Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factorial validity and norm data comparison of the Short Form 12 in patients with inflammatory-rheumatic disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measuring quality of life is increasingly considered as an outcome criterion in clinical studies. In order to assess quality of life, disease specific as well as generic instruments are used. Generic instruments make it possible to compare outcomes among different indications, but for this purpose a test of the factorial validity of the method in each indication is necessary. In this study, the generic short form 12 was administered to a sample survey of 545 patients with inflammatory-rheumatic disease. Patients data from three scientific rehabilitation research projects were pooled for the analysis. First the structure was tested using confirmatory structural equation modeling. In a second step age and gender specific values were calculated and compared to norm data from the German National Health Survey 1998. The questionnaire‘s structure is acceptable and comparable to international results. Confirmatory analyses support a model allowing covariations of error terms between items of the same subdimensions. The two latent dimension are highly correlated. Crossloadings of items from different subdimension does not improve the model fit significantly. Comparisons with the German norm data shows that the patients are impaired within their physical and mental dimension of subjective health. Higher impairment is evident especially on the physical sumscale. Women show higher impairment in both scales. However no effects of age can be detected. The SF-12 could be used with trust in the study of patients with inflammatory-rheumatic diseases. But physical and mental health can not be seen as indepentently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaplan RM (2003) The significance of quality of life in health care. Qual Life Res 12(Suppl1):3–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Karlson EW, Katz JN, Liang MH (1996) Chronic rheumatic disorders. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 1029–1037

    Google Scholar 

  3. Scharloo M, Kaptein AA, Weinman J, Hazes JM, Willems LN, Bergman W (1998) Illness perceptions, coping and functioning in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and psoriasis. J Psychosom Res 44:573–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang C, Mayo NE, Fortin PR (2001) The relationship between health related quality of life and disease activity and damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 28:525–532

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellamy N (1995) WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. A user‘s guide. University of Western Ontario, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ware JE (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine 25:3130–3139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G (2001) Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum 45:384–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH (2002) The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 29:1273–1279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas KS, Muir KR, Doherty M, Jones AC, O’Reilly SC, Bassey EJ (2002) Home based exercise programme for knee pain and knee osteoarthritis: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 325:752–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fransen M, Crosbie J, Edmonds J (2001) Physical therapy is effective for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Rheumatol 28:156–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson RT, McFarlane M, Naughton MJ, Schumaker SA (1996) Conceptual issues and considerations in cross-cultural validation of generic healh-related quality of life instruments. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 605–612

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reed JP (1998) Medical outcome study short form 36: testing and cross-validation a second-order factorial structure for health system employees. Health Serv Res 33:1361–1380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brekke M, Hjortdahl P, Kvien TK (2001) Self-efficacy and health status in rheumatoid arthritis. A two-year longitudinal observational study. Rheumatology 40:387–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoll T, Kauer Y, Buchi S, Klaghofer R, Sensky T, Villiger PM (2001) Prediction of depression in systemic lupus erythematosus patients using SF-36 mental health scores. Rheumatology 40:695–698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Theiler R, Bischoff HA, Good M, Uebelhart D (2002) Rofecoxib improves quality of life in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Swiss Med Wkly 132:566–573

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Amir M, Lewin-Epstein N, Becker G, Buskila D (2002) Psychometric properties of the SF-12 (Hebrew version) in a primary care population in Israel. Med Care 40:918–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gandhi SK, Salmon JW, Zhao SZ, Lambert BL, Gore PR, Conrad K (2001) Psychometric Evaluation of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clin Ther 23:1080–1098

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkinson C, Layte R (1997) Development and testing of the UK SF-12. J Health Serv Research Polic 2:14–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Salyers MP, Bosworth HB, Swanson JW, Lamb-Pagone J, Osher FC (2000) Reliability and validity of the SF-12 Health Survey among people with severe mental illness. Med Care 38:1141–1150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurth BM, Ellert U (2002) The SF-36 questionnaire and its usefulness in population studies—Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey 1998. Soz Praventiv Med 47:266–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T, Friedenreich C (1999) Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 28:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind P (1998) Comparison of the MOS short form 12 (SF-12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Brit J Rheumatol 37:862–869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item short-form health survey–construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim L-L-Y, Fisher JD (1999) Use of the 12item short form (SF-12) health survey in an Australian heart stroke population. Qual Life Res 8:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson D, Tucker G, Chittleborough C (2002) Rethinking und rescoring the SF-12. Soz Praventiv Med 47:172–177

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ogasawara H (2003) Correlations among maximum likelihood and weighted/unweighted least square estimators in factor analysis. Behaviormetrika 30:63–86

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu L, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Meth 3:424–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struc Equa Model 6:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hurley AE, Scandura TA, Schriesheim CA, Brannick MT, Seers A, Vandenberg RJ et al (1997) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives. J Organiz Behav 18:667–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simon GE, Revicki DA, Grothaus L, von Korff M (1998) SF-36 summary scores—are physical and mental health truly distinct? Med Care 36:567–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M (2001) Do SF-36 summary component accurately summarize subscale scores? Qual Life Res 10:395–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Camacho F, Anderson RT, Bell RA, Goff DC, Duren-Winfield V, Doss DD (2002) Investigating correlates of health related quality of life in a low-income sample of patients with diabetes. Qual Life Res 11:783–796

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the “Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung”, project: Z2.2, No: 01 GC 0110: “Analyses and Utility of the Short Form 36/Short Form 12 as an Outcome Mesurement for Medical Rehabilitation”, North Germa Network for Rehabilitation Research. We thank Peter Herschbach, MD, Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine, Medical Psychology, and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich for the allocation of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute and Policlinic of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

    Carsten Maurischat & Monika Bullinger

  2. Rehabilitation Center Bad Eilsen, Bad Eilsen, Germany

    Inge Ehlebracht-König

  3. Clinic and Policlinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

    Alexander Kühn

Authors
  1. Carsten Maurischat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Inge Ehlebracht-König
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Kühn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Monika Bullinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten Maurischat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maurischat, C., Ehlebracht-König, I., Kühn, A. et al. Factorial validity and norm data comparison of the Short Form 12 in patients with inflammatory-rheumatic disease. Rheumatol Int 26, 614–621 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-005-0046-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-005-0046-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation