials and methods

Naive CVH patients underwent liver (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) measurements by an intercostal approach. Patients with ALT >3× upper limit of normal, cholestasis as revealed by dilated intrahepatic biliary tree, and liver congestion were excluded. Results were expressed in kPa and compared to histological stage (Ishak) of liver fibrosis (LF). Patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis (LC) were diagnosed using standard clinical, ultrasound, and endoscopic criteria.

Results

Of 123 patients, LS was successfully measured in 79.7 % and SS in 53.7 %. LS accurately differentiated between liver disease stages, with cut-off values of 8.1 (AUC 0.991) for F ≥ 3, 10.8 kPa (AUC 0.954) for F ≥ 5, and 27 kPa (AUC 0.961) for decompensated LC. SS was significantly different between non-cirrhotic stages (F0–4) and LC (cut-off 24 kPa; AUC 0.821). While both LS and SS increased with liver disease progression, the difference between them decreased, as reflected by the stiffness ratio index.

Conclusions

RT 2D-SWE can accurately differentiate between the stages of LF, and can distinguish LF from LC and compensated from decompensated LC.

Key Points

RT 2D-SWE is an accurate method for assessment of liver fibrosis.

RT 2D-SWE is applicable in 80 % of patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

RT 2D-SWE accurately differentiates compensated from decompensated liver cirrhosis.

Both liver and spleen stiffness increase with progression of liver fibrosis.

In cirrhosis, the difference between liver and spleen stiffness decreases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

ARFI:

Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging

AUC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

LC:

Liver cirrhosis

LF:

Liver fibrosis

LS:

Liver stiffness

LSM:

Liver stiffness measurement

SE:

Sonoelastography

SRI:

Stiffness ratio index

SS:

Spleen stiffness

SSM:

Spleen stiffness measurement

RT 2D-SWE:

Real-time wo-dimensional shear wave elastography

ULN:

Upper limit of normal

References

  1. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, Bojunga J, Correas J-M, Gilja OH et al (2013) EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med 34:238–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsochatzis E, Gurusamy K, Ntaoula S, Cholongitas E, Davidson B, Burroughs A (2011) Elastography for the diagnosis of severity of fibrosis in chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. J Hepatol 54:650–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J, Calliada F et al (2013) EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med 34:169–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bota S, Herkner H, Sporea I, Salzl P, Sirli R, Neghina AM et al (2013) Meta-analysis: ARFI elastography versus transient elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Liver Int 33:1138–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bavu E, Gennisson J-L, Couade M, Bercoff J, Mallet V, Fink M et al (2011) Noninvasive In Vivo Liver Fibrosis Evaluation Using Supersonic Shear Imaging: A Clinical Study on 113 Hepatitis C Virus Patients. Ultrasound Med Biol 37:1361–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bello B, Zicchetti M, Filice G, Filice C (2012) Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study. Hepatology 56:2125–2133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sporea I, Bota S, Jurchis A, Sirli R, Grădinaru-Tascău O, Popescu A et al (2013) Acoustic radiation force impulse and supersonic shear imaging versus transient elastography for liver fibrosis assessment. Ultrasound Med Biol 39:1933–1941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sporea I, Bota S, Gradinaru-Taşcău O, Sirli R, Popescu A, Jurchiş A (2014) Which are the cut-off values of 2D-Shear Wave Elastography (2D-SWE) liver stiffness measurements predicting different stages of liver fibrosis, considering Transient Elastography (TE) as the reference method? Eur J Radiol 83:e118–e122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cassinotto C, Lapuyade B, Mouries A, Hiriart J-B, Vergniol J, Gaye D et al (2014) Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with impulse elastography: Comparison of Supersonic Shear Imaging with ARFI and FibroScan®. J Hepatol 61:550–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng J, Liu G-J, Huang Z-P, Zheng J, Wu T, Zheng R-Q et al (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional shear wave elastography for the non-invasive staging of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: a cohort study with internal validation. Eur Radiol 24:2572–2581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Lissandrin R, Zicchetti M, Bernuzzi S, Salvaneschi L et al (2014) Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements. Eur Radiol 24:1283–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bedossa P, Carrat F (2009) Liver biopsy: the best, not the gold standard. J Hepatol 50:1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L (2006) Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol 44:217–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nishiura T, Watanabe H, Ito M, Matsuoka Y, Yano K, Daikoku M et al (2005) Ultrasound evaluation of the fibrosis stage in chronic liver disease by the simultaneous use of low and high frequency probes. Br J Radiol 78:189–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Castéra L, Foucher J, Bernard P-H, Carvalho F, Allaix D, Merrouche W et al (2010) Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology 51:828–835

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh S, Fujii LL, Murad MH, Wang Z, Asrani SK, Ehman RL et al (2013) Liver stiffness is associated with risk of decompensation, liver cancer, and death in patients with chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:1573–84–e1–2

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Standish R, Marelli L, Quaglia A, Patch D et al (2006) A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 125:710–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Callea F, De Groote J, Gudat F et al (1995) Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 22:696–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Poynard T, Bedossa P, Opolon P (1997) Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups. Lancet 349:825–832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thein H-H, Yi Q, Dore GJ, Krahn MD (2008) Estimation of stage-specific fibrosis progression rates in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Hepatology 48:418–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reed GF, Lynn F, Meade BD (2002) Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:1235–1239

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Poynard T, Munteanu M, Luckina E, Perazzo H, Ngo Y, Royer L et al (2013) Liver fibrosis evaluation using real-time shear wave elastography: applicability and diagnostic performance using methods without a gold standard. J Hepatol 58:928–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sebastiani G, Alberti A (2012) How far is noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis from replacing liver biopsy in hepatitis C? J Viral Hepat 19:18–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goodman ZD (2007) Grading and staging systems for inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 47:598–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Castera L (2012) Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C. Gastroenterology 142:1293–1302.e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosselli M, MacNaughtan J, Jalan R, Pinzani M (2013) Beyond scoring: a modern interpretation of disease progression in chronic liver disease. Gut 62:1234–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharma P, Kirnake V, Tyagi P, Bansal N, Singla V, Kumar A et al (2013) Spleen stiffness in patients with cirrhosis in predicting esophageal varices. Am J Gastroenterol 108:1101–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takuma Y, Nouso K, Morimoto Y, Tomokuni J, Sahara A, Toshikuni N et al (2013) Measurement of spleen stiffness by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging identifies cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. Gastroenterology 144:92–101.e2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen S-H, Li Y-F, Lai H-C, Kao J-T, Peng C-Y, Chuang P-H et al (2012) Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis via spleen stiffness measurement using acoustic radiation force impulse sonoelastography in patients with chronic hepatitis B or C. J Viral Hepat 19:654–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Radwan DM, AM H, AMF K (2010) Histological and Immunohistochemical Study on Rat Spleen in Experimentally Induced Liver Cirrhosis. Egypt J Histol 33:709–721

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bolognesi M, Merkel C, Sacerdoti D, Nava V, Gatta A (2002) Role of spleen enlargement in cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Dig Liver Dis 34:144–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Boris Brkljacic. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Methodology: cross-sectional observational study, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Brkljacic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grgurevic, I., Puljiz, Z., Brnic, D. et al. Liver and spleen stiffness and their ratio assessed by real-time two dimensional-shear wave elastography in patients with liver fibrosis and cirrhosis due to chronic viral hepatitis. Eur Radiol 25, 3214–3221 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3728-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3728-x

Keywords

Navigation