Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of FDG-PET/CT in detecting lymphomatous bone marrow involvement in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the role of FDG-PET/CT in detecting bone marrow (BM) involvement, pre-treatment bilateral bone marrow biopsies (BMBs) and FDG-PET/CT scans of 89 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with rituximab–CHOP were reviewed and analyzed. Fourteen patients (15.7%) had lymphomatous involvement based on BMB (BMB+), and 17 patients (19.1%) had the possibility of BM involvement on FDG-PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT+). Seventy-two patients (80.8%) had concordant results between BMB and FDG-PET/CT (seven patients were positive for both, and 65 patients were negative for both), but 17 patients (19.2%) had a discordant interpretation (seven patients were BMB+ and FDG-PET/CT−, and ten were BMB− and FDG-PET/CT+). Although BMB+ patients had an inferior 2-year EFS (37.0% vs. 79.8%, p < 0.001) and OS (36.3% vs. 81.0%, p < 0.001) compared to BMB− patients, no differences in EFS (62.6% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.185) and OS (59.4% vs. 78.0%, p = 0.146) were shown between FDG-PET/CT+ and FDG-PET/CT− patients. Whereas six of seven patients with diffuse hypermetabolism were BMB+, only one of ten patients with focal hypermetabolism was BMB+. The results suggest that FDG-PET/CT had a limited value to detect BM involvement in patients with DLBCL. Focal hypermetabolism of hematopoietic BM in FDG-PET/CT had no impact on survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carbone PP, Kaplan HS, Musshoff K, Smithers DW, Tubiana M (1971) Report of the Committee on Hodgkin’s Disease Staging Classification. Cancer Res 31(11):1860–1861

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Conlan MG, Bast M, Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD (1990) Bone marrow involvement by non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: the clinical significance of morphologic discordance between the lymph node and bone marrow. Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 8(7):1163–1172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang J, Weiss LM, Chang KL, Slovak ML, Gaal K, Forman SJ, Arber DA (2002) Diagnostic utility of bilateral bone marrow examination: significance of morphologic and ancillary technique study in malignancy. Cancer 94(5):1522–1531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hustinx R, Benard F, Alavi A (2002) Whole-body FDG-PET imaging in the management of patients with cancer. Semin Nucl Med 32(1):35–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Fisher RI, Hagenbeek A, Zucca E, Rosen ST, Stroobants S, Lister TA, Hoppe RT, Dreyling M, Tobinai K, Vose JM, Connors JM, Federico M, Diehl V (2007) Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25(5):579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elstrom R, Guan L, Baker G, Nakhoda K, Vergilio JA, Zhuang H, Pitsilos S, Bagg A, Downs L, Mehrotra A, Kim S, Alavi A, Schuster SJ (2003) Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. Blood 101(10):3875–3876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuster D, Chiang S, Andreadis C, Guan L, Zhuang H, Schuster S, Alavi A (2006) Can [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging complement biopsy results from the iliac crest for the detection of bone marrow involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma? Nucl Med Commun 27(1):11–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelosi E, Penna D, Douroukas A, Bello M, Amati A, Arena V, Passera R, Bisi G (2010) Bone marrow disease detection with FDG-PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy during the staging of malignant lymphoma: results from a large multicentre study. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

  9. Ribrag V, Vanel D, Leboulleux S, Lumbroso J, Couanet D, Bonniaud G, Auperin A, Masson F, Bosq J, Edeline V, Ferme C, Pigneur F, Schlumberger M (2008) Prospective study of bone marrow infiltration in aggressive lymphoma by three independent methods: whole-body MRI, PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy. Eur J Radiol 66(2):325–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schaefer NG, Strobel K, Taverna C, Hany TF (2007) Bone involvement in patients with lymphoma: the role of FDG-PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(1):60–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng G, Chen W, Chamroonrat W, Torigian DA, Zhuang H, Alavi A (2011) Biopsy versus FDG PET/CT in the initial evaluation of bone marrow involvement in pediatric lymphoma patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

  12. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J, Lister TA, Bloomfield CD (1999) World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting—Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997. J Clin Oncol 17(12):3835–3849

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon H, Sweets HH (1936) A simple method for the silver impregnation of reticulum. Am J Pathol 12(4):541–552

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chung R, Lai R, Wei P, Lee J, Hanson J, Belch AR, Turner AR, Reiman T (2007) Concordant but not discordant bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma predicts a poor clinical outcome independent of the International Prognostic Index. Blood 110(4):1278–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, Shipp MA, Fisher RI, Connors JM, Lister TA, Vose J, Grillo-Lopez A, Hagenbeek A, Cabanillas F, Klippensten D, Hiddemann W, Castellino R, Harris NL, Armitage JO, Carter W, Hoppe R, Canellos GP (1999) Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol 17(4):1244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Itti E, Juweid ME, Haioun C, Yeddes I, Hamza-Maaloul F, El Bez I, Evangelista E, Lin C, Dupuis J, Meignan M (2010) Improvement of early 18F-FDG PET interpretation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: importance of the reference background. J Nucl Med 51(12):1857–1862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kand PG, Tiwari BP, Basu S, Asopa RV, Nayak UN (2010) Exploring the role of FDG-PET in the assessment of bone marrow involvement in lymphoma patients as interpreted by qualitative and semiquantitative disease metabolic activity parameter. Indian J Cancer 47(4):380–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meignan M, Gallamini A, Haioun C (2009) Report on the first international workshop on interim-PET-scan in lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 50(8):1257–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moulin-Romsee G, Hindie E, Cuenca X, Brice P, Decaudin D, Benamor M, Briere J, Anitei M, Filmont JE, Sibon D, de Kerviler E, Moretti JL (2010) (18)F-FDG PET/CT bone/bone marrow findings in Hodgkin’s lymphoma may circumvent the use of bone marrow trephine biopsy at diagnosis staging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(6):1095–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pelosi E, Penna D, Deandreis D, Chiappella A, Skanjeti A, Vitolo U, Bisi G (2008) FDG-PET in the detection of bone marrow disease in Hodgkin’s disease and aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and its impact on clinical management. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 52(1):9–16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hodges GF, Lenhardt TM, Cotelingam JD (1994) Bone marrow involvement in large-cell lymphoma. Prognostic implications of discordant disease. Am J Clin Pathol 101(3):305–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sehn LH, Scott DW, Chhanabhai M, Berry B, Ruskova A, Berkahn L, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD (2011) Impact of concordant and discordant bone marrow involvement on outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R–CHOP. J Clin Oncol 29(11):1452–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Campbell J, Seymour JF, Matthews J, Wolf M, Stone J, Juneja S (2006) The prognostic impact of bone marrow involvement in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma varies according to the degree of infiltration and presence of discordant marrow involvement. Eur J Haematol 76(6):473–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Hyung Sun Kim, RN, Soo Jung Lee, RN and Hee Keun Kang, RN for their support in the clinical care of the analyzed patients.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Hoon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, J., Lee, Y., Park, Y. et al. Role of FDG-PET/CT in detecting lymphomatous bone marrow involvement in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ann Hematol 91, 687–695 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1353-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1353-6

Keywords

Navigation