Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Megaprostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint: indication, technique, results and review of literature

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially in patients with multiple revisions, remain challenging mainly due to bone quality and loss of bone stock. Megaprostheses, although providing immediate stability and weight bearing, are rarely used in this indication. The aim of the study was to provide a description of the surgical technique and evaluate the outcome of this technique with respectable published data.

Materials and methods

Systematic literature review revealed seven studies dealing with treating PPF after TKA using megaprostheses. Including the results of 11 cases treated in our institution between January 2008 and December 2014, 144 megaprostheses have been evaluated in the current literature with indication of PPF after TKA. Mean age at operation ranged from 68.4 to 81 years and mean follow-up from 6 to 58.6 months.

Results

Revision rates after implantation of megaprostheses in PPFs ranged from 0 % (two studies with a mean follow-up of 6 and 33 months, respectively) to 55 %, all primarily performed for mechanical and nonmechanical failures (20 and 25, respectively). However infection was the most predominant reason for nonmechanical failure. Mortality rates ranged from 6.6 % after 1 year to 45 % after a mean follow-up of 34 months.

Conclusion

Megaprostheses represent a valuable option in distal femoral PPFs type 3 according to Su et al., as well as proximal tibia PPFs type 1B according to Felix et al., with loose tibial components. Infection remains the most frequent nonmechanical complication. Prospective clinical studies are required to exactly define the outcome of this technique in PPFs; use of the Henderson classification system would allow comparison between megaprostheses in oncological and nononcological indications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harrison RJ Jr, Thacker MM, Pitcher JD, Temple HT, Scully SP (2006) Distal femur replacement is useful in complex total knee arthroplasty revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:113–120. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000214433.64774.1b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Henderson ER, Groundland JS, Pala E, Dennis JA, Wooten R, Cheong D, Windhager R, Kotz RI, Mercuri M, Funovics PT, Hornicek FJ, Temple HT, Ruggieri P, Letson GD (2011) Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:418–429. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kotz R, Dominkus M, Zettl T, Ritschl P, Windhager R, Gadner H, Zielinski C, Salzer-Kuntschik M (2002) Advances in bone tumour treatment in 30 years with respect to survival and limb salvage. A single institution experience. Int Orthop 26:197–202. doi:10.1007/s00264-002-0365-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kotz R (2010) Megaprostheses: KMFTR to GMRS. Orthopade 39:922–930. doi:10.1007/s00132-009-1567-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Appleton P, Moran M, Houshian S, Robinson CM (2006) Distal femoral fractures treated by hinged total knee replacement in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1065–1070. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aaron RK, Scott R (1987) Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res:136–139

  7. Merkel KD, Johnson EW Jr (1986) Supracondylar fracture of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:29–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW (1999) Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 30:209–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Inglis AE, Walker PS (1991) Revision of failed knee replacements using fixed-axis hinges. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:757–761

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meek RM, Norwood T, Smith R, Brenkel IJ, Howie CR (2011) The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:96–101. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE (2004) Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:12–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Felix NA, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD (1997) Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia associated with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res:113–124

  13. Korim MT, Esler CN, Reddy VR, Ashford RU (2013) A systematic review of endoprosthetic replacement for nontumour indications around the knee joint. Knee 20:367–375. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2013.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jassim SS, McNamara I, Hopgood P (2014) Distal femoral replacement in periprosthetic fracture around total knee arthroplasty. Injury 45:550–553. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mortazavi SM, Kurd MF, Bender B, Post Z, Parvizi J, Purtill JJ (2010) Distal femoral arthroplasty for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25:775–780. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Utting MR, Newman JH (2004) Customised hinged knee replacements as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty. Knee 11:475–479. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2003.12.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr (2009) Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:485–492. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0329-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Saidi K, Ben-Lulu O, Tsuji M, Safir O, Gross AE, Backstein D (2014) Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures of the knee in the elderly patients: a comparison of treatment using allograft-implant composites, standard revision components, distal femoral replacement prosthesis. J Arthroplast 29:110–114. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Holl S, Schlomberg A, Gosheger G, Dieckmann R, Streitbuerger A, Schulz D, Hardes J (2012) Distal femur and proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis in revision knee arthroplasty: a limb-saving procedure. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc : Off J ESSKA 20:2513–2518. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-1945-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ebraheim NA, Liu J, Hashmi SZ, Sochacki KR, Moral MZ, Hirschfeld AG (2012) High complication rate in locking plate fixation of lower periprosthetic distal femur fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast 27:809–813. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen AF, Choi LE, Colman MW, Goodman MA, Crossett LS, Tarkin IS, McGough RL (2013) Primary versus secondary distal femoral arthroplasty for treatment of total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic femur fractures. J Arthroplast 28:1580–1584. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Calori GM, Colombo M, Malagoli E, Mazzola S, Bucci M, Mazza E (2014) Megaprosthesis in post-traumatic and periprosthetic large bone defects: issues to consider. Injury 45(Suppl 6):S105–110. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Ahmed I, Patton JT, Howie CR (2014) Total femoral replacement for salvage of periprosthetic fractures. Orthopedics 37:e789–795. doi:10.3928/01477447-20140825-55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A (2007) Periprosthetic fractures of the knee. J Arthroplast 22:45–49. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim KI, Egol KA, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2006) Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:167–175. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000214417.29335.19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Reinhard Windhager, Markus Schreiner, Kevin Staats & Sebastian Apprich

Authors
  1. Reinhard Windhager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Schreiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kevin Staats
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sebastian Apprich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Windhager.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Windhager, R., Schreiner, M., Staats, K. et al. Megaprostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the knee joint: indication, technique, results and review of literature. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 935–943 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2991-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2991-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation