Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognosis of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving either induction or noncurative treatment: a single-center retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since few studies focus on prognostic factors in unselected elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, a retrospective analysis of 138 consecutive patients aged >55 years (median age: 67, range: 56–89) with AML diagnosed at a single center over an 8-year period was performed: 69% had de novo AML and 31% secondary (s) AML; 67% of the patients were karyotyped. Of the patients, 73 (53%) were treated with standard induction therapy protocols and 65 (47%) received palliative treatment only. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the effects of the following factors on overall survival (OS) were performed: sex, age ≥ vs <65 years, de novo vs sAML, serum (s) lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ vs <400 U/l, leukocytes ≥ vs <50,000/µl, induction therapy, and karyotype. Additionally, in patients receiving induction therapy, complete remission (CR) rates and survival from CR were analyzed. CR rate was 47% [95% confidence interval (35%, 59%)], 53% (39%, 66%) in de novo AML, and 21% (5%, 51%) in sAML. After a median follow-up of 4 years, 130 deaths were observed (94%). In a univariate analysis, significant factors for longer OS were induction therapy, age <65 years, sLDH <400 U/l, and de novo AML. In a multivariate analysis, significant factors for longer OS were sLDH <400 U/l and induction therapy. However, the difference between treatment outcome may also be due to selection criteria not captured, such as performance status, comorbid conditions, wish of the patient, etc. The effects of intensive and nonintensive treatment in this patient group need to be investigated in prospective, randomized trials in which these clinical parameters of high relevance for treatment decisions in older patients are also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3A, B.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anonymous (1993) A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The International Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. N Engl J Med 329:987–994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker MA, et al. (1986) Results of chemotherapy for unselected patients with acute myeloblastic leukaemia: effect of exclusions on interpretation of results. The Toronto Leukemia Study Group. Lancet 1:786–788

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baudard M, Beauchamp-Nicoud A, Delmer A, et al. (1999) Has the prognosis of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia improved over years? A single institution experience of 784 consecutive patients over a 16-year period. Leukemia 13:1481–1490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baudard M, Marie JP, Cadiou M, Vigue F, Zittoun R (1994) Acute myelogenous leukemia in the elderly: retrospective study of 235 consecutive patients. Br J Haematol 86:82–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett CL, StinsonTJ, Tallman MS, et al. (1999) Economic analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled phase III study of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor in adult patients (55 to 70 years of age) with acute myelogenous leukemia. Ann Oncol 10:177–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. (1985) Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Intern Med 103:620–625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernstein ID (2000) Monoclonal antibodies to the myeloid stem cells: therapeutic implications of CMA-676, a humanized anti-CD33 antibody calicheamicin conjugate. Leukemia 14:474–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boogaerts MA (1998) Stem cell transplantation and intensified cytotoxic treatment for myelodysplasia. Curr Opin Hematol 5:465–471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brincker H (1985) Estimate of overall treatment results in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia based on age-specific rates of incidence and of complete remission. Cancer Treat Rep 69:5–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carella AM, Champlin R, Slavin S, McSweeney P, Storb R (2000) Mini-allografts: ongoing trials in humans. Bone Marrow Transplant 25:345–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cartwright RA Staines A (1992) Acute leukemias. Epidemiology of hematologic disease, part I. Baillieres Clin Haematol 5:1-26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Champlin RE, Ho WG, Gale RP, et al. (1985) Treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia: a prospective controlled trial of bone marrow transplantation versus consolidation chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med 102:285–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Estey EH (2000) How I treat older patients with AML. Blood 96:1670–1673

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrara F, Leoni F, Annunziata M, Copia C, Ciolli S, Mirto S (1999) Serum LDH level and karyotype enable the prediction of clinical outcome in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 94 [Suppl 1]:499a

  15. Ferrara F, Mirto S (1996) Serum LDH value as a predictor of clinical outcome in acute myelogenous leukaemia of the elderly. Br J Haematol 92:627–631

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grimwade D, Walker H, Harrison G, et al. (2001) The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. Blood 98:1312–1320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, et al. (1999) World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting—Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997. J Clin Oncol 17:3835–3849

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heil G, Chadid L, Hoelzer D, Seipelt G, Mitrou P, Huber C, et al. (1995) GM-CSF in a double-blind randomized, placebo controlled trial in therapy of adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leukemia 9:3–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heil G, Krauter J, Kirchner H, et al. (1998) Risk adapted induction and consolidation therapy including autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in adults aged up to 60 years with de novo myeloblastic leukemia. Blood 92 [Suppl 1]:230a

  20. Hiddemann W, Kern W, Schoch C, et al. (1999) Management of acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients. J Clin Oncol 17:3569–3576

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson PRE, Liu YJA (1993) Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: biology and treatment. Br J Haematol 83:1-6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Keating MJ, Smith TL, Gehan FA, et al. (1980) Factors related to length of complete remission an adult acute leukemia. Cancer 45:2017

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kosary CL, Ries LAG, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (1995) SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–1992: tables and graphs (NIH publication no 96–2789). National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

  24. Legrand O, Perrot JY, Baudard M, et al. (2000) The immunophenotype of 177 adults with acute myeloid leukemia: proposal of a prognostic score. Blood 96:870–877

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Leith CP, Kopecky KJ, Godwin J, et al. (1997) Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses to standard chemotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood 89:3323–3329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Löwenberg B, Downing JR, Burnett A (1999) Acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 341:1051–1062

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Löwenberg B, Suciu S, Archimbaud E, et al. (1998) Mitoxantrone versus daunorubicin in induction-consolidation chemotherapy—the value of low-dose cytarabine for maintenance of remission, and an assessment of prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: final report of the Leukemia Cooperative Group of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Hovon Group randomized phase III study AML-9. J Clin Oncol 16:872–881

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Löwenberg B, Zittoun R, Kerkhofs H, et al. (1989) On the value of intensive remission-induction therapy in elderly patients of 65+ years with acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized phase III study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Group. J Clin Oncol 7:1268–1274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Menzin J, Lang K, Earle CC, Kerney D, Mallick R (2002) The outcomes and costs of acute myeloid leukemia among the elderly. Arch Intern Med 162:1597–1603

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mertelsmann R, Thaler HT, To L, et al. (1980) Morphological classification, response to therapy and survival in 263 adult patients with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 56:773–781

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mitelman F (1991) Guidelines for cancer cytogenetics, supplement to an international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Karger, Basel, Switzerland

  32. Neuss MN, Feussner JR, DeLong ER, Cohen HJ (1987) A quantitative analysis of palliative care decisions in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. J Am Geriatr Soc 35:125–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Norgaard JM, Olesen G, Kristensen JS, Pedersen B, Hokland P (1999) Leukaemia cell drug resistance and prognostic factors in AML. Eur J Haematol 63:219–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pulsoni A, Pagano L, Tosti MB, et al. (2000) Retrospective survival analysis of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with aggressive or non-aggressive therapy. Blood 96 [Suppl 1]:503a

  35. Resegotti L (1992) Treatment of acute nonlymphoid leukemia (ANLL) in elderly patients. The GIMEMA experience. Leukemia 6 [Suppl 2]:72–75

  36. Ross JRY, Gilbert MJ (1993) Leukemia survival in an unselected cohort of patients The Oxford Region leukemia register. Br J Haematol 84:37

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rossi G, Pelizzari AM, Bellotti D, Tonelli M, Barlati S (2000) Cytogenetic analogy between myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia of elderly patients. Leukemia 14:636–641

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson B, et al. (2002) Randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous azacitidine (AzaC) in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB). J Clin Oncol 20:2429–2440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, et al. (1998) Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Blood 91:756–763

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Smolich BD, Yuen HA, West KA, Giles FJ, Albitar M (2000) The antiangiogenic protein kinase inhibitors SU5416 and SU6668 inhibit the SCR receptor (c-kit) in a human myeloid leukemia cell line and in acute myeloid leukemia blasts. Blood 97:1413–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stasi R, Venditti A, Del Poeta G, et al. (1996) Intensive treatment of patients age 60 years and older with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 77:2476–2488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Taylor P, Bown N, Cuthbert G, et al. (2001) A population based study of de-novo AML to assess karyotype incidence pattern and its impact on survival by age cohorts. Ann Hematol 80 [Suppl 2]:S19

  43. Taylor PR, Reid MM, Stark AN, Bown N, Hamilton PJ, Proctor SJ (1995) De novo acute myeloid leukaemia in patients over 55 years old: a population-based study of incidence, treatment and outcome. Northern Region Haematology Group. Leukemia 9:231–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wahlin A, Hornsten P, Jonsson H (1991) Remission rate and survival in acute myeloid leukemia: impact of selection and chemotherapy. Eur J Haematol 46:240–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wäsch R, Reisser S, Hahn J, et al. (1998) Rapid achievement of complete donor chimerism and low regimen-related toxicity after reduced conditioning with fludarabine, carmustine, melphalan and allogeneic transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 26:243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wijermans P, Lübbert M, Verhoef G, et al. (2000) Low-dose 5- aza-2´-deoxycytidine, a DNA hypomethylating agent, for the treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter phase II study in elderly patients. J Clin Oncol 18:956–962

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zittoun RA, Mandelli F, Willemze R, et al. (1995) Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 332:217–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Thomas Huberty, Markus Eisen and Dr. Annett Gesien for their valuable help with data acquisition, and Dr. Sebastian Fetscher, Lübeck, for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Lübbert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Behringer, B., Pitako, J.A., Kunzmann, R. et al. Prognosis of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving either induction or noncurative treatment: a single-center retrospective study. Ann Hematol 82, 381–389 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0650-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-003-0650-0

Keywords

Navigation