Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser ablative fractional resurfacing produces skin damage, with removal of the epidermis and variable portions of the dermis as well as associated residual heating, resulting in new collagen formation and skin tightening. The nonresurfaced epidermis helps tissue to heal rapidly, with short-term postoperative erythema. The results for 40 patients (8 men and 32 women) after a single session of a fractional CO2 resurfacing mode were studied. The treatments included resurfacing of the full face, periocular upper lip, and residual acne scars. The patients had skin prototypes 2 to 4 and wrinkle degrees 1 to 3. The histologic effects, efficacy, and treatment safety in various clinical conditions and for different phototypes are discussed. The CO2 laser for fractional treatment is used in super-pulse mode. The beam is split by a lens into several microbeams, and super-pulse repetition is limited by the pulse width. The laser needs a power adaptation to meet the set fluence per microbeam. Laser pulsing can operate repeatedly on the same spot or be moved randomly over the skin, using several passes to achieve a desired residual thermal effect. Low, medium, and high settings are preprogrammed in the device, and they indicate the strength of resurfacing. A single treatment was given with the patient under topical anesthesia. However, the anesthesia was injected on areas of scar tissue. Medium settings (2 Hz, 30 W, 60 mJ) were used, and two passes were made for dark skins and degree 1 wrinkles. High settings (2 Hz, 60 W, 120 mJ) were used, and three passes were made for degree 3 wrinkles and scar tissue. Postoperatively, resurfaced areas were treated with an ointment of gentamycin, Retinol Palmitate, and DL-methionine (Novartis; Farmaceutics, S.A., Barcelona, Spain). Once epithelialization was achieved, antipigment and sun protection agents were recommended. Evaluations were performed 15 days and 2 months after treatment by both patients and clinicians. Treatment improved wrinkle aspect and scar condition, and no patient reported adverse effects or complications, irrespective of skin type, except for plaques of erythema in areas that received extra laser passes, which were not seen at the 2-month assessment. The results evaluated by clinicians were very much in correlation with those of patients. Immediately after treatment, vaporization was produced by stacked pulses, with clear ablation and collateral heat coagulation. An increased number of random pulses removed more epidermis, and with denser pulses per area, a thermal deposit was noted histologically. At 2 months, a thicker, multicelluar epidermis and an evident increase in collagen were observed. Fractional CO2 laser permits a variety of resurfacing settings that obtain safe, effective skin rejuvenation and correct scar tissue in a single treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ross E, McKinlay J, Anderson R (1999) Why does carbon dioxide laser resurfacing work. Arch Dermatol 135:444–445
Trelles MA, Rigau J, Pardo L, Garcia-Solana L (1999) Electron microscopy comparison of CO2 laser flash scanning and pulse technology one year after skin resurfacing. Int J Dermatol 38:58–64
Scarborough D, Saap L, Bisaccia E (2006) Exploring aesthetic interventions: the gold standard in facial resurfacing: the CO2 laser and future directions, vol 14. HMP Communications, LLC. http://www.skinandaging.com/article/6271. Accessed 25 March 2010
Trelles MA, Levi JL, Pardo L, Kontoes V, Soria C (2000) Complication du relissage laser CO2: Une revue de 728 patients. J Med Esthet Chir Dermatol 27:169–174
Berlin AL, Hussain M, Phelps R, Goldberg DJ (2009) A prospective study of fractional scanned nonsequential carbon dioxide laser resurfacing: a clinical and histopathologic evaluation. Dermatol Surg 35:222–228
Fife DJ, Fitzpatrick RE, Zachary CB (2009) Complications of fractional CO2 laser resurfacing: four cases. Lasers Surg Med 41:179–184
Groff WF, Fitzpatrick RE, Uebelhoer NS (2008) Fractional carbon dioxide laser and plasmakinetic skin resurfacing. Semin Cutan Med Surg 27:239–251
Gold MH (2007) Fractional technology: a review and clinical approaches. J Drugs Dermatol 6:849–852
Trelles MA, Rigau J (1997) Proceso de Curación de las Heridas. Cuidados Postoperatorios. ¿Pueden Evitarse las Complicaiones en el Resurfacing Láser? Dermocosmet Clin 5:20–27
Trelles MA, Garcia-Solana L, Allones I (2003) Ensayo clínico y de Laboratorio de una crema de caléndula en el post resurfacing láser (Clinical laboratory trials of a calendula cream following laser resurfacing). Cir Plást Ibero-Latinoamericana 29:11–24
Garcia-Solana L, Allones I, Vélez M, Trelles MA (2002) Función de los cosméticos en el resurfacing láser. Int J Cosmetic Med Surg 4:151–154
Trelles MA (2004) Laser ablative resurfacing for photorejuvenation based on more than a decade’s experience and 1, 200 patients: Personal observations. J Cosmet Dermatol 2:2–13
Trelles MA, Mordon S, Vélez M, Urdiales F, Levy JL (2009) Results of fractional ablative facial skin resurfacing with the erbium-yttrium-aluminium:ytrrium-aluminum-garnet laser 1 week and 2 months after one single treatment in 30 patients. Lasers Med Sci 24:186–194
Trelles MA, Mordon S, Svaasand LO, Mellor TK, Rigau J, Garcia L (1998) The origin and role of erythema after carbon dioxide laser resurfacing: a clinical and histological study. Dermatol Surg 24:25–29
Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK et al (2004) Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodelling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med 34:426–438
Kono T, Chan HH, Groff WF, Manstein D, Sakurai H, Tekeuchi M, Yamaki T, Soejima K, Nozaki M (2007) Prospective direct comparison study of fractional resurfacing using different fluences and densities for skin rejuvenation in Asians. Lasers Surg Med 39:311–314
Tannous Z (2007) Fractional resurfacing. Clin Dermatol 25:480–486
Geronemus RG (2006) Fractional photothermolysis: current and future applications. Lasers Surg Med 38:169–176
Trelles MA, Pardo L, Ayliffe P, Trelles K, Vélez M, Garcia Solana L (2001) Patients’ answers to a postoperative questionnaire related to laser resurfacing. Facial Plast Surg 17:187–192
Hasegawa T, Matsukura T, Mizuno Y, Suga Y, Ogawa H, Ikeda S (2006) Clinical trial of a laser device called fractional photothermolysis system for acne scars. J Dermatol 33:623–627
Lee HS, Lee JH, Ahn GY, Lee DH, Shin JW, Kim Dh, Chung JH (2008) Fractional photothermaolysis for the treatment of acne scars: a report of 27 Korean patients. J Dermatol Treat 19:45–49
Trelles MA, Rigau J, Pardo L, Garcia-Solana L (1999) Electron microscopy comparison of CO2 laser flash scanning and pulse technology one year after skin resurfacing. Int J Dermatol 38:58–64
Trelles MA, Garcia-Solana L, Rigau J, Allones I, Vélez M (2003) Pulsed and scanned carbon dioxide laser resurfacing 2 years after treatment: comparison by means of scanning electron microscopy. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:2069–2078
Trelles MA, Vélez M, Mordon S (2008) Correlation of histological findings of single session Er:YAG skin fractional resurfacing with various passes and energies and the possible clinical implications. Lasers Surg Med 40:171–177
Kauvar A (2000) Laser skin resurfacing: Perspectives at the millenium. Dermatol Surg 26:174–177
Tan KL, Kurniawati C, Gold MH (2008) Low risk of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in skin types 4 and 5 after treatment with fractional CO2 laser device. J Drugs Dermatol 7:774–777
Trelles MA, Trelles K, Allones I, Romero C, Vélez M (2008) Cuidados post resurfacing: Láser en dermatología y dermocosmética. Aula Médica, Chapt. 9.4, pp 387–392. ISBN:978-847885-445-5
Acknowledgments
The report presented in this study is registered in the academic activities of the FUNDACION ANTONI DE GIMBERNAT year 2009–2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trelles, M.A., Shohat, M. & Urdiales, F. Safe and Effective One-Session Fractional Skin Resurfacing Using a Carbon Dioxide Laser Device in Super-Pulse Mode: A Clinical and Histologic Study. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 31–42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9553-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9553-3