Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the Turkish version of the fatigue severity scale in patients with fibromyalgia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the fatigue severity scale (FSS) in fibromyalgia (FM) patients. Sixty-one FM patients and 54 healthy controls were evaluated using the Turkish version of the FSS. Reliability was investigated using test–retest reliability and internal consistency. Concurrent validity was evaluated between the FSS score and the VAS fatigue. Convergent validity was assessed by comparing the FSS score with the scores of VAS pain, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate validity. Test–retest reliability and internal consistency of the FSS were excellent in FM patients (ICC: 0.94, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient: 0.85) and in the healthy controls (ICC: 0.90, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient: 0.91). For the concurrent validity, the correlation between the FSS and VAS fatigue was very good in FM group (r: 0.63, P: 0.000) and in the healthy controls (r: 0.94, P: 0.000). For the convergent validity, correlations between the FSS and BDI, BAI, FIQ, pain intensity were moderate to good in both groups (P: 0.000). The Turkish version of the FSS has been proved to be valid and reliable to detect severity of fatigue in FM patients. We recommend the use of it in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clauw DJ (2009) Fibromyalgia: an overview. Am J Med 122:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chong Y-Y, Ng B-Y (2009) Clinical aspects and management of fibromyalgia syndrome. Ann Acad Med Singapore 38:967–973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mckay PG, Duffy T, Martin CR (2009) Are chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia the same? Implications for the provision of appropriate mental health intervention. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 16:884–894

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aaron LA, Burke MM, Buchwald D (2000) Overlapping conditions among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and temporomandibular disorder. Arch Intern Med 160:221–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jason LA, Taylor RR, Kennedy CL (2000) Chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and multiple chemical sensitivities in a community-based sample of persons with chronic fatigue syndrome-like symptoms. Psychosom Med 62:655–663

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anton HA, Miller WC, Townson AF (2008) Measuring fatigue in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehab 89:538–542

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herlofson K, Larsen JP (2002) Measuring fatigue in patients with Parkinson’s disease–the fatigue severity scale. Europ J Neurol 9:595–600

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hewlett S, Hehir M, Kirwan JR (2007) Measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of scales in use. Arth Rheum 57:429–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hjollund NH, Andersen JH, Bech P (2007) Assessment of fatigue in chronic disease:a bibliographic study of fatigue measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:12–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dittner AJ, Wesselyb SC, Brown RG (2004) The assessment of fatigue: a practical guide for clinicians and researchers. J Psychosom Res 56:157–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD (1989) The fatigue severity scale: application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol 46:1121–1123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Valko PO, Bassetti CL, Bloch KE, Held U, Baumann CR (2008) Validation of the fatigue severity scale in a Swiss cohort. Sleep 31:1601–1607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Armutlu K, Korkmaz NC, Sumbuloglu V, Akbiyik DI, Guney Z, Karabudak R (2007) The validity and reliability of the fatigue severity scale in Turkish multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Rehab Res 30:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mattsson M, Möller B, Lundberg IE, Gard G, Boström C (2008) Reliability and validity of the fatigue severity scale in Swedish for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Rheumatol 37:269–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Merkies IS, Schmitz PI, Samijn JP, van der Meche FG, van Doorn PA (1999) Fatigue in immune-mediated polyneuropathies [abstract]. Neurology 53:1648–1654

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vasconcelos OM, Prokhorenko OA, Kelley KF, Vo AH, Olsen CH, Dalakas MC, Halstead LS, Jabbari B, Campbell WW (2008) A comparison of fatigue scales in postpoliomyelitis syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehab 87:1213–1217

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kleinman L, Zodet MW, Hakim Z, Aledort J, Barker C, Chan K, Krupp L, Revicki D (2000) Psychometric evaluation of the fatigue severity scale for use in chronic hepatitis C. Qual Life Res 9:499–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Winstead-Fry P (1998) Psychometric assessment of four fatigue scales with a sample of rural cancer patients [abstract]. J Nurs Meas 6:111–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schepers VP, Visser-Meily AM, Ketelaar M, Lindeman E (2006) Poststroke fatigue: course and its relation to personal and stroke-related factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:184–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shrout PE, Fleiss J (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feise RJ, Menke JM (2001) Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine 26:78–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Lauren B. Krupp for her permission to translate the FSS into Turkish. We also thank Ibrahim Can for his excellent translation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asli Gencay-Can.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gencay-Can, A., Can, S.S. Validation of the Turkish version of the fatigue severity scale in patients with fibromyalgia. Rheumatol Int 32, 27–31 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-010-1558-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-010-1558-3

Keywords

Navigation