Skip to main content
Log in

Migration of the Duraloc cup after 5 years

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Duraloc cup is a frequently used metal-backed, porous-coated, hemispherical, press-fit acetabular component. Published data on loosening rates are contradictory. In this study we investigated migration patterns with computer-assisted Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse (EBRA) of 67 Duraloc 100 cups. Cup migration and clinical scores were analysed over a 5-year follow-up period. Median total migration of the Duraloc 100 cup was 1.21 mm at 5 years. Seventy-five percent of implants were radiologically stable at 2 years and 90% at 4 years. One cup loosened aseptically at 60 months, requiring revision. Cup diameters ≥54 mm migrated significantly more than cups <54 mm in diameter (p = 0.029 at 4 years). There was a significant correlation between high polyethylene wear and further migrating cups within the first post-operative year (p = 0.035 at 12 months). Our analysis revealed significantly higher wear in males (p = 0.029 at 4 years). Radiological loosening at two years could be calculated using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, and 1.2 mm as an adequate threshold value (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 89%).

Résumé

La cupule DURALOC est une cupule utilisée de façon fréquente avec un composant acétabulaire sans ciment, porous coated, hémisphérique. Les publications indiquant les taux de descellement de cet implant sont très contradictoires. Dans cette étude, nous avons étudié la migration de cette cupule par méthode informatique avec un logiciel de type EBRA. La migration de la cupule et les scores ont été analysés après une période de cinq ans de suivi. La migration moyenne de 100 cupules DURALOC a été de 1.21mm à 5 ans, 75% des implants étaient stables radiologiquement à 2 ans et 90% à 4 ans. Une cupule s’est descellée de façon aseptique à 60 mois, nécessitant une révision. Les cupules de diamètre ≥54mm migrant de façon plus fréquente que les cupules plus petites (p = 0.029 à 4 ans). De même, a été mis en évidence une corrélation significative entre l’usure du polyéthylène et la migration de la cupule dans les premières années (p = 0.035 à 12 mois). Notre analyse montre qu’il existe une usure significativement plus importante chez les hommes (p = 0.029 à 4 ans). La valeur seuil de l’usure à 2 ans étant de 1.2mm (sensitivité = 100% ; spécificité = 89%)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Girard J, Laffargue P, Decoulx J, Migaud H (2005) Reliability of porous coating metal-backed cups: advantages and adverse effect of a posterior elevated rim polyethylene liner (in French). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 91:432–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grobler GP, Learmonth ID, Bernstein BP, Dower BJ (2005) Ten-year results of a press-fit, porous-coated acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:786–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hintermann B, Morscher EW (1995) Total hip replacement with solid autologous femoral head graft for hip dysplasia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:137–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ilchmann T, Franzen H, Mjoberg B, Wingstrand H (1992) Measurement accuracy in acetabular cup migration. A comparison of four radiologic methods versus roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 7:121–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ilchmann T, Freeman MA, Mjoberg B (1992) Accuracy of the Nunn method in measuring acetabular cup migration. Ups J Med Sci 97:67–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim YH (2002) Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a close proximal fit and short tapered distal stem (third-generation) prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 17:841–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim JS (2003) Primary total hip arthroplasty with a second-generation cementless total hip prosthesis in patients younger than fifty years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:109–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krismer M, Fischer M, Mayrhofer P, Stockl F, Bittner C, Trojer C, Stockl B (1994) A prospective study of the migration of two acetabular components. PCA versus RM cups. Int Orthop 18:23–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krismer M, Bauer R, Tschupik J, Mayrhofer P (1995) EBRA: a method to measure migration of acetabular components. J Biomech 28:1225–1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krismer M, Stockl B, Fischer M, Bauer R, Mayrhofer P, Ogon M (1996) Early migration predicts late aseptic failure of hip sockets. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:422–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krismer M, Biedermann R, Stöckl B, Fischer M, Bauer R, Haid C (1999) The prediction of failure of the stem in THR by measurement of early migration using EBRA-FCA. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:273–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mjoberg B (1991) Fixation and loosening of hip prostheses. A review. Acta Orthop Scand 62:500–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Phillips NJ, Stockley I, Wilkinson JM (2002) Direct plain radiographic methods versus EBRA-Digital for measuring implant migration after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:917–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stocks GW, Freeman MAR, Evans SJW (1995) Acetabular cup migration. Prediction of aseptic loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:853–861

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stöckl B, Sandow M, Krismer M, Biedermann R, Wimmer C, Frischhut B (1999) Migration of the Duraloc cup at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:51–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stoeckl B, Brabec E, Wanner S, Krismer M, Biedermann R (2005) Radiographic evaluation of the Duraloc cup after 4 years. Int Orthop 29:14–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Takatori Y, Ninomiya S, Umeyama T, Yamamoto M, Moro T, Nakamura K (2002) Bipolar revision arthroplasty for failed threaded acetabular components: radiographic evaluation of cup migration. J Orthop Sci 7:467–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vernois J, Gabrion A, Havet E, Gaullier O, Mertl P (2004) The cementless Duraloc acetabular component: 100 cases assessed after a minimum five year follow-up (in French). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90:434–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkinson JM, Hamer AJ, Elson RA, Stockley I, Eastell R (2002) Precision of EBRA-Digital software for monitoring implant migration after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:910–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Windhager.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stihsen, C., Pabinger, C., Radl, R. et al. Migration of the Duraloc cup after 5 years. International Orthopaedics (SICO 32, 791–794 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0405-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0405-y

Keywords

Navigation